Are you asking about the source, or what that says?
Source can be found here:
and if you click the blue tab in the upper left you will follow that same discussion on 8 chan (which is very high noise to signal site) This story started in OCT 2017.
Honestly, there has been a lot of new things to look at in the last couple of weeks and that is one facet of the story that I have set aside, b/c in the broader context of the story that is being told, the juice isn’t worth the squeeze.
Mentally, I look at this and I am to deduce that Stormy Daniels and this whole matter that is reported in the press is cover.
I would suspect what is being said is a couple of things -
*Does it make legitimate sense that they are attacking POTUS with the public reason of a private matter?
*Rosenstien is inferred to have signed off on this. Rosenstien is also a signator to FISA warrants
*Thus driving another nail into the house showing that the FBI is not upholding the Law, but they instead serving a political master that is NOT the POTUS, and thus not the American People
*I have not followed Rudy at all, but I know that Sessions spooled him up in December of 2017 on his own investigation, and in glancing at headlines - he at least looks like a loud barking dog at this point
*A reoccurring topic is to keep track of all of the important people from both the Gov and private sectors that have resigned from prominent leadership positions, or have suffered public surge for being a pervert and have subsequently stepped down in shame since Trump has taken office. Let’s just say, its a big list.
*Who has the Power? I think he is reminding us that the Presidency retains sufficient horsepower to make it happen, and your seeing that in tweets recently, along with that perverted bitchboy Schumer ranting in response
*RE:Resignations / why are we here - many think he is speaking to those that want to live Free - and saying your problem doesn’t go away if the POTUS is defeated, you’re here b/c you job is to dig for information (b/c and back up at the top 1/3 of the post) some of what the NSA has needs a legal pathway in to the courts.
Again, this is angle of the story I am not tracking closely.