hopium or another kraken sighting?
Trump is back…the “Now What” thread
- Thread starter D̷e̷v̷i̷l̷D̷o̷c̷A̷Z̷
- Start date
Waltz, Netanyahu held Iran strike discussions behind Trump's back - report
This comes after the former National Security chief added the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic to a group chat that contained military strike plans on Yemen.
www.jpost.com
she's such a retard.
she brings up strollers (made in china), which some people have to buy maybe once or twice in their lifetime.
meanwhile she has nothing to say about gasoline (or eggs) that almost everyone has to buy regularly.
imo, our state department should confirm this and present the evidence to the public in those countries.
no doubt the regimes he helped to install will not share it.
no doubt the regimes he helped to install will not share it.
I got two seconds in. I can't watch that dumb bitch.
It's pretty funny that the libs/msm keep falling for the same gags from Trump.
My wife tells a story about when she was a kid, her younger brother would sometimes get so enraged that he would charge her with the intent of harming her. She would make a fist, straighten her arm and lock her elbow. The dumb bastard would repeatedly run at her and directly into her fist. libs/msm aren't any different.
Like Strock that got 1.2M? HRC, Clapper, Obama arrested? Come on man. What happened to the FBI agent that lied to get the FISA warrants? Answer: absolutely nothing!
Why would President Trump grant that Democrat whore an interview in the first place?
My parents never owned a stroller. Mom carried us until we could walk, then we did.
not sure if this is why they are "hiding".
US Creates New Military Zone Along Southern Border | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
There's a five year statute of limitations for federal crime in DC.
I figured that most of you could remember that. Especially after the Durham debacle.
Like I said before, needs to extend all the way to Brownsville.US Creates New Military Zone Along Southern Border | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Let's try using our troops for our own protection for a change.
"The President’s proposal is not a serious one," she said in a post on X.' Nancy Pelosi (W)
So now the drunken democrat whore tells us what is to be taken seriously?
So now the drunken democrat whore tells us what is to be taken seriously?
White House Says It Has “No Timeline” for Releasing Epstein Files (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
The White House admitted it has “no specific timeline” for releasing the remaining Jeffrey Epstein files. It can be recalled that last month, President Donald Trump was asked point-blank about the long-awaited release of documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein during a swearing-in ceremony for Paul...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Q: mr. President, don’t you need to uphold the constitution?
A: I don’t know
This loser is either as dumb as a stump or a traitor
A: I don’t know
This loser is either as dumb as a stump or a traitor
DHS promotes CBP whistleblowers demoted after warning about lack of DNA collection on illegals
Whistleblowers who were retaliated against for years for sounding the alarm about DHS failures to collect DNA samples on illegal aliens have now seen their ill fortunes reversed under the new Trump administration with promotions by CBP.
justthenews.com
https://apnews.com/article/trump-im...rder-illegal-c459325c4a73dba0d5a89fa19dbee334
How about 100$ for every illegal you turn in that gets arrested. Up it to 500$ if a gang member.
Money talks
How about 100$ for every illegal you turn in that gets arrested. Up it to 500$ if a gang member.
Money talks
They sliced this interview on YT to make it sound like he was refusing the illegals due process of the Constitution. He needs to sue for another 15M.
Non citizens have NO “Due Process” of the Constitution. That right is reserved for legal citizens of this country only.
The msm has been playing that game, trying to get people to believe that illegals do have that right. In fact, non citizens do not “enjoy” any of the rights in the Bill of Rights, as guaranteed by the Constitution.
Does an illegal alien get full protection of our Constitution .
Shouldn't.
The terrorists gangs, enemy combatant rules. Two center mass and a controll is all I would afford them. Probably just let them lie and rot in place as a warning.
Or put thier head on a pike all along the border.
Shouldn't.
The terrorists gangs, enemy combatant rules. Two center mass and a controll is all I would afford them. Probably just let them lie and rot in place as a warning.
Or put thier head on a pike all along the border.
Kash Patel doesn't seem the type to get jammed by anyone. Story sounds spun up? to me.
Well not being a constitutional lawyer, I looked up a few things and first of all the AI generated shit seemed written by a liberal whore.
Then I found this, and well it's written by lawyers for lawyers trying to soak both sides of a case for as much cash as possible regardless of an outcome since niether side give one tiney little shit about thier client except for being a cash cow.
Shisten, nix shisten oun or nine?
[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
In 1903, the Court in the Japanese Immigrant Case reviewed the legality of deporting an alien who had lawfully entered the United States, clarifying that an alien who has entered the country, and has become subject in all respects to its jurisdiction, and a part of its population could not be deported without an opportunity to be heard upon the questions involving his right to be and remain in the United States.1 In the decades that followed, the Supreme Court maintained the notion that once an alien lawfully enters and resides in this country he becomes invested with the rights guaranteed by the Constitution to all people within our borders.2
Eventually, the Supreme Court extended these constitutional protections to all aliens within the United States, including those who entered unlawfully, declaring that aliens who have once passed through our gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness encompassed in due process of law.3 The Court reasoned that aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognized as persons guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.4 Thus, the Court determined, [e]ven one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.5 Accordingly, notwithstanding Congress’s indisputably broad power to regulate immigration, fundamental due process requirements notably constrained that power with respect to aliens within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.6
Yet the Supreme Court has also suggested that the extent of due process protection may vary depending upon [the alien’s] status and circumstance.7 In various opinions, the Court has suggested that at least some of the constitutional protections to which an alien is entitled may turn upon whether the alien has been admitted into the United States or developed substantial ties to this country.8 Thus, while the Court has recognized that due process considerations may constrain the Federal Government’s exercise of its immigration power, there is some uncertainty regarding the extent to which these constraints apply with regard to aliens within the United States.
Then I found this, and well it's written by lawyers for lawyers trying to soak both sides of a case for as much cash as possible regardless of an outcome since niether side give one tiney little shit about thier client except for being a cash cow.
Shisten, nix shisten oun or nine?
ArtI.S8.C18.8.7.2 Aliens in the United States
Article I, Section 8, Clause 18:[The Congress shall have Power . . . ] To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
In 1903, the Court in the Japanese Immigrant Case reviewed the legality of deporting an alien who had lawfully entered the United States, clarifying that an alien who has entered the country, and has become subject in all respects to its jurisdiction, and a part of its population could not be deported without an opportunity to be heard upon the questions involving his right to be and remain in the United States.1 In the decades that followed, the Supreme Court maintained the notion that once an alien lawfully enters and resides in this country he becomes invested with the rights guaranteed by the Constitution to all people within our borders.2
Eventually, the Supreme Court extended these constitutional protections to all aliens within the United States, including those who entered unlawfully, declaring that aliens who have once passed through our gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness encompassed in due process of law.3 The Court reasoned that aliens physically present in the United States, regardless of their legal status, are recognized as persons guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.4 Thus, the Court determined, [e]ven one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.5 Accordingly, notwithstanding Congress’s indisputably broad power to regulate immigration, fundamental due process requirements notably constrained that power with respect to aliens within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.6
Yet the Supreme Court has also suggested that the extent of due process protection may vary depending upon [the alien’s] status and circumstance.7 In various opinions, the Court has suggested that at least some of the constitutional protections to which an alien is entitled may turn upon whether the alien has been admitted into the United States or developed substantial ties to this country.8 Thus, while the Court has recognized that due process considerations may constrain the Federal Government’s exercise of its immigration power, there is some uncertainty regarding the extent to which these constraints apply with regard to aliens within the United States.
How is that KY has a Republican majority in the State Govt, yet it is governed by a Democrat?
Couple of things on this:
-just like with Reagan, any economic changes take time to manifest. It may be the correct decision, but there is pain in the intermediate steps. That requires adults who can see the big picture and endure the pain for the benefit of the next generation.
-Those opposed will focus those with short term goals on the pain. They will vote in the midterms on that.
How many people can give up today for tomorrow? That’s the question. Back in the day it was an easy answer, today both have become synonymous, albeit incorrectly.
It's says those that passed through our "gates". They came in legally and overstayed their Visa. It doesn't cover those that crossed into the USA illegally in the back of cars or across the river or anywhere else. Only those that came through a legal point of entry. When they came to the legal point of entry, "gate", they were given permission to enter for a time period.
This is exactly why they were granting amnesty to them over the last several years.
Similar threads
