Recent content by Jonnyb0381

I agree and also they are also biased about other brands other than what they own, as well as looking for a reason not to like or nitpicking other brands they do not have.

BTW if you paid $1,550 for a MK 5 7-35 You got it for a steal!

I second this a lot of shooters are willing to pay extra for the reliability and brand name but hey, just because I woulnt pay 3K for a NF doesnt mean they arent worth that much because obviously a lot of people like them and are willing to pay that price.

Steller review! I couldnt be happier with my ZP5. I love everything about it. Im confident in saying that when this scope falls into more shooters hands that people will fall in love with it as I have.

Luepold MK5 CCH Minox ZP5 MR 4

I think optics sales in general arent what they used to be, especially for high end optics. With that said, I can certainly see TT prices dropping.

I agree with this. The Minox is quite a bit better optically than the ATACR 5-25 and still edges the 7-35 ATACR but not by a lot.

???

Most likely. Its funny how most are willing to pay extra for something that is comparable just for the brand recognition/popularity. Yes, they have a longer and proven track record but if people take some time to do some research or better yet (pick up a ZP5) and compare, the scopes speak for...

I talked to the rep at Blazer and he said they will be going back to regular price after the promotion has ended.

I just bought one used. It is a fantastic scope! I couldnt be happier with it ?

I would think that only the best glass would cut through mirage like that, like Schott glass. TT, ZCO, Minox and probably a few others. But Im no scope expert however, Ive heard of such scopes cutting through bad mirage.

I was happy with my Mark 5. The turrets were surprisingly audible and tactile. Great glass, tracked true. My only gripe was the FOV was kinda poor imo. Loved everything else.

[QUOTE="Westernhntr, post:

I agree with this 110%