Bryan,
Do the requested "Range 2" and "Range 3" distances look right to you for the ballistic calibration feature? They look far out to me for a .308 175 SMK. Thanks.
Hi Bryan,
Thank you for your response. It is certainly possible that I missed some features. If so, I do apologize and I will retract my above statements.
With regard to features, I would like a lot more data output. As much data as possible. For instance, markers for supersonic...
I will preface this by saying that Applied Ballistics and Litz are of tremendous value to the industry. However, the app is a lot plainer than I expected. Frankly, for $30 I was expecting a ton more features. It does the same as cheaper apps and less than another app at the same price. Also, all...
My mistake. I was picking the G1 profile instead of the "Litz" version.
Does the app capture environmental factors like weather and direction of fire or does all that have to be inputted manually?
I may have identified a problem. I picked 175 SMK from the bullet library and it says it's using G7, but I only see G1 numbers displayed below it. I'm new to AP so I might be missing something.
I've been looking forward to picking up a couple of your AICS mag pouches, but other expenses keep getting in the way. After reading this, I understand that the price justified. I will make it happen when I can spare the cash.
I have a notched 6-9 Harris from Larue with the Larue QD mount. It is in excellent condition, as it has seen very little use. I would gladly trade with anyone here for a second Atlas with QD in similar condition.
That would be my preference, but it doesn't appear I will have an opportunity to check zero.
For perspective, however, I'm shooting steel while people carefully peer through spotting scopes. I'm not going to war. Still, I would hate to be missing because of it.
I think I'll exercise a little...
I re-torqued my rings since my last time out and I have competition this Saturday. Should I be concerned about a shift in my zero? The screws seemed like they were already torqued down pretty well, but chances are they moved slightly.
That was precisely my concern. It seems to me that using angled shot DOPE might be inherently flawed for the purpose of truing common ballistic software. Thank you for the information.
My concern is that none of my ballistic calculators seem to factor in other data for calibration. The only thing they seem to require is range and elevation. That's why I'm wondering how to use the from the angled shot, if at all.
I have a long range competition coming up this weekend. My primary goal is to collect dope on my new handloads for the purpose of truing my Kestrel w/ AB and some other iPhone ballistic calculators I use. However, it occurred to me that while there will be quite a few targets at varying ranges...