• Get 25% Off Access To Frank's Online Training

    Use code FRIDAY25 and SATURDAY25 to get 25% off access to Frank’s online training. Want a better deal? Subscribe to get 50% off.

    Get Access Subscribe

The blonde cop who shot a black man-

I was referring to your earlier post. Yes the parking was the catalyst but "trespassing" doesn't remove rights was the point

Pretty sure the prosecutor was willing to overlook the trespassing charge and focus on the murder in cold blood part. Maybe you can write to the state of Texas, and suggest a small fine be added to her sentence along with restoring her right to use deadly force when entering a dwelling that doesn't belong to her. I'm out.
 
Wow. There "are" a few incredibly stupid people posting on this thread. Sort of like her. She'll be fine. Women are nest builders in the state pen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
3c4h3t.jpg
 
Again. It is Dallas. No one sits around with their doors open/unlocked. Strange indeed, of the hundreds of doors in the apartment complex, she chose the one that was open. Bullshit. She went down there, knocked on the door, he opened and she had him at gunpoint.
Do you have any evidence what so ever? Fuck I hate conspiracy theories. Everyone says "no fucking way" but then have absolutely no actual evidence. Factual statements do not start with "I think" or "I believe".

It is possible the victim believed he had shut the door all the way. ( My understanding is the door was locked, just didn't get latched all the way)

Everyday almost everyone has a series of events happen that seem random, but are intertwined. When you go about your day tomorrow, and something happens ask yourself, Would that have happened if I woke up 5 minutes earlier, 5 minutes later?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Anb618
No I didn't and it wouldn't. That was the point.

A person doesn't "lose" a right except by order of a court in the US. No misdemeanor ( intentional or not) could ever rise to that level. Theres no legal vehicle or statute that allows for that. ( at that level)

She was in a place without the right to be there or a reasonable belief that she had a right to be there. As such she had a duty to retreat before using force. So when she intentionally killed someone, it was murder.
 
Do you have any evidence what so ever? Fuck I hate conspiracy theories. Everyone says "no fucking way" but then have absolutely no actual evidence. Factual statements do not start with "I think" or "I believe".

It is possible the victim believed he had shut the door all the way. ( My understanding is the door was locked, just didn't get latched all the way)

Everyday almost everyone has a series of events happen that seem random, but are intertwined. When you go about your day tomorrow, and something happens ask yourself, Would that have happened if I woke up 5 minutes earlier, 5 minutes later?
Nope. I don't have any evidence. Do you have evidence that the door was open? My story makes a whole lot more sense than hers. No conspiracy theory here. A conspiracy is a plan between 2 or more people.
 
As I have posted before, from the get-go there were, and still are, a lot of oddities concerning this case. Eyewitness accounts, take them as you will, stated that Guyger and Jean were arguing before there were gunshots. There were accusations of the two being in a relationship. ALL initial reports had Guyger walking through an unlocked door into Jean's apartment and some reports stated that the door was ajar. If the door was locked Guyger's key would not have worked anyway. There were allegations of Guyger being stoned and that is why she walked into the wrong apartment and missed the huge red door mat. There were comments of Jean being Guyger's dealer.

I don't think we will ever know what the real cause(s) of the shooting were and two lives have been wrecked in the process.
 
Anyone looking for more details, just do some damn research instead of making ridiculous guesses/assumptions. I remember the original news stories when this first happened stated she’d just gotten home from a double shift (or some similar), and they described in detail the layout of her apartment building. Supposedly each apartment level has its own elevated parking attached so all you have to do is get out of your car and you’re on the correct floor. She counted up the wrong number of floors in the parking garage, got out of her car, and went to “her” cookie cutter/identical apartment door. Essentially this guy lived right underneath or above her.

Not making excuses for shooting the man, clearly she f***** up. Nothing brings an innocent man back from the dead, but there doesn’t seem to have been any nefarious intent from what was presented in court or the news (aside from all the “blue woman shoots black man” bullshit). All the talk about her buying weed from/or screwing the guy and it all going wrong is ridiculous.

Ridiculous guesses and assumptions are what keep these threads going. Without it, they would have no entertainment value. ?
 
They don’t sound that ridiculous to me. I don’t buy into everything I hear but I don’t just forget it either. If someone is dealing weed in a apartment complex chances are more than one person in the building is gonna know about it.
 
Maybe give her the Needle?
She would be on the inside looking out as she rode the appeals for many long years at taxpayer expense. No short slap on the wrist.

I'm not saying the punishment fits the crime, just that she ain't walking soon, again, at taxpayer expense.

She will be out in short order time is what I would guess. 2 years max. if that, and time done at the country club not the Gray Bar Hotel.
 
Longer than I thought she would get but short of what I thought she deserved.

Out in less than 5 would be my guess.

How long would it be if it was you or me?


Her life is fucked regardless. The murder charge plus the publicity ensures that her chances of personal/financial stability and being hired anywhere will be slim to none.

She better start learning how to turn tricks. The oldest profession in the world...