• New Contest Starting Now! This Target Haunts Me

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

New process to buy ammo in California vs the rest of us

Racer88

Firearms Pedant
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Nov 10, 2018
    1,160
    1,608
    A friend on Facebook posted a flowchart that outlines the new requirements / process to buy ammo in California. It inspired me to create my own flowchart to describe how the rest of us buy ammo. :)

    7103168
     
    we dont want you moving to America, stay there and fix your shithole
    They can't. The mezzicans are the majority, the queers outnumber the straights and the moron actors in LA drive the clown cars. There's no hope in CA beyond that earthquake that's expected to have 30 million people surfing to Denver.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: gigamortis
    People will only obey laws they believe in. So if your state leadership believes in thumbing their nose at the COTUS over a right good men an women fought an died for, you have two choices.
    LIVE ON YOUR FUCKING KNEES OR GROW A SET OF BALLS OR TIT'S. I KNOW WOMEN AN KIDS WITH MORE SPINE THAN SOME IN THAT SHIT HOLE.
    The thing that gets me is the shooting industry as a whole supports the B/S that's going on there by still selling to that states LE. If I were the CEO of anything gun related I'd cut off everything to LE in that state, they deprive the citizen of. Many on this board empower that shit whole by buying crap made or that is unloaded at it's ports.
    Put your personal policy's where your mouths are an quit buying anything that touches that shit hole.

    edit,... for fat fingers an lack of eye to brain function.
     
    Last edited:
    Off the top of your head any idea what type 7 C&R costs?
    Shouldn't be more then 50 bucks or so . But the type 3 is good for multiple years. It depends how much ammo you would realistically buy... I got them and after about 3 orders of ammo it's already paid for itself. Plus the the convenience, and the govt doesn't know exactly what you have.
     
    Last edited:
    Because you can really tell what port a product came through.?

    What you all may not understand is that the people of California have been taken hostage by a corrupt and mafia like government.

    Most people I talk to dont support the crazy laws and political agendas but the Dems unilaterally control every aspect of the government with no resistance, they control the checks and balances. and they rule with an iron fist. Even if one of their own voices opposition that person will get removed or demoted. and more importantly they control the ballot boxes and who gets elected. On ballots they word things very deceptively and I would bet some foul play like we saw in Florida is also involved as they turn long time red districts blue.

    Imagine DC with no Republicans.

    Then throw in the the mainstream media aka/ Democratic propaganda machine brainwashing everyone with the "illusary Truth Effect"
     
    • Like
    Reactions: MarinePMI
    California has a metric shit ton of people. Many just not outspoken. But either way, $1 for background check then get your ammo 30 secs later, not the worst thing to happen.
    The problem is this will have zero effect on the criminals.
    Just another hoop to clear under the guise of "safety".
    It will not end here, they will "need" another barrier to claim "public safety" and so on.
    I'd buy out of state and they can eat a dick.
    In other words you are being treated as a felon without due process...

    R
     
    On ballots they word things very deceptively and I would bet some foul play like we saw in Florida is also involved as they turn long time red districts blue.

    Then throw in the the mainstream media aka/ Democratic propaganda machine brainwashing everyone with the "illusary Truth Effect"

    They do that with ballot measures everywhere, including here in Florida.

    Here's my rule on ballot measures. I'm a highly educated (doctorate), intelligent dude. If I cannot easily and CLEARLY understand the ballot text, I vote NO. Always. All laws are RESTRICTIVE. So, if I vote NO, then no new restriction. If I cannot understand the VALUE of adding a NEW LAW (aka restriction), because the idiot lawmakers can't write it in plain English, then the answer is NO. No. No. NO!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: gigamortis
    Two people walk into a local big 5 store to buy ammo.

    One a law abiding citizen and one a local gang member.

    How do you propose keeping the gang member from walking out with a box of ammo?
     
    They do that with ballot measures everywhere, including here in Florida.

    Here's my rule on ballot measures. I'm a highly educated (doctorate), intelligent dude. If I cannot easily and CLEARLY understand the ballot text, I vote NO. Always. All laws are RESTRICTIVE. So, if I vote NO, then no new restriction. If I cannot understand the VALUE of adding a NEW LAW (aka restriction), because the idiot lawmakers can't write it in plain English, then the answer is NO. No. No. NO!

    I typically vote No to everything and so do a lot of people.

    Problem is when they deceive the masses with a double negative and no actually means yes.

    Last election we had a vote to repeal a huge gas tax. While 90% supported the repeal. They reworded it to make people think they were voting to repeal when they were actually voting to not to repeal. There were even law suits about it.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: MarinePMI
    I typically vote No to everything and so do a lot of people.

    Problem is when they deceive the masses with a double negative and no actually means yes.

    Last election we had a vote to repeal a huge gas tax. While 90% supported the repeal. They reworded it to make people think they were voting to repeal when they were actually voting to not to repeal. There were even law suits about it.

    In any case, a new law means LESS FREEDOM. So, a double negative that means "yes," means "Yes... we agree to a new law that restricts or regulates something or someone..... even more than before."

    A new law cannot (and will not) grant MORE freedom unless it's to strike down a previous law that infringed our freedom.

    If they cannot ARTICULATE the new RESTRICTION or REGULATION in plain, understandable English, then the answer is a resounding NO from me. Any new law should be able to articulate the VALUE to society. Every new law has a downside. The question is if the UPside outweighs the downsides. If they cannot clearly articulate the upsides, then I can only assume the downsides. Accordingly, I will vote NO.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: clcustom1911
    I typically vote No to everything and so do a lot of people.

    Problem is when they deceive the masses with a double negative and no actually means yes.

    Last election we had a vote to repeal a huge gas tax. While 90% supported the repeal. They reworded it to make people think they were voting to repeal when they were actually voting to not to repeal. There were even law suits about it.
    Yup. The CA state legislature is a bunch of devious fucks who know full well the masses don't read the whole law/proposal verbiage. So, in the title, they just word it as a double negative to get the results they want.

    Perfect example was Proposition 47 aptly named the "Safe Schools and Neighborhoods Act"

    I mean, come on folks, who wouldn't want safe schools and neighborhoods??? It's for the children, right? If they called it "Reclassify Felonies to Misdemeanors and release thousands of felons from Prisons Act" I don't think that would get the vote they wanted............
     
    • Like
    Reactions: MarinePMI
    I typically vote No to everything and so do a lot of people.

    Problem is when they deceive the masses with a double negative and no actually means yes.

    Last election we had a vote to repeal a huge gas tax. While 90% supported the repeal. They reworded it to make people think they were voting to repeal when they were actually voting to not to repeal. There were even law suits about it.
    Bunch damn slaves! That shoulda brought down the thunder!
     
    In any case, a new law means LESS FREEDOM. So, a double negative that means "yes," means "Yes... we agree to a new law that restricts or regulates something or someone..... even more than before."

    A new law cannot (and will not) grant MORE freedom unless it's to strike down a previous law that infringed our freedom.

    If they cannot ARTICULATE the new RESTRICTION or REGULATION in plain, understandable English, then the answer is a resounding NO from me. Any new law should be able to articulate the VALUE to society. Every new law has a downside. The question is if the UPside outweighs the downsides. If they cannot clearly articulate the upsides, then I can only assume the downsides. Accordingly, I will vote NO.

    And like the masses you would have voted to not repeal the $2 gas tax and 20% car registration increase that if you looked at the details is nothing more than a slush fund for the empire.