• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    View thread

Paris is Burning

Assuming they had a security camera system that probably should have had remote monitoring capability, they should have been able to locate the general location where the fire started if it was in a "public" area.

If it started in a construction area, they need to figure out if it was an inside job. Hopefully the church wasn't dumb enough to hire jihadis to renovate the place.

A good fire investigator shouldn't have much trouble determining the place where the fire started with all of the video footage and other evidence.


Never assume.
It is reported several times, it started in a work area in the steeple, where the ancient roof timbers fueled the fire like heart pine lider, and ran the whole roof timber area, but not into the lower areas.
A few sources have reported Macron is catching flack because there were no sprinklers in the roof area, and that lack of preventive equipment is missing in other historic sites as well, and has been reported as problems in previous historical site's fires.
These reports have been squelched. It was "initially believed" to be a construction accident in the steeple.

All that has been drowned in the conjecture and following news where more questions are asked than facts presented and the conjecture comes faster than investigations can produce results.
Fwiw, I did fire investigation for 8 years, and have seen really hot fires destroy evidence, and it come down to a single witness "finally" telling, I screwed up, sometimes years later.

We are going to have to wait and see, then judge the evidence, not conjecture or opinion.

Best to you all.
 
Wait a minute.. you just chastised someone for trolling you but then turn around and troll in general terms? How can you expect a functional discourse when responding in such terms?

If you hadn’t noticed that is a pattern that repeats itself quite often.
 
  • Like
Reactions: j-huskey
Wait a minute.. you just chastised someone for trolling you but then turn around and troll in general terms? How can you expect a functional discourse when responding in such terms?

Everyone has a viewpoint and those that feel someone is going after churches over there are likely right.

""Dobbs suggested the fire may be linked to a reported spike in church vandalism in France. “Perhaps overlooked since yesterday is 875 Catholic churches in France were vandalized in 2018—875,” he said. “In a single week last month, 12 churches were vandalized, including a fire deliberately set at a church also located in Paris. This is context, this is not speculation, this is the situation right now in France and the recent history of what has happened to Catholic churches throughout the nation.”"

https://www.newsweek.com/notre-dame...dent-islamists-fox-business-vandalism-1398879
You just hate protected class and are posting from a radical news site
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheMammoth
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/17/europe/notre-dame-fire-investigation-intl/index.html


Scrutiny has fallen on the firms undertaking the renovation of the 150-year-old spire, which collapsed Monday as the flames raged around it.

Of the four companies contracted to carry out renovations at Notre Dame, only two companies, scaffolding firm Europe Echafaudage and art conservationists Socra, had work in progress there at the time of the fire. Neither company had workers on site when the fire broke out, CNN has been told

Further into the article it mentions that the contractors had left the site an hour before the fire was reported.

To that says their not out of the woods. The fire could have been started by their workers (unintentionally) before they left while it slowly built into the inferno...
 
I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that a national treasure/museum that's open to the public should have surveillance in the public areas. It should have the hard drives off site and they should be monitored by security and probably local police.

If they don't have that, shame on them.
 
Wait a minute.. you just chastised someone for trolling you but then turn around and troll in general terms? How can you expect a functional discourse when responding in such terms?

Everyone has a viewpoint and those that feel someone is going after churches over there are likely right.

I don't expect functional discourse. I've lost hope that certain parties would look at this without the weight of confirmation bias. My comment was a flippant nod to the suggestion that disrepair and lack of preventative mechanisms were likely causes. Given the chance to spew hatred and advance conjecture, though, an Occam's Razor explanation won't fly for some.
 
Hi,

You know what is ironic....??

Same type of people that say "Let the investigation be completed" when it comes to a LEO Shooting.
Same type of people that say "Did the person buy the gun legally or illegally" when it comes to a wacko shooting up shit.

Can be the same type of people that will jump to severe conclusions that it had to be someone of a particular religion that is the cause of this Church burning.

Sincerely,
Theis
 
I don't expect functional discourse. I've lost hope that certain parties would look at this without the weight of confirmation bias. My comment was a flippant nod to the suggestion that disrepair and lack of preventative mechanisms were likely causes. Given the chance to spew hatred and advance conjecture, though, an Occam's Razor explanation won't fly for some.

Well nipping it in the bud starts with us. Tit for tat backbiting only fuels the very thing mgmt is asking us to avoid.
 
Hi,

You know what is ironic....??

Same type of people that say "Let the investigation be completed" when it comes to a LEO Shooting.
Same type of people that say "Did the person buy the gun legally or illegally" when it comes to a wacko shooting up shit.

Can be the same type of people that will jump to severe conclusions that it had to be someone of a particular religion that is the cause of this Church burning.

Sincerely,
Theis

If the stats Lou Dobbs is reporting are accurate, then that's a whole lot of proverbial smoke.. albeit I don't think the article pinned responsibility to any one group of perps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheMammoth
Hi,

You know what is ironic....??

Same type of people that say "Let the investigation be completed" when it comes to a LEO Shooting.
Same type of people that say "Did the person buy the gun legally or illegally" when it comes to a wacko shooting up shit.

Can be the same type of people that will jump to severe conclusions that it had to be someone of a particular religion that is the cause of this Church burning.

Sincerely,
Theis
Questions;
Where were you on 9/11?
Where were you when Norte Dame burned?
Where were you when @THEIS changed his avatar?

All history in the making........
 
Last edited:
Wow, just F-ing wow... I didn’t know I was expected to run any topic through a search to see if it had been discussed or banned. I suppose I should say I’m sorry if I hurt anyone’s feelings; but I’m really not. If I broke a rule, then maybe; but F Me WOW! You guys (some of you) go straight to predatory mode. I wouldn’t mind it but you (some of you) do the same thing you accuse others of in your responses.

As to a deep dive on me; more Wow and WTF? Judas Priest this is a gun forum, you know where guys talk about guns. I asked because I am interested in a new purchase and for that matter I discussed what I had and showed some of mine.

Regarding this thread, I posted what I thought was strange. Maybe all those incidents were related, maybe not but discussing them didn’t seem like a issue.

I’m frankly amazed that a forum that calls its self “SNIPERHIDE” has this kind of responses. Yes I’m new but you guys (some of you) act like the pretty girls and just waiting to pounce on the new kid because she’s wearing last year’s fashions. Maybe it’s because she’s prettier... Would it make you happier if I said you were all pretty?

Wow just WOW and who the F really has the time in life to do “deep dives”. That alone sounds scary but none of you called foul on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deersniper
Hey, pal, nip that flippancy in the bud!
4BCDAE46-FEA8-4E16-9CF9-B9D1DADC62A7.gif
 
Wow, just F-ing wow... I didn’t know I was expected to run any topic through a search to see if it had been discussed or banned. I suppose I should say I’m sorry if I hurt anyone’s feelings; but I’m really not. If I broke a rule, then maybe; but F Me WOW! You guys (some of you) go straight to predatory mode. I wouldn’t mind it but you (some of you) do the same thing you accuse others of in your responses.

As to a deep dive on me; more Wow and WTF? Judas Priest this is a gun forum, you know where guys talk about guns. I asked because I am interested in a new purchase and for that matter I discussed what I had and showed some of mine.

Regarding this thread, I posted what I thought was strange. Maybe all those incidents were related, maybe not but discussing them didn’t seem like a issue.

I’m frankly amazed that a forum that calls its self “SNIPERHIDE” has this kind of responses. Yes I’m new but you guys (some of you) act like the pretty girls and just waiting to pounce on the new kid because she’s wearing last year’s fashions. Maybe it’s because she’s prettier... Would it make you happier if I said you were all pretty?

Wow just WOW and who the F really has the time in life to do “deep dives”. That alone sounds scary but none of you called foul on that.
What do you like better rainbow unicorns or white ones?
 
I don't expect functional discourse. I've lost hope that certain parties would look at this without the weight of confirmation bias. My comment was a flippant nod to the suggestion that disrepair and lack of preventative mechanisms were likely causes. Given the chance to spew hatred and advance conjecture, though, an Occam's Razor explanation won't fly for some.

Occam’s Razor is the reason no one buys the narrative you’re so dead set on protecting.

How many church fires since February? All accidents? That’s unlikely, given an cursory google search shows that the incident rate has gone through the roof relative to historic building fires in a normal year.

Again, it’s almost like you have a PERSONAL reason to keep the focus off a certain likely candidate for the fire, and it’s stopping you from admitting that people aren’t just racist for having questions about the incident.

But please, continue to imply that anyone who questions this being pure accident is just a bigot ?

Pathetic.
 
****************extra super redacted************

reminded me of this

7063043





There is more to this than just an accidental church fire, whether it was for insurance money, or to get the largest historic building contract in france in modern days or something more sinister. At this point its all just assumptions, but I've found in the past my spidey senses are quite often correct
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheMammoth
Until something solid comes out of this Im going with, lazy ass french worker wanted to go home from his allotted 4 hour workday early and didnt give a fuck to think something may have been left on or something didnt look safe and didnt care.

Almost had my house burn down during a complete remodel when some lazy fuck left layers and layers of plastic sheeting draped all over one of my giant chandelieers in an area that is 25 plus feet to the ceiling and the plastic draped all the way to a nearby wall and down to the floor and left the lights on.

Had my designer not come by that night to measure some things and smelled burned plastic I would have had a giant fire.
 
Until something solid comes out of this Im going with, lazy ass french worker wanted to go home from his allotted 4 hour workday early and didnt give a fuck to think something may have been left on or something didnt look safe and didnt care.

Almost had my house burn down during a complete remodel when some lazy fuck left layers and layers of plastic sheeting draped all over one of my giant chandelieers in an area that is 25 plus feet to the ceiling and the plastic draped all the way to a nearby wall and down to the floor and left the lights on.

Had my designer not come by that night to measure some things and smelled burned plastic I would have had a giant fire.

It's contagious once you're been there long enough.

 
I actually was shocked the PM committed public funds to rebuild. Until I realize it is a national symbol and tourist attraction way more than a religious venue. France has done their best to marginalize The Church to a museum/tourist attraction. Kinda sad kinda expected.

As a fire inspector/engineer, and with modern technology, they will be able to locate where fire started relatively easy and if any foul play, a culprit will spill the beans sooner or later. Nvr fails lol.

Conspiracy wise, and I love a good one as much as any of us, I would love to see the books on the budget for their renovation related to insurance and see the relation. Wouldn't be surprised if fire was intentional and am waiting to hear it was...ALWAYS follow the $$ is cynical...but true!!


Regards,
DT
They are fully capable of finding the where/when/what/and possibly who.
The desire to publish I find questionable with the wrong conclusion.

R
 
If you hadn’t noticed that is a pattern that repeats itself quite often.

Well then report and document the behavior as often as possible. No sense in the rest of the membership should suffer because one person feels the integrity rule doesn't apply to them. I mean a grab ass thread is one thing, talkin smack, bustin balls for being stupid whatever. But if instigating childish fights is repetitive problem for some we should make it well known until they get the point the behavior is not welcome.
 
Wow, just F-ing wow... I didn’t know I was expected to run any topic through a search to see if it had been discussed or banned. I suppose I should say I’m sorry if I hurt anyone’s feelings; but I’m really not. If I broke a rule, then maybe; but F Me WOW! You guys (some of you) go straight to predatory mode. I wouldn’t mind it but you (some of you) do the same thing you accuse others of in your responses.

As to a deep dive on me; more Wow and WTF? Judas Priest this is a gun forum, you know where guys talk about guns. I asked because I am interested in a new purchase and for that matter I discussed what I had and showed some of mine.

Regarding this thread, I posted what I thought was strange. Maybe all those incidents were related, maybe not but discussing them didn’t seem like a issue.

I’m frankly amazed that a forum that calls its self “SNIPERHIDE” has this kind of responses. Yes I’m new but you guys (some of you) act like the pretty girls and just waiting to pounce on the new kid because she’s wearing last year’s fashions. Maybe it’s because she’s prettier... Would it make you happier if I said you were all pretty?

Wow just WOW and who the F really has the time in life to do “deep dives”. That alone sounds scary but none of you called foul on that.


Umbrage.
Why am I not shocked?
So you aren't reading other posts in the Pit? You are just posting.

You didn't offend me. That would be a collosal acheivement.

@Veer_G how many threads does this make on this now? I count at least 3. Some are locked or gone.
 
Umbrage.
Why am I not shocked?
So you aren't reading other posts in the Pit? You are just posting.

You didn't offend me. That would be a collosal acheivement.

@Veer_G how many threads does this make on this now? I count at least 3. Some are locked or gone.

Can I say that I think there have been two or three? Or is that going to be seen as trolling?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: armorpl8chikn
Wow, just F-ing wow... I didn’t know I was expected to run any topic through a search to see if it had been discussed or banned. I suppose I should say I’m sorry if I hurt anyone’s feelings; but I’m really not. If I broke a rule, then maybe; but F Me WOW! You guys (some of you) go straight to predatory mode. I wouldn’t mind it but you (some of you) do the same thing you accuse others of in your responses.

As to a deep dive on me; more Wow and WTF? Judas Priest this is a gun forum, you know where guys talk about guns. I asked because I am interested in a new purchase and for that matter I discussed what I had and showed some of mine.

Regarding this thread, I posted what I thought was strange. Maybe all those incidents were related, maybe not but discussing them didn’t seem like a issue.

I’m frankly amazed that a forum that calls its self “SNIPERHIDE” has this kind of responses. Yes I’m new but you guys (some of you) act like the pretty girls and just waiting to pounce on the new kid because she’s wearing last year’s fashions. Maybe it’s because she’s prettier... Would it make you happier if I said you were all pretty?

Wow just WOW and who the F really has the time in life to do “deep dives”. That alone sounds scary but none of you called foul on that.
1263E431-5C46-4CB3-A9D2-2DE30B656C16.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: armorpl8chikn
Fires during remodeling are common
- pile of paint thinner soaked rags spontaneously combustion
- stripping paint from tinder dry wood with torch or heat gun
- Burner melting tar to patch roof
- dumb sob dropping his cigarette into flamables
 
Wow, just F-ing wow... I didn’t know I was expected to run any topic through a search to see if it had been discussed or banned. I suppose I should say I’m sorry if I hurt anyone’s feelings; but I’m really not. If I broke a rule, then maybe; but F Me WOW! You guys (some of you) go straight to predatory mode. I wouldn’t mind it but you (some of you) do the same thing you accuse others of in your responses.

As to a deep dive on me; more Wow and WTF? Judas Priest this is a gun forum, you know where guys talk about guns. I asked because I am interested in a new purchase and for that matter I discussed what I had and showed some of mine.

Regarding this thread, I posted what I thought was strange. Maybe all those incidents were related, maybe not but discussing them didn’t seem like a issue.

I’m frankly amazed that a forum that calls its self “SNIPERHIDE” has this kind of responses. Yes I’m new but you guys (some of you) act like the pretty girls and just waiting to pounce on the new kid because she’s wearing last year’s fashions. Maybe it’s because she’s prettier... Would it make you happier if I said you were all pretty?

Wow just WOW and who the F really has the time in life to do “deep dives”. That alone sounds scary but none of you called foul on that.
Be careful there buddy. There is a strict four (4) ‘wow’ limit per post here. You’re one over. I’ll let you off with a warning this time cause you’re a newb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1J04
Sort of a self fulfilled prophacy of when somone derails a thread with a discussion on trolls and shit-slinging.

Its not about the topic or the controversial discussion about it. Its about the inability to have a discussion on any subject without shit-slinging.