Seems a shame to arrest a woman just for having a gay boyfriend.
Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1
- Thread starter Snake-Eyes
- Start date
-
- Tags
- motivational pictures
That never happened once when I was …..
Nevermind.
Has never happened.
What is wrong with dudes?
Thats more pussified than just gay. Even gay dudes like to get off.
Nevermind.
Has never happened.
What is wrong with dudes?
Thats more pussified than just gay. Even gay dudes like to get off.
Wanna know how I know your pussy stank?
With that kind of trigger discipline I hope he never, ever handles a loaded firearm. If a group of colleagues takes him out to a range trip, you KNOW he is going to end up shooting somebody...
I don't think he ever shouldered the rifle.
If you look at photos from the night of the shootings, there is an optic mounted on the rifle.
thats not Kyle's rifle. I asked the same thing and was told the prosecutor just had an AR in the courtroom for dramatic effect and it backfired.
Hammocks holding on with all its might, would still bang. They obviously share, and look hungry....
Bet that ankle monitor kept digging into his calf...some guys are too sensitive.
- Mar 15, 2018
- 1,361
- 5,376
What they mean is they want to corner the market. No firearms go south unless they are the ones handing them out.
*COUGH FASTANDFURIOUS COUGH*
This is a good movie @atfhq, I really think you'll like it.
I never look into this shit but I can’t sleep and was curious. Apparently she was drunk, scratching him, and ripping his shirt. He wimped out. Sounds like fun to me, I’ve been scratched so hard during sex it drew blood, no complaints.
she pretended to be unconscious and when the officer started checking on her she spit in his face.....and battery charge unlocked.
Article had her non-drunk photo also.
Last edited:
That is kyle's rifle, the optic is a separate piece of evidence that was shown earlier because it was an issue in the case due to people claiming he was "pounting the laser on his gun at them" and the gun didnt even have a laser... and the defense and prosecution kept saying the optic would have the laser lol.
For real, the gun discussions and bullet discussions in this case were a crime all on their own.
I would wager that none of the people who claimed there was a laser, were NOT charged with perjury. One side is simply allowed to lie without consequences.
I think you'd be amazed how awful this was if you go watch the trial. As bad as you THINK, it was 50 times worse. This trial destroyed the final tiny shreds of faith I had in our system. I am talking police, prosecutors, witnesses etc outright lying about what was JUST PLAYED on a video in front of everyone.
It's unreal.
Got one of these and another Ramset, trigger fired model in my toolbag along with a ton of yellow and green .22 blanks. Use them all the time on the job. They are fun...
One of the new guys saw me using it, asked to borrow it. After just 2 minutes of me giving a basic rundown of how it works, he was setting studs into concrete like a pro... Never even looked at the Paslodes the shop used again. He got his own Ramset the next day.
I was involved in a Motor Vehicle Accident (MVA) case once, where the well funded defense presented a video of the "Our driver" at a later date driving fast and recklessly. They had been video stalking the him for weeks, hoping to find a jewel for their case. The Private Investigator (PI) swore under oath they had followed the Our driver, and this was real and actual video of him. We let them roll with it. Then we destroyed them with photographs of the car which is owned by the Our driver. It was different than the one in the video. They had set up a staged video, and hoped we would not notice it was one model year different (third tail light in the body, as versus in the rear window).
As a consequence the judge "allowed" the senior opposing attorney to "retire" from the case, and they quickly moved towards a settlement. This is an example of what normally happens when an attorney is caught portraying or purveying false information. As they were being sued for losses, simply dismissing or retrying the case would have harmed the wrong party. Normally, there is some measure of shame when they are caught with their hands in the cookie jar. They also know that any future case presented before that judge, will be met with a reasonable measure of skepticism. Once proven a liar, it is a taint which is hard to remove. It was also well understood the PI testimony would never be allowed in his court, ever.
As a consequence the judge "allowed" the senior opposing attorney to "retire" from the case, and they quickly moved towards a settlement. This is an example of what normally happens when an attorney is caught portraying or purveying false information. As they were being sued for losses, simply dismissing or retrying the case would have harmed the wrong party. Normally, there is some measure of shame when they are caught with their hands in the cookie jar. They also know that any future case presented before that judge, will be met with a reasonable measure of skepticism. Once proven a liar, it is a taint which is hard to remove. It was also well understood the PI testimony would never be allowed in his court, ever.
Last edited:
