• The Shot You’ll Never Forget Giveaway - Enter To Win A Barrel From Rifle Barrel Blanks!

    Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Search results

  1. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    No you did it again, you didn’t address it. In your first response you said the ancient of days was Jesus, now you are saying the son of man is Jesus. However, in Daniel the son of man and the ancient of days are two separate people. It is clearer than day in Daniel these two are distinct...
  2. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    Er wrong, there are two people there Ancient of Days and Son of man. Both are portrayed as God. You didn’t address the two people The ancient of days is the Father The son of man is the Son (that’s why Jesus calls himself that) They are described here as separate persons yet both God Then fast...
  3. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    Again posting more scripture taken out of context is not answering the questions But back to Dan7:9-13 Who is the Son of Man? Who is the Ancient of Days? If they are the same person, why would the author very clearly differentiate the two as individual people in the text? Since the text...
  4. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    YOU DID IT AGAIN YOU DIDNT ADDRESS WHAT WAS SAID! YOU DIDNT ADDRESS DANIEL! ADDRESS THE QUESTIONS ABOUT DANIEL! You don’t because you know your view of scripture cannot sustain it, so you ignore and deflect. Further your statement “Plz use Scripture If you are able... Not interested in the...
  5. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    Additionally you completely miss the Trinitarian language in John 1. “The Word was with God, and the Word was God”. Do you not see it? If it is just referring to one person, why would it say the word was with God? No one says they were WITH themselves, they say they are BY themselves. We only...
  6. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    He didn’t even try to do that, he just ignored it
  7. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    Daniel 7:9-14 is WHAT THE BIBLE SAYS! You just did it again, you answered NONE of my questions and did not address ANY of Daniel 7:9-14. It is the whole counsel of God, not the counsel of a few cherry picked verses and ignoring anything else. You ask for proof, proof is given, then ignored...
  8. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    It’s interesting that they say something like that is symbolism, yet will say the prophetic vision in Revelation is literal.(sorry CPTNK not Revelations like you said before).
  9. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    There you go again, not actually addressing anything that is said to you and dismissing it outright. Just because you say something is nonsense does not make it so. But that is a standard debate topic of people whose arguments have no grounding. The questions you keep asking, with how their...
  10. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    You Continue to ignore and sidestep the claims that are made in scripture and what I said above. Just restating your view over mine is not interacting with what was said, does not refute what was said, and in no way address what was said. In order to do that, you must say why what I said was...
  11. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    First yea names are import and you fail to realize that your assessment of names and how they relate in the NT and OT is flawed. You did not address one thing that was said above regarding that. Incorrect the Spirit is a different person from the Father but the same God, read my post above and...
  12. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    Further let’s address your claims about the Spirit being the Father or his force. First of all, the Holy Spirit is a person, not a force. Not power. John 15:26–27says, “When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, that is the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He...
  13. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    First the discussion of the name is very important. People like to appeal to names for their argument. You yourself did this saying Jesus is the revealed name of God that was somehow kept secret as you mentioned Judges (again the Hebrew word there is not secret as the KJV says, the Hebrew word...
  14. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    You need to go back and read what was previously posted. Your statement about personhood shows that you do not understand the trinity. There is one divine nature/substance of God, in three co-equal, co-eternal persons: God the Father, God the Son (Jesus Christ), and God the Holy Spirit. These...
  15. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    You do know Jesus in Hebrew is actually Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ) or sometimes Yehoshua (יְהוֹשֻׁעַ) which literally means YHWH is salvation. So sorry Jesus isn’t somehow the revealed name of God.
  16. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    Thank you for your truth and candor. What I will say is that you need to stop trying to read especially the OT as a modern and read it in its ancient context. Often we think there is contradiction because we do not know the original languages and do not understand the literary genre of biblical...
  17. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    In addition to God’s name being YHWH, the KJV version you used renders that word secret incorrectly . פִּלְאִי The Hebrew word is actually rendered wonderful, incomprehensible, extraordinary.
  18. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    Hmm interesting that someone would make a theological claim that is not anywhere in scripture and call it a perspective, yet aggressively deny the trinity which is a theological term that came about to convey the truths we see in scripture. You are not being theologically consistent
  19. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    Sorry but this is wrong and it can be shown easily. The one true God is named in the OT and his name is YHWH. The angle of the LORD is actually the angle of YHWH (we render it as LORD in English)
  20. C

    Pope Death Watch... WITH A PRIZE!!! Quart of Maple Syrup to the winner!

    And where are you getting this from? I do not see this anywhere in scripture