• 1 WEEK LEFT: This Target Haunts Me Contest

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

Question about High pressure factors.

Iwillylike2shoot

It's willy fun guys
Minuteman
Dec 6, 2018
147
50
Lincoln, NE
I had a macgowan barrel blank spun up for my 700. It's a 6.5 creedmoor. I am having issues with high pressure. My first few shots were with factory ammo and there were all way over pressure (very difficult bolt lift, hard extraction, plunger flow) then I loaded some middle of the road 130 and 140 gr loads and found they were to hot as well. Different bullet weight/ design seem to produce wildly different results on pressure. My loads now are down at the bottom of the spectrum according to all the published data I have found. Right now I'm thinking it could be a tight bore or a tight spot in the bore. What else could it be?

I'm about ready to just send it in and have it re barreled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iwillylike2shoot
Slow it down.

I mean your patience. I have 5 McGowen barrels. They all exhibit high pressure during break in and they all speed up considerably. On my 6.5 SST barrel I'm down 2grs of powder after 160rds to achieve the same velocity and without pressure. With my 22 BR I'm running 1 gr more powder at a faster velocity, without pressure. If I'd tried to run this load when the barrel was new I pierced primers.

Give it 140 to 180 rds
I have more than that. I think I'm pushing 300 now. I'll check my data book when I get home.
 
LengthNeck DWeb
Loaded Factory GMM1.535.292.464
Fired GMM1.539.296.469
So I found a partially shot box of factory and got some measurements. From my perspective this doesn't look bad but I'm interested to see what you guys think. One other measurement I took was the base to ogive on my hot hand loads and factory ammo. I found that my hot hand loads were 2.195 and the factory is 2.198 so I wonder if my throat is short and I need to seat my bullets back further from the lands like @supercorndogs thought.
 
1574198283062.png



  • Your case web starts .464 and expands to .469, that sounds just fine. Saami chamber max is .471 so you have room there. Coating a piece of fired brass in sharpie and trying to chamber it will show you if its actually too tight for your real world chamber instead of these prints. If it rubs the marker off all the way around the case then you know thats where you have interference rubbing.


  • Your brass neck is .292 and grows to .296. Saami chamber calls for .297 and tapers down to .296 which is what your fired brass is left at. Seems fine to me. You have .004 of clearance between loaded and fired so thats fine.







The case shoulder position is a bit tough to judge off a print when comparing to your comparator numbers. If you have a go gauge I would measure that with your comparator and then see how it compares to your fired brass. Because the comparator inserts can all be slightly off its a relative measurement and not an absolute measurement. In this case the go gauge is known to be 1.630 but it reads 1.624 meaning any measurement you get on your brass is also skewed this much from the real world absolute measurement.
1574198165233.png




  • So your case should be from 1.5438-.007 meaning from 1.5438-1.5367 and your chamber should be from 1.551 to 1.541 when justified to the go gauge. A maximum case can measure 1.5438 and a minimum chamber can measure 1.541 so it is possible for some max-in-spec ammo to not fit in some min-in-spec chambers. You are getting 1.535 which grows to 1.539. Thats not directly comparable to the spec without a go gauge to be certain... but they dont look overly egregious. I would trust what your comparators are telling you in that you have a .004 relative measurement of case growth from virgin to fired.





Now, your bullet ogive measurements. Are you using the same bullet in your reloads that you are in the factory? If not its tough to compare bulletAs position relative to bulletBs. Like needing to measure the go gauge you would need to establish a standard to go off of such as finding your distance to the lands with bulletA and then finding it with bulletB and comparing the difference between the two.

I prefer the wheeler method for finding the lands. Let the materials tell you when they touch themselves instead of your fat monkey fingers trying to gauge it.

 
  • Like
Reactions: aone and reubenski
So I tried those same hand loads yesterday after I seated some 0.015 deeper. I ran 6 through as fast as I could and the first 5 ran fine. The last one was a little sticky but I'm sure the barrel was getting warm at that point. I would say I found my problem. Thanks for all the info though I have learned a lot.