Search results

Search the forum Search Articles
  1. lash

    🚨 NFA language BACK IN!!! (Post #121) HPA/Short Act Update 7/1 ☎️ these 💩 and yell at them more

    Well, if you use Silencer Central, they will pay the $200 fee for you now.
  2. lash

    No Fee for Surppressors or short barrell rifles

    Wikipedia for one: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm The gov for another : https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=definition+of+terrorism&f=treesort&num=161
  3. lash

    No Fee for Surppressors or short barrell rifles

    Yes. Plus, the language says more than 90 days after the law is enacted.
  4. lash

    No Fee for Surppressors or short barrell rifles

    The media always runs with the first thing that they hear or that fits their agenda. Real news is rarely reported correctly. What’s most important is reporting first! Breaking News! Sad, but true.
  5. lash

    No Fee for Surppressors or short barrell rifles

    The Byrd Rule kept the removal of them from NFA from making it through the Senate.
  6. lash

    No Fee for Surppressors or short barrell rifles

    Here’s the actual language in the bill: (thanks @doubloon ) The only thing that’s changed is the amount of the tax. From $200 to $0 in January.
  7. lash

    No Fee for Surppressors or short barrell rifles

    The news has it wrong.
  8. lash

    No Fee for Surppressors or short barrell rifles

    It is not treated like all other firearms sales and will not be under this change. Where did you get that impression? See what I posted above. That’s the reality, or would be in January 2026 when this takes effect. Edit: I see that you saw it on Fox. They are wrong.
  9. lash

    No Fee for Surppressors or short barrell rifles

    Nothing has changed with the passage of the bill except for the amount of the tax. It was/is $200 per item, but is now $0. ALL other requirements for Suppressors and SBRs remain the same. You still have to file a Form 4 with fingerprints and etc like before. That’s it. No other change.
  10. lash

    House Budget Proposal to remove Tax on Suppressors but not remove it from the NFA

    That’s it in a nutshell.
  11. lash

    She knew she would be famous, 19 year old girl is now dead.

    Ooh, ooh, Mr Carter! How about with a SIG?
  12. lash

    Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

  13. lash

    She knew she would be famous, 19 year old girl is now dead.

  14. lash

    🚨 NFA language BACK IN!!! (Post #121) HPA/Short Act Update 7/1 ☎️ these 💩 and yell at them more

    That was always a possibility when the tax was $200.
  15. lash

    House Budget Proposal to remove Tax on Suppressors but not remove it from the NFA

    Fair enough. I see the exemption for GCA and NFA registered manufacturers. All others pay a tax…at this time.
  16. lash

    House Budget Proposal to remove Tax on Suppressors but not remove it from the NFA

    They pay $100 for a manufactures tax. Not $200.
  17. lash

    She knew she would be famous, 19 year old girl is now dead.

  18. lash

    🚨 NFA language BACK IN!!! (Post #121) HPA/Short Act Update 7/1 ☎️ these 💩 and yell at them more

    Read my post above and click on the link.
  19. lash

    Tikka T3 Thread

    Incorrect. We attempted to point out that you were unnecessarily being a dick. But apparently you don’t learn. Well, apparently you want to argue more than I do. So enjoy your non answers.
  20. lash

    🚨 NFA language BACK IN!!! (Post #121) HPA/Short Act Update 7/1 ☎️ these 💩 and yell at them more

    No tax on SBRs and Suppressors is still in it. https://www.snipershide.com/shooting/threads/house-budget-proposal-to-remove-tax-on-suppressors-but-not-remove-it-from-the-nfa.7257345/post-12221514 Not saying we didn’t get fucked, but maybe they used Vaseline.
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts