Attaching a brake is the same concept as a tuner. It’s a weight on the muzzle. This will possibly change group size which requires seating depth testing/adjustments. As long as nothing is wrong with the brake, it will eventually tighten back up once you get the right seating depth.
Powder...
Yea, it’s all about realistic expectations. I’m within .002 variance on trimmed cases with Henderson trimmer (verified via caliper). And I see up to .004 or so difference in the start point on the graph if I zoom in.
I’m *assuming* that’s due to length of chamfer and bullet variation. I have...
If you’re not using the expander ball and you have dented necks, then yes, you’ll need mandrel them first.
If it’s a small dent, can get away with sizing and then mandrel. If it’s substantial, you’ll want to uniform the neck first.
Seated deeper = less capacity = more pressure.However, it’s not usually substantial.
Seating into the lands can be a substantial increase in pressure depending.
Initial spikes are *likely* due to chamfer aggressiveness (or lack of chamfer).
Have to really visualize what’s going on with bullet and neck during the graph.
Bullet has to overcome the initial resistance of the top of neck.
After, as the bullet is progressing in the neck, it has less and...
If you have the right mindset, it’s a good tool.
If you’re the type who will get paralyzed when something doesn’t “look” like you expected, just send AMP $1400 and tell them to keep the press. It’s cheaper.
I’m seeing a lot of things that validate what I though prior. I’m also seeing things...
So, just messing around, I did 10 each:
Lapua 6br virgin - mandrel/chamfer
Hornady 6gt virgin - mandrel/chamfer
Hornady 6gt virgin - IDOD neck turned to .009 wall/sized down/mandrel/chamfer
All three had a Peak Force ES of 10/11. The Hornady non turned was 49-60lbs. The turned Hornady and...
This press is for masochists……
Definitely will show you how consistent or not things are. This is fired hornady 6gt, not cleaned, not annealed, not neck turned. This is “acceptable” IMO. But I’d like to see better.
Regardless of what will show on paper, this is already an excellent example of how much more feedback this provides than say a hydro press.
All 5 of the first rounds hade a very consistent Peak Force which is what most pay attention to. But as you can see, there was quite a bit of variation.
Here’s interesting graph from ultimate reloader. Top 5 lines are virgin lapua 6.5 cm with expander ball run in them.
Bottom 5 (stacked on each other) are same, but having been run through AMP annealer.
Seems to *suggest* what lapua considers acceptable annealing isn’t as consistent as the AMP...
I’m sure they designed it for long term use.
I’ll be using mine for several hundred rounds a week on average. It has an auto mode. So you just slide the die in, the load cell senses it, then auto seats and makes a trace.
Once I decide how I’ll be batching ammo (based on testing) my process...