Anyone shoot AAC 6.5cm ammo?

theHerder

Private
Minuteman
Oct 30, 2021
49
23
AK
Have seen reviews on AAC ammo (some good, some not) but none on their 6.5CM ammo. Seems to be a decent price if it shoots. My LaRue loves the Hornady 120-140gr factory ammo. Anyone shot the AAC 6.5 cm ammo, either the "Sabre" or the SMK's?

Thanks!
 
New here but I have a POF Prescott I have been waiting to put some more rounds through before posting a review.

I had some good groups with their 6.5 but I will say the Sabre black tip line was the worst of the bunch for me but still very acceptable for “defensive” ammo.

I have shot their 140 BTHP:

IMG_1516.jpeg

140 Sabre Black tip
IMG_1514.jpeg

140 SMK
IMG_1513.jpeg
 
Last edited:
New here but I have a POF Prescott I have been waiting to put some more rounds through before posting a review.

I had some good groups with their 6.5 but I will say the Sabre black tip line was the worst of the bunch for me but still very acceptable for “defensive” ammo.

I have shot their 140 BTHP:

View attachment 8258852

140 Sabre Black tip
View attachment 8258853

140 SMK
View attachment 8258854
Man that Prescott looks like it shoots pretty well. I've been thinking about getting one myself. Are you having any issues with it? Does it beat up brass like most Creedmoor ARs?
 
So
Man that Prescott looks like it shoots pretty well. I've been thinking about getting one myself. Are you having any issues with it? Does it beat up brass like most Creedmoor ARs?
Yeah, for the money I’m impressed with the precision. I’ve only shot it suppressed and immediately added a superlative agb but still getting some beat up brass. My suppressor is an Enticer-L so it adds a good amount of back pressure. I’m planning on playing with the buffer weight a bit as well just haven’t had time yet. I never shot it stock so unsure what it would do out of the box but given it’s a rifle length 20inch barrel I’d say it’s prolly similar to other traditional 6.5 gassers.

I’ll have a full write up on it once I get to the ~400-500 round range I’m only around the 150 rounds in so far.
 
Did it not come with the Dictator AGB? Also is the gas tube length Rifle, not +1 or +2?

I had a 6mm Creedmoor +1 and it seemed like it was extracting too early, bending the rims.
 
mine did not, I don’t believe the rogue or prescott come with agbs. It is rifle length wish it was +1 but unfortunately not. I was just gonna cut it down to 18 but it shoots so well and the flutes are likley too deep to make that work.
 
Any updates on this? Only accuracy report seems they aren't great for precision. Anyone else have opposite experience? I bought 50 boxes to try. For the price there's not much else that comes close. If they don't work great for long range precision I'll use them in my MDRx for hogs and coyotes.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Genesis1984
How did the Sabre shoot? Tempted to buy some smk as well but maybe should just see how the Sabre shoots first
The Sabre shoots well. I mostly shoot steel out to 600yds at my local range. I haven't measured the groups from the Sabre, but 1 MOA steel targets are easy to hit. I only shot the SMK stuff at the electronic target because someone else at the range had one and invited me to play because he was interested in how the AAC stuff grouped. You absolutely cannot go wrong for the price. To shoot better, you'd need to work up a load and do a lot of handloading. For my purpose, it's as good as it gets for the money.

I should add that I've shot a bunch of the .308 stuff as well and I'm equally impressed. I haven't reloaded the cases or measured water capacity yet, but the empty case weights are very consistent. I'd bet the cases are equal in quality to something like Starline, which I like.
 
I've just started using AAC ammo this year and all the SMK offerings shoot very well (.75 or less) especially through my custom Bartlein Barrels, from .556, .308 and 6.5CM

I've also found the 5.56 Saber Black tips to be very consistent in my SBR's and "Blaster Rifles" Suppressed and Unsurpressed, I own a few LWRC DI rifles that shoot it quite well.

This is one of my my newest LWRC's its a 10.5" pistol that's just waiting for the SBR paperwork to come back. I ran 60rds of the 5.56 77gr SMK through it the first day I picked it up. 3 10rd groups and they were all under 1MOA.
20240913_192708.jpg
 
Just ordered 500 rounds of the ACC 77 grain OTM. Got great reviews, hope it shoots that well, I'll get back when I have shot some.
 
I put around 800 rounds of the AAC 140gr bullets through my criterion barrel AR10 last year. They all shot well at 100 yards but once I got out to around 750-1300 I noticed the consistency shot to shot dropped off. I suspect the SD's were really high but I didn't have a chronograph to verify it with. One round would be spot on the next one would be like 4 feet low. I would recommend it for plinking if it is still cheap and plentiful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maggot
I put around 800 rounds of the AAC 140gr bullets through my criterion barrel AR10 last year. They all shot well at 100 yards but once I got out to around 750-1300 I noticed the consistency shot to shot dropped off. I suspect the SD's were really high but I didn't have a chronograph to verify it with. One round would be spot on the next one would be like 4 feet low. I would recommend it for plinking if it is still cheap and plentiful.
My experience as well. Had a sd of 130 in 50 rounds. Some would just be way off
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jdowns0415
AAC ammo is a fantastic value across multiple calibers. Was shooting the 6.5 CM 140 BTHP ammo out of my Tikka TAC A1 a couple of days ago. (So not a gas gun). No long range shooting, but at 100 yards I was getting pretty consistent .5-.7" five shot groups. Not aware of any other 6.5cm ammo that costs $1 a round that can come close. Just bought 200 rounds of the AAC 6.5 SMK ammo. Curious if the extra .10 per round will buy me even better results.

I only have regular access to a range that goes to 600, so if it can hold its accuracy at that distance it works for me.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Genesis1984
This thread is rediculous. A forum dedicated to serious shooters, with supposedly seriously nice rifles, and were giving a pass to clearly junk ammo cuz its.. cheap? I mean, aac ammo is known to ruin suppressors, cause failure to fire, be wildly inconsistent and on and on.. but lets run it cuz its... 4 cents cheaper (or some rediculous amount) less than good ammo? Come on guys
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sum Ting Wong
Shoot more rounds, I can guarantee you that ES will go up. How many did you sample?
8 rounds. Velocity has been consistent across this case of ammo whenever I had the chrono out while shooting. I’ve made hits to a 10” plate at 363 yards easily with tight groups. My gun just really likes it and I got lucky. But to sit here and say it’s shit ammo just shows you don’t know what you’re talking about and likely don’t have first hand experience. It shoots very well in 2 of my rifles. In another not so great. Each rifle likes different ammo. My 6.5 prc hate Berger hybrids but loves ELDs. Does that mean Berger bullets are shit? No, it doesn’t.
 
8 rounds. Velocity has been consistent across this case of ammo whenever I had the chrono out while shooting. I’ve made hits to a 10” plate at 363 yards easily with tight groups. My gun just really likes it and I got lucky. But to sit here and say it’s shit ammo just shows you don’t know what you’re talking about and likely don’t have first hand experience. It shoots very well in 2 of my rifles. In another not so great. Each rifle likes different ammo. My 6.5 prc hate Berger hybrids but loves ELDs. Does that mean Berger bullets are shit? No, it doesn’t.
Lol why are you butt hurt? Nobody said it is shit ammo. Go quote me where I did. But do show us a sample size of 50 with an ES under 10. Eight rounds is pretty insignificant, and a 10 plate at 363 is huge.
 
Lol why are you butt hurt? Nobody said it is shit ammo. Go quote me where I did. But do show us a sample size of 50 with an ES under 10. Eight rounds is pretty insignificant, and a 10 plate at 363 is huge.
I didn’t say it was a 10” group just that’s my target at 363 yards. The group size was under 3”. Why the hell would someone waste 50 rounds to determine ES? Even on my competition rifles I measure ES with less than 10 rounds. You’re not going to see one round randomly shoot 50 fps higher. If you don’t want to use the ammo then don’t. Buts it’s very good ammo even if it was more expensive I’d still buy it
 
I didn’t say it was a 10” group just that’s my target at 363 yards. The group size was under 3”. Why the hell would someone waste 50 rounds to determine ES? Even on my competition rifles I measure ES with less than 10 rounds. You’re not going to see one round randomly shoot 50 fps higher. If you don’t want to use the ammo then don’t. Buts it’s very good ammo even if it was more expensive I’d still buy it

I gather my data over long strings while I'm shooting an event, plinking for fun, or competing, etc. That is how I end up with data of over 50+ rounds. I'm not saying go waste 50 rounds on a berm just to gather data. All I was simply saying is, to say that the AAC ammo has an ES at or under 10 with a sample size that small is probably insignificant and not conclusive of how that ammo performs in general.

It is still factory mass produced ammo at the end of the day. I'd be happy to be proven wrong if someone wants to post up chrono data. Good that it shoots small for you though. I wasn't trying to ruffle any feathers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flogxal and BurtG
8 rounds. Velocity has been consistent across this case of ammo whenever I had the chrono out while shooting. I’ve made hits to a 10” plate at 363 yards easily with tight groups. My gun just really likes it and I got lucky. But to sit here and say it’s shit ammo just shows you don’t know what you’re talking about and likely don’t have first hand experience. It shoots very well in 2 of my rifles. In another not so great. Each rifle likes different ammo. My 6.5 prc hate Berger hybrids but loves ELDs. Does that mean Berger bullets are shit? No, it doesn’t.
Ya, aac ammo literally has a history of damaging cans, cases blowing out, etc. Im not rich enough to buy cheap ammo. If you are, good on ya. I know, i know, "but not muh 6.5" genuinely do not care. There are absolutely too many reputable brands out there to save 3 dollars a box on a chance. Given psas history with.. well, literally everything.. its a pass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flogxal
Ya, aac ammo literally has a history of damaging cans, cases blowing out, etc. Im not rich enough to buy cheap ammo. If you are, good on ya. I know, i know, "but not muh 6.5" genuinely do not care. There are absolutely too many reputable brands out there to save 3 dollars a box on a chance. Given psas history with.. well, literally everything.. its a pass.
I assume you’re referring to a batch of 223 ammo that had defective bullets? Can you post your source of this issue with 6.5mm bullets we are discussing here please?

All ammo manufacturers have had issues. I’ve had hornady ammo loaded too hot have case head separation. Should I no longer by hornady? When you shoot as much as I do you’ll run into issues with any brand eventually. I trust AAC enough to hunt with it if that says anything. I’m not exactly new to the game.
 
Ya, aac ammo literally has a history of damaging cans, cases blowing out, etc. Im not rich enough to buy cheap ammo. If you are, good on ya. I know, i know, "but not muh 6.5" genuinely do not care. There are absolutely too many reputable brands out there to save 3 dollars a box on a chance. Given psas history with.. well, literally everything.. its a pass.
It's like their 77gr 5.56, when it first was released, way too hot. Okay, great speed numbers. OOPS my bolt! OOPS my can! Is it that much cheaper than the next cheap decent round, IMI RazorCore? No.

Norma Golden Target is the call if you are on a budget. If your standards are relaxed, Hornady American Gunner 140gr BTHP is decent, I've shot it in regional PRS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Genesis1984
I assume you’re referring to a batch of 223 ammo that had defective bullets? Can you post your source of this issue with 6.5mm bullets we are discussing here please?

All ammo manufacturers have had issues. I’ve had hornady ammo loaded too hot have case head separation. Should I no longer by hornady? When you shoot as much as I do you’ll run into issues with any brand eventually. I trust AAC enough to hunt with it if that says anything. I’m not exactly new to the game.
Note where i said "do not care its supposedly not 6.5" (paraphrasing). Psa makes junk and im not willing to chance it. You are. Good on ya. No, "all ammo manufacturers issues" dont blow up guns. We arent talking inaccurate rounds, or extreme deviation in velocity. Etc. We are literally talking about damaged equipment and potential safety issues. If it had been 1 gun, sure, we could argue "hey things happen". This is a plethora. With all the reputable ammo makers out there, why bother. Ive got some garbage zsr 308 ammo that might blow up your gun ill sell ya cheap, If you want, too. (Thats how i got this admittedly dour opinion on cheap ammo, actually.) Ive teied buying cheap guns, ammo, accesories. A lot of it from psa, actually. Im a slow learner, but i did learn. I genuinely hope you or your equipment arent injured learning that same lesson (thats genuine, btw, no snark intended at all).