Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Drop it in the replies for the chance to win a free shirt!
Join the contestAs a Libertarian I'm all for legalizing it all and allowing personal responsibility to take over. The war on drugs has failed long ago. Haven't these idiots learned from prohibition and how that failed? Nowadays we got kids who are getting high on anything from bath salts to detergent pods. If there's a way to get high, they WILL find it. Hell, anyone remember as a kid and teen sucking the N2O out of the Redi-Whip cans?![]()
Require 100 percent responsibility/liability for your actions and eliminate all public funding of treatment for peoples life choices.
Hearing what is going on is it so far fetched to consider that the opioid epidemic was not so much an error but an intention?
Unfortunately, this won't work. What happens to the victims? No one ever killed someone for the money to buy a bag of weed. Lot's have been killed for the money to get your next fix of vitamin C, crack, horse, etc.
Do you put the perpetrators in jail when they can't pay the reparations ordered...war on drugs proved that won't work. Not enough prison space which leads to time off for good behavior for a lot of hardened criminals. Maybe @macameron is right. Help them find their way out of their miserable existence and save the money and effort.
As a Libertarian I'm all for legalizing it all and allowing personal responsibility to take over. The war on drugs has failed long ago. Haven't these idiots learned from prohibition and how that failed? Nowadays we got kids who are getting high on anything from bath salts to detergent pods. If there's a way to get high, they WILL find it. Hell, anyone remember as a kid and teen sucking the N2O out of the Redi-Whip cans?![]()
I prefer personal freedom and a lack of .gov intervention. So, I'm all for it. I'd suggest you NOT try heroin so you won't need to utilize these places but if you do decide to...
On a side note, all this heroin addiction is a direct result of the opioid over prescription and use by doctors whom I assume have been motivated by pharmaceuticals to push, push, push.
I guess it wasn't the oil we were after.
The problem with letting Darwin do his job is the innocents that they take with them.
"hell we need to get rid of drinking limits and just arrest mfrs for reckless driving."
Really? I hope you don't have kids or grandkids that would pay with their lives for that cavalier attitude.
I've arrested folks with 6 or 7 DUI's.
had a poor family in our jurisdiction lose their infant and their other child was seriously injured when a POS on a meth bender plowed into them from behind while they were stopped for a school bus. Yeah, drugs don't hurt anybody.
https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html
On a side note, all this heroin addiction is a direct result of the opioid over prescription and use by doctors whom I assume have been motivated by pharmaceuticals to push, push, push.
Prove it
So youre for lack of govt intervention......but you supoort govt funded junkie safe spaces?
You missed the part where "I" stated that "I" "assumed". But the shear state that our entire country is in due to opiate addiction and the vast majority of that contributed to prescriptions, I'd reckon a guess <notice my words/ that it has a little something to do with it. And also considering the shear amount of money pharmaceuticals companies spend on lobbying the country over, it doesn't take much more than common sense to put the two together.
Not sure why you need me to "prove it" to you. Do you have skin in this game?
I do support a "safe place" for homeless junkies to shoot up in.
The problem with letting Darwin do his job is the innocents that they take with them.
"hell we need to get rid of drinking limits and just arrest mfrs for reckless driving."
Really? I hope you don't have kids or grandkids that would pay with their lives for that cavalier attitude.
I've arrested folks with 6 or 7 DUI's.
had a poor family in our jurisdiction lose their infant and their other child was seriously injured when a POS on a meth bender plowed into them from behind while they were stopped for a school bus. Yeah, drugs don't hurt anybody.
https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html
Doesn't the fact that you (and I, and every cop I know) have arrested multiple repeat drunk drivers show that it isn't working?
If we weren't putting people in jail for having a bag of weed, we'd have more space for people who comitted real crimes that actually hurt people.
Further, isn't the reasonable suspicion for a DUI stop awfully similar to that for reckless driving?
As pointed out earlier, prohibition should have provided all the evidence ever needed about the foolishness of outlawing things instead of behaviors.
DUI laws and most laws are about revenue not fixing the problem. you should know that by now.
I wasn't in Vietnam, as I was an infant/toddler at that time. But correct me if I'm wrong heroin was there too, no? During the '80s, many doctors 'freely prescribing' this stuff? And yes, I kinda have some personal experience on "prescriptions" and whatnot, after my many months of living in the hospitals. It was upon getting out that I learned the difference between "dependency and addiction". When I simply didn't refill my prescription (that I had been on for all those months 'inside'.... ) I learned right quick, AND THEN OVER THE NEXT 3 DAYS what the word "dependency" truly means.all this heroin addiction is a direct result of the opioid over prescription and use by doctors whom I assume have been motivated by pharmaceuticals to push, push, push.
308.
I work in healthcare for the last 20 yrs in one capacity or another. He is pretty much right on it that big pharma pushed it and many Drs participated because its easy work and hey, its medicine so its good.
There is a case, big pharma owner either charged or convicted of paying of a ton of MDs to push his Oxycontin he made. He will go down for it for sure.
These are people with so much money they think they can get by with anything. Like the Clintons......
The difference between reckless driving and driving under the influence is the fact that when you are driving under the influence, you do not have full use of your faculties. Your vision is impaired, your reactions are impaired, your balance, which affects your ability to stay in a lane in impaired.Doesn't the fact that you (and I, and every cop I know) have arrested multiple repeat drunk drivers show that it isn't working?
If we weren't putting people in jail for having a bag of weed, we'd have more space for people who comitted real crimes that actually hurt people.
Further, isn't the reasonable suspicion for a DUI stop awfully similar to that for reckless driving?
As pointed out earlier, prohibition should have provided all the evidence ever needed about the foolishness of outlawing things instead of behaviors.
The difference between reckless driving and driving under the influence is the fact that when you are driving under the influence, you do not have full use of your faculties. Your vision is impaired, your reactions are impaired, your balance, which affects your ability to stay in a lane in impaired.
It is a public safety issue.
There are likely thousands of folks every day that make the choice not to drink and drive, not because of some altruistic reason, but because it is illegal and they don't want to go to jail.
maybe the real cure is to attach the death penalty to intoxicated driving.
Not true.Can't argue with the physiological effects of being drunk, but practically speaking, what's the difference?
There's an old saying, "Someone who can read, but doesn't, is no better off than soneone who can't".
A dtiver who isn't drunk, but doesn't use his faculties is no more or less dangerous than a drunk driver who has impaired faculties.
The Forward is a jewish publication, so I doubt they're anti-jewish, but I've been wrong before.Kind of skeptical from the headline on.
Does the mention of their worshiping according to the old testament say something about their business or the journalist?
Oh that's right, it's common sense that doctors and "big bad pharma" are guilty because you say so.
Why bother finding out the truth to a complex problem when a simpleton already has it all figured out.