We may finally know who’s been to the island

1. I don't think it's really complicated is Donald Trump by virtue of his own words someone who could reasonably be expected to have sexually assaulted women.

Well, he's admitted to doing it.

2. Is Donald Trump someone who could reasonably be expected to have assaulted minors?

Yeah, dude literally has dozens(in the range of 60+ I think) people who's kids were in the pageants circuit for teen girls he bought complaining he barges into the dressing rooms all the time to inspect the teen girls getting dressed. The models from his modelling agency dozens alleged he would barge in and touch them. Most of these allegations were around before he became a politician.

3. Is Donald Trump guilty of having a close financial relationship and spending a great deal of social time with the most prolific child rapist in history during the most extreme accusations of his crimes.

Yeah, in fact Donald Trump is in the massage booking logs on many occasions. Dershowitz has defended this however so there's that. The goalpoasts of "just because he visited the island doesn't many he did what EVERYONE else who visited the island did" is pretty slimy he didn't just VISIT the island.

4. Has Donald Trump shown surprising political favor for other people guilty of participating in or protecting Epstein from harm?

Yeah, Trumps associates run the full gamut of Epstein abusers and have done extremely well for themselves in his whitehouse. To this day even.

FFS Ghislaine admits to having recruited victims at Mar A Lago, and there's some serious questions about the Trump modeling agency that basically kept foreign immigrant teens in apartment buildings full of bunk beds and held their pay during their early modeling careers.

Not rocket science here. If you can't see the writing on the wall you've got emotional attachments.

Trump doesn't just look as guilty as Bill Clinton, Trump looks more like Epsteins partner than customer.
And if any of that was true why didn’t Brandon and Kamala use it prior to the last election? Their AG had the same info as Bondi. Why wasn’t it used in the 2016 election?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46 and theLBC
And if any of that was true why didn’t Brandon and Kamala use it prior to the last election? Their AG had the same info as Bondi. Why wasn’t it used in the 2016 election?



1752716567905.png


1752716746613.png


What kind of question is that?
 

None of that would have mattered to Brandon or Kamala. ESPECIALLY from 2021 through the end of 2022 when their party had complete control over all three branches of government. Why did they have to generate all those bullshit charges in NY to convict him if they had that Epstein list handy. Shit, if he was on the list why not blackmail him to stay out of the race altogether?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
Saw this on X so I googled it.

View attachment 8729243

This is what I got in the AI overview. Strange.
View attachment 8729244
Yeah the thing I will say is if this was the case, why sue? Right? Like why not go to criminal court?

The reason is this: suits require less evidence.

It like if I say you touched so and sos butthole, and you deny it, but then I ask one of my other friends to back me up as a “witness” that’s all it takes to win a lawsuit.

I say this not for Trump, but in ANY case that people try to say that a lawsuit is equal to a crime committed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 232593 and DuneBoer
Yeah the thing I will say is if this was the case, why sue? Right? Like why not go to criminal court?

The reason is this: suits require less evidence.

It If I say you touched so and sos butthole, and you deny it, but then I ask one of my other friends to back me up as a “witness” that’s all it takes to win a lawsuit.

I say this not for Trump, but in ANY case that people try to say that a lawsuit is equal to a crime committed.
Yeah the thing I will say is if this was the case, why sue? Right? Like why not go to criminal court?

The reason is this: suits require less evidence.

It If I say you touched so and sos butthole, and you deny it, but then I ask one of my other friends to back me up as a “witness” that’s all it takes to win a lawsuit.

I say this not for Trump, but in ANY case that people try to say that a lawsuit is equal to a crime committed.
Criminal cases must be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Civil case guilty by the preponderance of evidence.

Statute of limitations can play a part but for federal case of rape there is no SOL. NY state law is 20 years I think. Civil can cases go away with a big check.

I just thought it was weird what the google AI said.
 
And if any of that was true why didn’t Brandon and Kamala use it prior to the last election? Their AG had the same info as Bondi. Why wasn’t it used in the 2016 election?

Everyone trots this out as if the dems wouldn't gladly shield a pedophile to protect their donors just like Trump would shield a pedophile to protect his donors.

Note, they're largely the same donors.

The dems are just as opportunistic as anyone in the GOP they're all just wringing their hands watching and waiting for the right time to make a move and seize their own moments. None of what any of these people across any of these constituencies have any character Trump included.

Noone seems to assess character though everyone is so focused on the stream of unending horse shit these people are selling they completely ignore the character whenever it lines up with whatever story they've signed up for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: st1650
None of that would have mattered to Brandon or Kamala. ESPECIALLY from 2021 through the end of 2022 when their party had complete control over all three branches of government. Why did they have to generate all those bullshit charges in NY to convict him if they had that Epstein list handy. Shit, if he was on the list why not blackmail him to stay out of the race altogether?

I also have to question, what do you think Brandon or Kamala LOSE by having Trump in office?

They get their opportunity in a few years to ride back in pretending they'll fix all the scary stuff he did to a very warm and weary nation, richer than ever because they're trading the same stock market grift, and they've now got extraconstitutional super powers and a new branch of the military entirely focused on domestic policing and super surveillance system that would make China blush if they even had the tech.

Hillary literally funded Trumps campaign early on with her "pied piper strategy" and then the DNC went on to fund all manner of fire brand GOP 'extreme' campaigns.

It FURTHERS their interests for these folks to win.
 
I also have to question, what do you think Brandon or Kamala LOSE by having Trump in office?
There is the impending inquiry about the Autopen issue. And then the investigation into the Russia Gate hoax. Watermelon head is getting investigated for fraud now as well. I’m uncertain if there are plans underway to look into Kamala’s shit. Might be, might not be.

Could it be possible that IF there was this damming client list, that it might have been deleted by the past administration or moved somewhere that we (US) cant look?

Do you think the FBI, given its tendency to fuck up pretty much everything actually did a decent job investigating the Epstein case and found this client list?

If Trump was indeed a member of this cabal or Epstein club, why was he given the B team to handle his security during the events that occurred last year in Pennsylvania?
 
And if any of that was true why didn’t Brandon and Kamala use it prior to the last election? Their AG had the same info as Bondi. Why wasn’t it used in the 2016 election?
The only answer is that they are all guilty.

You don’t throw stones if you live in a glass house.

It’s also important to note that AIPAC owns the majority of the elected officials on both sides of the aisle.
 
Last edited:
at least some of the democrats are demanding it now....
they didn't want to see them when biden was in charge, actively blocking their release...blackburn vs durbin....
but suddenly there is interest by some of them (notably not the most intelligent of the party).
it will be interesting if they will be allowed to continue, or if they will also be silenced.

ucV5NcfIjyRZ.jpeg



i am hoping this was just a ruse to get democrats to demand the release...
...preventing them from accusing trump and the doj of political attacks.
some are even suggesting the release will cause civil unrest unless both parties openly demand them together.

unfortunately this is more likely about protecting intelligence and law enforcement agencies that were actively involved.
The d leadership is playing games. It’s all theater. The poison pills in that bill they introduced easily proves this as true.