• Online Training Rescheduled: Join Us Next Week And Get 25% Off Access

    Use code FRIDAY25 and SATURDAY25 to get 25% off access to Frank’s online training. Want a better deal? Subscribe to get 50% off.

    Get Access Subscribe

We may finally know who’s been to the island

luckily we know the fbi would never alter any evidence.

EvEcKZLFwbTx.jpeg
 
Saw this on X so I googled it.

View attachment 8729243

This is what I got in the AI overview. Strange.
View attachment 8729244
Yeah the thing I will say is if this was the case, why sue? Right? Like why not go to criminal court?

The reason is this: suits require less evidence.

It like if I say you touched so and sos butthole, and you deny it, but then I ask one of my other friends to back me up as a “witness” that’s all it takes to win a lawsuit.

I say this not for Trump, but in ANY case that people try to say that a lawsuit is equal to a crime committed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 232593 and DuneBoer
Yeah the thing I will say is if this was the case, why sue? Right? Like why not go to criminal court?

The reason is this: suits require less evidence.

It If I say you touched so and sos butthole, and you deny it, but then I ask one of my other friends to back me up as a “witness” that’s all it takes to win a lawsuit.

I say this not for Trump, but in ANY case that people try to say that a lawsuit is equal to a crime committed.
Yeah the thing I will say is if this was the case, why sue? Right? Like why not go to criminal court?

The reason is this: suits require less evidence.

It If I say you touched so and sos butthole, and you deny it, but then I ask one of my other friends to back me up as a “witness” that’s all it takes to win a lawsuit.

I say this not for Trump, but in ANY case that people try to say that a lawsuit is equal to a crime committed.
Criminal cases must be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Civil case guilty by the preponderance of evidence.

Statute of limitations can play a part but for federal case of rape there is no SOL. NY state law is 20 years I think. Civil can cases go away with a big check.

I just thought it was weird what the google AI said.
 
And if any of that was true why didn’t Brandon and Kamala use it prior to the last election? Their AG had the same info as Bondi. Why wasn’t it used in the 2016 election?

Everyone trots this out as if the dems wouldn't gladly shield a pedophile to protect their donors just like Trump would shield a pedophile to protect his donors.

Note, they're largely the same donors.

The dems are just as opportunistic as anyone in the GOP they're all just wringing their hands watching and waiting for the right time to make a move and seize their own moments. None of what any of these people across any of these constituencies have any character Trump included.

Noone seems to assess character though everyone is so focused on the stream of unending horse shit these people are selling they completely ignore the character whenever it lines up with whatever story they've signed up for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: st1650
None of that would have mattered to Brandon or Kamala. ESPECIALLY from 2021 through the end of 2022 when their party had complete control over all three branches of government. Why did they have to generate all those bullshit charges in NY to convict him if they had that Epstein list handy. Shit, if he was on the list why not blackmail him to stay out of the race altogether?

I also have to question, what do you think Brandon or Kamala LOSE by having Trump in office?

They get their opportunity in a few years to ride back in pretending they'll fix all the scary stuff he did to a very warm and weary nation, richer than ever because they're trading the same stock market grift, and they've now got extraconstitutional super powers and a new branch of the military entirely focused on domestic policing and super surveillance system that would make China blush if they even had the tech.

Hillary literally funded Trumps campaign early on with her "pied piper strategy" and then the DNC went on to fund all manner of fire brand GOP 'extreme' campaigns.

It FURTHERS their interests for these folks to win.
 
I also have to question, what do you think Brandon or Kamala LOSE by having Trump in office?
There is the impending inquiry about the Autopen issue. And then the investigation into the Russia Gate hoax. Watermelon head is getting investigated for fraud now as well. I’m uncertain if there are plans underway to look into Kamala’s shit. Might be, might not be.

Could it be possible that IF there was this damming client list, that it might have been deleted by the past administration or moved somewhere that we (US) cant look?

Do you think the FBI, given its tendency to fuck up pretty much everything actually did a decent job investigating the Epstein case and found this client list?

If Trump was indeed a member of this cabal or Epstein club, why was he given the B team to handle his security during the events that occurred last year in Pennsylvania?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emerson0311
And if any of that was true why didn’t Brandon and Kamala use it prior to the last election? Their AG had the same info as Bondi. Why wasn’t it used in the 2016 election?
The only answer is that they are all guilty.

You don’t throw stones if you live in a glass house.

It’s also important to note that AIPAC owns the majority of the elected officials on both sides of the aisle.
 
Last edited:
at least some of the democrats are demanding it now....
they didn't want to see them when biden was in charge, actively blocking their release...blackburn vs durbin....
but suddenly there is interest by some of them (notably not the most intelligent of the party).
it will be interesting if they will be allowed to continue, or if they will also be silenced.

ucV5NcfIjyRZ.jpeg



i am hoping this was just a ruse to get democrats to demand the release...
...preventing them from accusing trump and the doj of political attacks.
some are even suggesting the release will cause civil unrest unless both parties openly demand them together.

unfortunately this is more likely about protecting intelligence and law enforcement agencies that were actively involved.
The d leadership is playing games. It’s all theater. The poison pills in that bill they introduced easily proves this as true.
 
there is no way in hell if the dems had trump fucking kids on epstien island, they would not have burned him alive.


Stop being so gullible.
It’s much deeper than that. To them it’s about keeping the foreign influence/ops under wraps. It makes much more sense when you think about how the overwhelming majority of federal elected officials are bought and paid for by the same foreign entity. That’s why.

Also, Trump paid into the Clinton Foundation… wonder why he never went after them.
 
Last edited:
there is no way in hell if the dems had trump fucking kids on epstien island, they would not have burned him alive.


Stop being so gullible.
Nope.

Having pictures or movies of baby fucking politicians is like the superpowers having nukes. They all have them and if one gets launched everyone dies.
 
It’s much deeper than that. To them it’s about keeping the foreign influence/ops under wraps. It makes much more sense when you think about how the overwhelming majority of federal elected officials are bought and paid for by the same foreign entity. That’s why.

Also, Trump paid into the Clinton Foundation… wonder why he never went after them.
Go out side, put down the electronic device.

Sunshine, maybe some exercise
 
  • Like
Reactions: 232593
Go out side, put down the electronic device.

Sunshine, maybe some exercise
It appears that nearly all members of the 118th U.S. Congress (both the House and the Senate) received campaign contributions from pro‑Israel PACs during recent election cycles. A Guardian analysis found that in the early stages of the war in Gaza (through mid‑November 2023), of roughly 535 members of Congress, all but 33 received donationsfrom pro‑Israel groups—meaning about 502 members, or approximately 94%, had received such contributionsReddit+3The Guardian+3Israel Palestine News+3.

To break that down by chamber: the same analysis reported that 356 House members and 40 Senate members received pro‑Israel PAC funds during the 2023–2024 cycle Israel Palestine News+1WRMEA+1. Together, that's 396 members. However, the Guardian’s broader point includes donations in earlier cycles or outside strictly candidate donations, leading to the more comprehensive “all but 33” figure reflecting coverage of nearly the entire 535-member Congress .

Summary

  • ~94% of Congress (about 502 out of 535 members) have received donations from pro‑Israel PACs in recent years.
  • Specifically, in the 2023–2024 election cycle, 356 House members and 40 Senators were recipients of those donations teenvogue.com+15Israel Palestine News+15WRMEA+15.
 
Thought - if the 'files' included $T - why weren't the dumped when Biden was in office? If D's and Rhinos want them dumped now - what are the odds they have been manipulated to now include $T?

$T learned from the best on how create a dumpster fire and get people to watch

View attachment 8729500
This logic has been covered & debunked. You don’t throw stones in a glass house. It’s that simple.

The D leadership and the bill they put forward the other day was loaded with a poison pill that they knew the R’s would not vote for and pass. It’s all theatre as usual and both teams are guilty of this.
 
Last edited:

"Jeffrey Epstein was the pimp and the john. He was his own No. 1 client," Edwards told ABC News. "Nearly all of the exploitation and abuse of all of the women was intended to benefit only Jeffrey Epstein and Jeffrey Epstein's sexual desires."
Edwards describes the enigmatic Epstein as living, essentially, two separate lives: one in which he was sexually abusing women and girls "on a daily basis," and another in which he associated with politicians, royalty, and titans of business, academia, and science.
"For the most part, those two worlds did not overlap. And where they overlapped, in the instances they overlapped, it seems to be a very small percentage," Edwards said. "There were occasions where a select few of these men engaged in sexual acts with a select few of the girls that Jeffrey Epstein was exploiting or abusing -- primarily girls who were over the age of 18."

"That conduct was coercive, it was exploitative, and it was bad. But it's a small fraction of the men he was associated with," Edwards said. "And he was abusing hundreds of women, if not a thousand. And it's a very small fraction of those women that he was sending to men. That conduct was secondary to his abusive conduct. [Epstein] abused all of these women."
 
Absolutely. The whole thing didn’t revolve around exploited females. And it’s likely true the vast majority of Epstein acquaintances didn’t partake in that aspect (although they likely had knowledge of). It was more so a laundering pay to play op and the exploitation of females was secondary to that.

However, the guy knew thousands of people. What number is a small percentage? For example 5% of 1000 people is 50. Regardless, we need to know who that small percentage is. We also need to follow the $$ and find out what this shit was all about. So far everything points to Israel.

It should be concerning & alarming to Americans that a foreign government owns the vast majority of their elected officials.
 
Last edited:
Absolutely. The whole thing didn’t revolve around exploited females. And it’s likely true the vast majority of Epstein acquaintances didn’t partake in that aspect (although they likely had knowledge of). It was more so a laundering pay to play op and the exploitation of females was secondary to that.

However, the guy knew thousands of people. What number is a small percentage? For example 5% of 1000 people is 50. Regardless, we need to know who that small percentage is. We also need to follow the $$ and find out what this shit was all about. So far everything points to Israel.

It should be concerning & alarming to Americans that a foreign government owns the vast majority of their elected officials.
apparently pelosi is one of them.

 
lol. Grand jury testimony.. guess they combed though them and there wasn’t much so they are releasing.

It’s very obvious they are trying to fend off and appease the hordes. Maybe this likely useless information will work, then again maybe not.


How about releasing all the un redacted files and launching an investigation into the financing of the op.

Posted earlier:

IMG_1161.png
 
Last edited:
lol. Grand jury testimony.. guess they combed though them and there wasn’t much so they are releasing.


How about releasing all the un redacted files and launching an investigation into the financing of the op.
IMG_2511.png
IMG_2512.png
IMG_2513.png
IMG_2514.png
IMG_2515.png
IMG_2516.png
IMG_2517.png
IMG_2518.png
IMG_2519.png
IMG_2521.png
IMG_2522.png
IMG_2522.png
IMG_2524.png
IMG_2523.png
IMG_2520.png



I think someone’s a little fixated on this whole situation people like you are the ones that Trump’s talking about

fucking psychopath