No school in your area, you should get a tax rebate. Class action suits need to started in every school district, that do not hold regular classes!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are the teachers still getting paychecks?
I have a number of friends that are teachers and they have been preparing this summer for both online and in-class options. They are working, at least in my area. However, I will say that I do not put up with their "my job is so stressful/difficult/long hours" bs. You cant take that amount of time off and come to me when I am working 60-70+ hours a week and tell me you have it hard. And none of them offer to help me more than once when they have their summer recess. And I don't want to hear about their "low pay". Lots of people make the same pay and work MUCH harder. I do, however, have a ton of respect for the teachers that do their job well and don't complain about the hours or pay. Everyone knows the score when they go into a career so there is no need to bitch about it. Don't like it? Get out and go find another gig.
My mortgage went up about $150/month to cover the escrow account that pays the insurance on the house and the property taxes, because they're going up... again.
Most of it, to the tune of about $2k+ goes to school taxes. The schools are closed, and shit, we don't even have kids.
Why am I paying for shit that not only I'm not using, but nobody else is using it either?!
Edited to add, maybe if parents had to pay all the property taxes amongst themselves and no kid households were exempt, it would incentivise people to make sure their kids try harder in school, cause sending them isn't 'free' anymore.
Maybe people would have less kids, not a bad thing either.
So did the property owners get a refund on what it cost to operate the busses, HVAC the buildings, the insurance they did not have to carry for the kids, ect? Those costs are huge by the way,....Not really, you are in CO, school didnt stop here, it just went online.
Teachers generally complain about low pay relative to the education requirements of the job. Which are not get a degree and you are set for life. You must continue to get a certain amount of credits per year, and update training to maintain your teaching license. So a comparison they would use would be, a teacher with Masters makes less than a nurse with Masters. Or a teacher with BA makes less than a police office who completed a 6 month course.
IMO: A big portion of the problem has become how much money we force them to put into their education.
So did the property owners get a refund on what it cost to operate the busses, HVAC the buildings, the insurance they did not have to carry for the kids, ect? Those costs are huge by the way,....
Locals set the property tax rate, locals can be voted out of office for failing to adhere to the local voting public. Locals who are voted in run the school districts. Good people need to get involved or quit bitching that there can be nothing done, everything starts locally.I hear what y'all are saying and agree with most of it. But refuse to pay taxes and see what happens. Unless there is a consortium of the overwhelming majority of taxpayers, nothing will change. The governments will be pretty forceful about this as this is a golden opportunity to make up the shortfalls in school district budgets and probably bail out 15-30% of them...
I understand that side of the argument. But there really is no comparison. A nurse works 12 months out of the year. A teacher does not. That alone should account for the pay difference. Both the nurse and the teacher know full well what the education requirements are and the costs associated with those careers are. Its not hidden. If they cant do a basic ROI calculation that's on them. I shouldn't have to pay more because a teacher can't do math.
I'm not trying to run down teachers. We need good ones. I do get pretty pissy about teachers unions demanding more pay, fewer hours, more benefits and teachers protesting at state capitols when in all reality a lot of it has to do with them no longer liking what they agreed to when they took the job. Instead of finding another job or living within their means (!!!!!) they decide to get vocal about their bad choices. Not good. We live in a capitalistic market and there are always options; choosing to not exercise those options and instead just stay in place is their fault and goes nowhere with me.
See, I'm thinking your view is overly complicated, but I may be missing something. I have worked as an EMT and I can tell you that a lot of nurses work a shit-ton of OT, are on their feet all day, deal with assholes spitting on them, cussing them out, blood, feces and all manner of things associated with human health. Teachers could wear the same clothes a couple days in a row.My sister in law is an RN. She worked 3 days per week before having kids. That is 160 days per year. The teachers in this district get 159 day contracts.
The rest of your post is really just a simplistic view of how things work. And the problems are much more complicated than simply, they should have added up the cost of college, or they should live within their means.
College should have never been allowed to get so expensive in the first place. The way college got expensive is socialist, not capitalist. As soon as the government guaranteed loans, the price began to rise and rise. Then they were given a monopoly on a degree, which became a way to hold jobs hostage until people pay. So when I say the cost of education has become one of the problems. I am talking about for everyone, not just teachers.
Have you never asked for a raise? I have and I usually got it.
My mortgage went up about $150/month to cover the escrow account that pays the insurance on the house and the property taxes, because they're going up... again.
Most of it, to the tune of about $2k+ goes to school taxes. The schools are closed, and shit, we don't even have kids.
Why am I paying for shit that not only I'm not using, but nobody else is using it either?!
Edited to add, maybe if parents had to pay all the property taxes amongst themselves and no kid households were exempt, it would incentivise people to make sure their kids try harder in school, cause sending them isn't 'free' anymore.
Maybe people would have less kids, not a bad thing either.
Teachers generally complain about low pay relative to the education requirements of the job. Which are not get a degree and you are set for life. You must continue to get a certain amount of credits per year, and update training to maintain your teaching license. So a comparison they would use would be, a teacher with Masters makes less than a nurse with Masters. Or a teacher with BA makes less than a police office who completed a 6 month course.
IMO: A big portion of the problem has become how much money we force them to put into their education.
You are missing my point, so I will say it more succinctly: Everyone makes a decision to work at their chosen job for pay they find acceptable. That is to say, If you work at a job then on a very primary level you have found the pay and workload acceptable. If not, leave the job. It really is that simple. This is basic microeconomics and we all make this decision multiple times in our lives. I don't see why this is so complicated to understand. Either you find the job acceptable or you don't; and at the point you don't find it acceptable you cue up Johnny Paycheck and roll on. If you hate your job but don't leave it then that means having that job is somehow better emotionally than the options you want to choose (usually fear). But doesn't mean that there aren't options.
Like I said earlier, my beef is not with those who do the job well. I don't appreciate those who take the job and bitch about it. I don't appreciate that characteristic in any person, primarily because they don't work at their job diligently and others have to pick up the slack.
You are 100% correct on all counts. There is risk in changing jobs, and I think that you have hit where Corndogs and I are dropping the ball. Or perhaps its just me in my explanations.Having less kids will actually be the doom of us all because other groups are not slowing down on breeding but speeding up. So, if you want your people to remain a voice you have to have reproduction. Just ask some countries like Italy when everyone ages out. one reason Covid was so bad for them is because the majority of Italy’s pop is older. No kids can be a bad thing and is one reason white people will likely be a minority in like 50 years.
This continued education crap excuse for more pay pisses me off because most of the people that use it somehow think that they are the only ones that have to do this. Every job I’ve ever had requires that you constantly stay up to date and learn new things or programs or whatever. If you don’t you will fall behind and be lucky if they keep you on for the same pay you had. It sucks and I think it’s a major win for employers because they don’t typically pay for it, either by sending you somewhere or by paying for the hours you use outside of work to learn on your own. There are exceptions of course, like aviation mechanics and a slough of other things that most of the time the company sends and pays for your continued education but there are just as many jobs out there where employers don’t. It sucks for everyone. It’s not just a teacher thing, I’m sorry.
It is a simply as leaving a job but it’s not really that simple. If you are the sole provider and let’s be honest, most families require two people to wrk to make ends meet these days, it’s not quite as simple as just leaving. I mean you can but there are lots of considerations. Location, costs, insurance changes, benefits changes, travel time, it will in most cases literally effect everything you do. It’s not an easy decision or move to make unless it’s to the better of your current situation. Let’s say you hate your job, you want to try something new, but you are mid 40’s only have two degrees, know you don’t want to work in those fields. What do you do? You either take a job making less money and benefits somewhere and hope someone gives you the chance to train you up in some skill set. Or, you go back to school for something which will cost you a shit ton of money. Oh and just because you get the degree doesn’t mean you will be any better off or like it any better or even be treated better unless you simply become you own boss. If you got back to school then how are you going to pay for it, raise a family, work a job while doing it and so on in your mid 40’s. Can it be done? Sure. Is it easy? No. Will the pay off be worth it? Not always. And if it’s not you might be $200k farther down a hole than you were. Most people don’t have a couple hundred grand or even $50k laying around to pay to go back to school. If anyone has done the above and simply moved to a new job that was wonderful and paid them handsomely and so on, then bravo, you better count your blessings because that doesn’t happen to most people.
PS Most people don’t have a job that they like. I had one for 10 years that was phenomenal. Enjoyed every minute of it. I was blessed to have it that long. I’m also blessed to have the one I currently have. Depending on your field some jobs are super difficult to get. In fact, the only way I have my current job is through the grace of God. The competition in the field I choose to be in is so steep, I’d literally have better chances of getting drafted into the NFL than getting a position in my field these days. So my point to all of this is, most people need to count their blessings.
Another thing I have noticed, which I think is crazy, is that too much experience and too much education is apparently a bad thing. I couldn’t tell you why as you’d think it was the opposite but employers seem to frown upon it, from my experience. J guess they assume that you will be a know it all or someone that bounces too much or something. I have no idea.
Having less kids will actually be the doom of us all because other groups are not slowing down on breeding but speeding up.
My wife has been busy doing the same as you, prepping for both in class and online teaching. At the moment it looks like it will be both at the same time if the parents are afraid to send their kiddos to school with the rest of the class, etc.I teach at the College level, full-time Professor. We are a NON -tenured institution with a MAJOR feeder to the Military.
I have taught remote (online) from about the second week of Spring. We are transitioning to on campus in seat for the start of our Fall classes.
Let me say... I have been working. I have designed my physical course shell with a hidden re-mote (online) shell JUST IN CASE we are forced to close. We see MANY students that are dual enrolled (high school students taking college courses). There is NOT much we can do if the high schools push a move to close. That is the reason we are prepping a online shell so that we can still reach those students. Zoom...and other video programs have made it business as usual, just on computer.
College expense.... Not all colleges are expensive and D.E (H.S School Students) go to classes FREE OF CHARGE. They pay for NOTHING.
I urge parents to do research on Colleges. We are not all the same. Many of teach the way it was supposed to be done.
Matt
You realize you pay the corporations taxes, right? When you buy their products or services? It's all in the price.
You are taking an idealistic view of what you are calling free market labor. Lets simply look at the, "Coal Creek War" if we want to see what a "free labor market" works like. What we live in is not a free labor market. What we are getting for teachers is anyone with B.A who can grab the job and get away from McDonalds or the check out lane. An entire generation, that has been taught, go to college and make good money, got out of college and found a market with little job opportunity. While they sat on copious amounts of debt. Its funny you sit back and monday morning QB a bunch of 18 year olds that were pushed off to college by their teachers and parents. Who believed it was best for them. "Well they should have done the math."It is not that simple.
Teachers must be paid more so that we attract better talent and talent not almost 100% left-leaning. And I mean significantly more.
they also protect the incompetent and the unwilling. have to keep those dues coming in. don't forget supporting the union leaders in their lavish lifestyles. workers of the world unite. thank you Karl. may I have another.Is anyone surprised the tearcher's unions want less work, yet more pay and more benefits? That is ALWAYS the case with them. They are always underpaid, overworked, and underappreciated (according to them).
Considering they are in great part responsible for the social strife occurring in our country right now, due to their leftist indoctrination of students over the last few decades, FUCK THEM.
I have worked in several fields, and the "update training" is nothing compared to maintaining your teaching license in Colorado, and its only getting tougher. Its not as thought these requirements are sitting still. The bar is continually being set higher. I have also never had to pay, and was paid for my time when doing update training, as well as being put up in a motel room and given a per diem.
The argument for or against more pay is not even yours to make. So you crow about how they get too much already, but you don't know. Its funny to watch people who have no idea what a teacher does, crow about their pay being plenty, when they would have to go to google to see how much an average teacher even gets paid. Its funny culture we have of shitting on the little guys. Helps keep the elites, elite.
Its funny most places give you a raise every year. But teachers, "they don't need no stinking raise." Remember that next time you get a raise chief.
Take a look at the Universities and you'll see all that gets you is very highly paid communist indoctrinators.
I was fortunate enough to mostly have teachers that understood the concept of critical thinking and debate and didn't overtly interject their personal opinion. And if they had a personal opinion, they weren't thin skinned if I challenged it with facts. If I challenged anything with whining or BS, well... I learned not to.
Consider yourself lucky. A lot of people have to pay their own way in this “update training” you are talking about. And I can say in a number of fields, it’s constant training. I am also on the fence about whether or not we should pay more to attract people. On one hand I can see your point about needing to pay more to attract better people. The policing field is one where this really comes to mind. On the other hand, whatever happened to people making an honest wage and taking pride in what they do instead of bitching and moaning about how they aren’t getting enough?
Most jobs, in order to get paid more, you have to deliver, then you might get rewarded for your efforts. But it seems we have somehow flipped this mentality in some cases to where it’s, if you want good people then you have to pay up front. That seems like gambling to me. What makes a person good before they have proven themselves? Just because you give someone a good salary doesn’t mean they are worth a shit. That’s a huge risk on the company side. My wife’s company is bad about this. Lucky for them it works out but it pisses me off to no end when I hear about executives at her job having to get like $60,000 bonuses as incentives to doing their jobs. What about the 6 figure salary they already make as an incentive to do their job? They better be glad they don’t work for me because if I was paying that kind of money and then found out I need to give them another $50,000-$60,000 to get them to do the job they should already be doing then I’d tell them to GTFO.
I’d say on the aspect of teaching that there is a lot outside their control as well, as in teaching methods/styles and what they can teach that all plays a part in how well the performance of the teacher can be. But I don’t know how one could justify paying them better money unless they deliver some kind of results first. Unfortunately, teaching, like in a lot of jobs, may be locked in a position to where you can work your ass off and never get much credit for it due to factors outside of your control.
The truth is, this is not an easy discussion with easy answers and can be extrapolated to many other fields aside from teachers. What I do know is that the ones getting squeezed have to make a living as well and can only be squeezed so much. I’m also curious as to how much more we need to pay teachers? What’s the number? $10,000 more, $50,000 more? What is it? I also know that a lot of them fail to mention, that they have some of the best benefits there is. Their health insurance in our state is the best money can buy, not to mention their guaranteed retirement. So in a sense they are already being paid better than most. People often overlook, myself included, benefits as part of their overall pay.