Search results
-
.308 Winchester VS 7.62X51mm NATO
Re: .308 Winchester VS 7.62X51mm NATO I think where the "myth" lies is the different methods (Copper Crusher/Electronic Transducer/etc.), units (CUP/PSI/BAR/etc.), what (MAP/Peak/Working/etc.) and locations of the sensors (mid-chamber/shoulder/etc.) in reading the pressure during testing...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #13
- Forum: Bolt Action Rifles
-
Suppressors Springfield Loaded need new grips...
Re: Springfield Loaded need new grips... Pachmayr "Colt 1911 Combat", the plain, flat version with the mainspring housing pin cut-out but <span style="font-weight: bold">without</span> the swells and frontstrap extension over the magazine lip of some models. Has worked for me for 30+ years...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #15
- Forum: The Armory
-
Rifle Scopes LNIB?
Re: LNIB? Absolutely Hydro... When it comes to guns, the standard across the board is; LNIB means the same condition as when it left the factory, with accompanying box, literature and accessories. Previously sold at retail, but new in every other respect. Why would it mean anything...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #21
- Forum: Observation & Sighting Devices
-
Suppressors Single Action Sixgun - What ya'lls got?
Re: Single Action Sixgun - What ya'lls got? My S/As are just for fun, no heavy loads, just SASS power LFN and a few Winchester Silvertips just to see how they handled. I've got a matched pair of 4 3/4" Nickel (for blackpower clean-up) AWA "Peacekeeper", Model P clones in .45 Colt. AWA built...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #10
- Forum: The Armory
-
Fieldcraft Recoil off bipod
Re: Recoil off bipod <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JRose</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Can't quit looking.... </div></div> Now that is freekin' funny... Note to thread; Please DIE now.....- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #259
- Forum: Sniper’s Hide Fieldcraft
-
Rifle Scopes Why Mils over IPHY?
Re: Why Mils over IPHY? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: NineHotel</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: sub2.908cm/100m</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> BTW, you might wish to do...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #90
- Forum: Observation & Sighting Devices
-
-
Rifle Scopes Why Mils over IPHY?
Re: Why Mils over IPHY? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: NineHotel</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And sub2, if you research both the metric system and the mil-radian system you will see that the were invented hundreds of years apart and one is not...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #67
- Forum: Observation & Sighting Devices
-
Rifle Scopes Why Mils over IPHY?
Re: Why Mils over IPHY? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rafael</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Yes sir, though I certainly did not invent it. I would argue that all measurement systems were invented, and then someone else reinvented them, and again...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #55
- Forum: Observation & Sighting Devices
-
Rifle Scopes Why Mils over IPHY?
Re: Why Mils over IPHY? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lindy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">An inch is certainly a unit of linear measurement. So is a centimeter - but one-tenth of a milliradian is an angle which subtends an arc whose length is...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #50
- Forum: Observation & Sighting Devices
-
Suppressors Why 9mm?
Re: Why 9mm? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: marduk185</div><div class="ubbcode-body">why did we switch from m14 to m16? </div></div> See the lure in the water, just don't feel like biting. If we'd adopted the original FAL in 7.92x33 or .280 for...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #80
- Forum: The Armory
-
Suppressors Why 9mm?
Re: Why 9mm? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Downzero</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ArcticLight</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #78
- Forum: The Armory
-
Suppressors Why 9mm?
Re: Why 9mm? <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ArcticLight</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: joe90</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So I was wondering why the military has been...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #77
- Forum: The Armory
-
Suppressors Why 9mm?
Re: Why 9mm? To answer the original question… We jammed the 7.62x51 down our NATO allies’ throats in the ‘50s and had just, almost 30 years later, convinced them to adopt the 5.56x45 as a secondary standard rifle round so I guess we finally had to put up or shut up about STANAG and adopt the...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #54
- Forum: The Armory
-
Suppressors glock 34
Re: glock 34 Another BladeTech fan here, but I'd suggest getting the correct G34/35 version rather than making due with the G17/22/31 or G19/23/32 versions. The pistol will stay put alot better in the correct holster. Take that as a "no sh*t for sure" too, flying Glocks are not a pretty...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #7
- Forum: The Armory
-
Suppressors Kahr pm9 What do you think
Re: Kahr pm9 What do you think I can only speak for my pistols, but… My PM9 has been absolutely reliable with everything I’ve fed it. Carry loads are; Win 127+P+ or GD 124+P. Using the +P+, it's a little snappy, with its relatively short grip, but that's what makes it appealing as a hide-out...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #19
- Forum: The Armory
-
Suppressors Not your usual "which 9mm do i buy".
Re: Not your usual "which 9mm do i buy". G19, on the outside chance concealment might some day become a possibility, who knows maybe pigs will fly one day, or... G17, cause they are so "generic" and everyone should own one, but... Especially a G34 for the greater sight radius, reduced...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #22
- Forum: The Armory
-
Rifle Scopes Russian scope ID
Re: Russian scope ID <div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VSP968</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It's a PblCb. Tantal used to sell them. The BDC reticle is for 7.62X39. I'll look and see if I can find the manual..... Edited to add: I found the manual...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #10
- Forum: Observation & Sighting Devices
-
Rifle Scopes Russian scope ID
Re: Russian scope ID Fair enough... Smart ass out...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #8
- Forum: Observation & Sighting Devices
-
Rifle Scopes Russian scope ID
Re: Russian scope ID Lighten-up Francis... Notice the ? It's called a joke, as in... Ever notice how the English translations for the Russian scope designations seem to be PU, PO, <span style="font-weight: bold">POS</span>/P? FWIW, yours appears to be an older PSO that some call...- sub2.908cm/100m
- Post #6
- Forum: Observation & Sighting Devices
