Recent content by Solid7

I find it odd, given that Joe's initial stance was that he wanted to make any gun that was black and scary, an NFA item - and his campaign even mentioned, "just like supressors". Political theater is one possibility, moving goalposts is another. Aiming for this, but knowing that you'll get...

Hopefully somebody will politely DM you, and inform you that you posted something really fucking stupid right there. Cause it's a really big Derp!

I didn't attack. I offered a different perspective. I forgot that some people don't know how to have a conversation, but get "offended" when somebody doesn't absolutely agree with them. The error was totally mine.

Yes, but if I explain myself, and you still insist on not believing what I say, because it's not what you want to believe that I said, then you can't be helped. I'm sorry that you can't digest logic that isn't the equivalent of pre-chewed food. But I have no beef with gun owners (I said that...

No shit, Sherlock. And it's not incorrect. "Gun owner" and "undesirable" are not inseparable terms. Every "undesirable gun owner" will seek refuge with those who are "not undesirable gun owners". Or if those words are too hard for your decipher, then let's try this - YOU WILL GET THE GOOD...

Don't try to strong arm me with faulty logic. The issue is the movement of people, based on the sanctuary status. I have zero problem with any state wanting to provide protections for gun owners. I am a gun owner, and I support (to the death) legal firearm ownership. I am realistic, and know...

Prime example of dumbfuckery, right there ( ^^^^^). Misunderstand the premise, then jump straight off a conclusion cliff. For everyone who isn't dumb - no, gun owners aren't automatically considered undesirables. But any portion, of any group of people, is going to contain some undesirables...

To that point - it's true that any state that becomes a haven, is going to inherit every undesirable that seeks sanctuary. If weed were legal in all 50, of course, Colorado wouldn't have attracted every stoner on both sides of the Rockies. So it's actually a very valid point.

Nope. Opiates and Cannabinoids keep people placated. Those are key cogs in the machine. (even though I tend to view cannabis at the same level as alcohol, point remains) If that ever happens, you can bet your ass it will be enforced, unlike immigration, drug abuse, or sexual predation.

The first thing we need to ban, is comprehensive legislation. If these fuckwits have to focus on quality over quantity, they won't be able to increase bullshit legislation at an exponential rate. Clearly, at the point that it comes to even discussing a ban on suppressors, it's WAY too easy to...

I resolved that conundrum by only using mine for culling hogs. There's no sport in that, anyway. It's just killing for a cause. The person who goes to the summit, but never forgets where he's from. All roads lead back home. (#2)

There are some who live their entire existence, wanting to be at the summit, for no reason, but the prestige of the feat. There are others who want to conquer it, and bring what they find, back down with them, to help embolden or enrich others. And yet others, never even attempt the climb...

No, please tell me more about this. I'm intrigued.

I don't know of anyone who isn't a product of their own ego. You seem to be rather supportive of the 45th POTUS. I have a hard time believing that you aren't OK with (at least some) people being ego-driven, on that basis, alone. My issue is more with people who don't aspire to be all that they...

My point has plenty of merit, in that those schools are not the same today, because none of the levels of education that precedes them, is the same. Simple as. That's why I took exception to the person touting their "classical education". Nobody in this room has a "classical education", in...