I've had a BORS for a few years mounted on BORS Zero Gap rings on a Leupold Mark 4 8.5-25x50. I've been asked by many people over the years and at the range how I like it. I recently sent someone that asked about my BORS an email of my impressions along with considerations to take into account before dropping the coin on one. Below is the email that may provide some useful information. FYI: I sold off the scope system just a few months back to raise some cash for something else.
=========================
There is a lot to like about the BORS piece of equipment and overall I have been very satisfied with what it does. However, before I would give you my unqualified and whole hearted endorsement of the product to a specific shooter. I would need to get more information in terms of shooting experience in LR precision, the equipment you use and already own, and your expectations for how you intend to use the BORS. Since I don't have that information, I can give you a couple of scenarios where the BORS would either be an ideal piece of gear to own, or not the best purchase if you have $1300 to spend on one.
A few questions to think about to set the context for whether a BORS is a good piece of gear for you. 1. Do you already own one of the four rifle scopes the BORS is designed to work with?
2. Are you an experienced precision long range shooter? More specifically, are you comfortable with using a Kestrel to take environmental readings and entering the information into a ballistic application to determine your DOPE for your rifle in that situation?
3. What is your intended use of the rifle that the BORS and scope will be on? Will you be just shooting LRP for fun, will you be hunting, or shooting matches?
Let's take each of these questions on their own and I'll explain why these questions are relevant for consideration.
1. Do you already own one of the four rifle scopes the BORS is designed to work with? • When Barrett introduced the BORS product line in 2009 it was designed to work specifically with a small handful of high-end rifle scopes. These scopes were among the best at the time. However, today (almost 5 years later) although these scopes are still available and good scopes there are other and perhaps better alternatives at the price point they compete in. Unfortunately, Barrett has not invested a lot of money in updating the product line to make it compatible with current popular high end scopes out there. If you decide to get the BORS, you are basically making a commitment to marry the BORS to the scope and given the overall cost of the investment, you'd likely keep that scope a long time. If you end up selling the scope down the road, you would end up selling the BORS unit at substantial discount.
• I suggest if you have the right scope that will work with the BORS, then this is would weigh favorably towards considering getting the BORS unit. Otherwise, I would recommend taking the additionally money that you could spend on the BORS and get a really nice piece of glass (Schmidt & Bender, USO, Premier, etc.)
2. Are you an experienced precision long range shooter? More specifically, are you comfortable at using a Kestrel to take environmental readings and entering the information into a ballistic application to determine your DOPE for your rifle in that situation? • The main reason to even consider getting a BORS unit is to remove the complexity of coming up with an accurate ballistic solution in a dynamic environment (changing ammo type, changing distance to target, changing environmental conditions, changing shooting locations, etc.) All the shooter needs to do is make sure the BORS unit is programmed for the ammo load (Caliber, BC and muzzle velocity) and dial in distance to target. That's it. As long as it is set up properly it's dummy proof. Barrett originally developed the BORS for the military/LEO market where they could basically hand a long range weapons system to an operator, preprogrammed for standard issue ammo - and the person can be on target immediately just by dialing in the distance to target. The user doesn't need to know anything about ballistics tables or DOPE for the rifle. This has advantages, particularly if the shooter is new to long range, or if you want to introduce someone to long range precision shooting - using the BORS helps to lower the barriers to getting into the game.
• If the shooter has a lot of experience shooting long range precision and understands external ballistics, how to use a ballistic app properly, and how to dial the solution on his/her scope, there really is no need to use a BORS.
3. What is your intended use of the rifle that the BORS and scope will be on? Will you be just shooting LRP for fun, will you be hunting, or shooting matches? • The BORS unit is designed and built for military field use and is therefore rugged and adds weight. The additional weight/size needs to be taken into consideration for how it might be used. If it is to be used primarily for long range precision practice or for fun, it would be ideal particularly for applications where you are sharing your rifle with someone that may not know the DOPE for your rifle or understand ballistics.
• Hunting -- extra weight to carry around...
• For matches, I would discourage its use. In practical long range matches, speed really counts. I've found that it slower to dial and watch the screen yardage change to get on target versus, knowing for example that for target "A" I need to hold 1.5 mils or simply just dial 1.5 mils on my turret. The BORS unit is much slower and clumsy to work with in a match type situation.
I've enjoyed using my BORS and like I said, for what it does - it does well. But I still own several other high end scope gear (Schmidt & Bender PMII with H58, Premier, Bushnell HDMR with H59, Bushnell XRS). I'm not familiar with your situation, but if you are considering dropping serious coin on your first high-end rifle scope step up and over the BORS and go with one of today's hign end rifle scopes and and dive into getting up to speed with a ballistic app and a Kestrel.
Hope this helps.