Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Contest Starting Now! This Target Haunts Me
Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!
The statement would still be false. Out of all the countries involved in WWII (and that would be almost every single one on earth) only 13 types of self loading rifles were used during the conflict to any degree, and most only in the waning days. This obviously doesn’t include SMG or LMG’s, but...
I’m actually a big fan of the Swiss chargers. Yes, like the Mosin, they’re a bit slower than Mauser’s or Enfield’s that kick the stripper clip/charger out of the action when the bolt is closed, but the Swiss charger design reliably feeds the rounds into the magazine with little issue. Personally...
Well the question was battle rifle... My implication is that we’re talking about bolt guns specifically made for mass military issue from the 1800’s to the immediate post-WWII period. Not sniper variations and not rifles converted from the original form.
Rereading your original post I think I mistook you... I interpreted your “most influential” comment to mean its lasting influence on hunting rifles as essentially the only action to survive the transition to self-loading arms. I apologize.
Again that’s not the question... Nobody can argue that Mauser’s design isn’t the most influential. As the strongest bolt action design it should be as hunting applications in which the safety of the shooter easily trump the need for speed and reliability in harsh conditions, and when you...
So not really sniper related but certainly vintage...
I’m in the field right now and me and a couple of my guys had this debate last night and I thought I’d see what answers I got here...
What would you argue is the greatest standard issue bolt action battle rifle in history and why? Not...
Here's a bit of an odd question I guess... I'm not quite sure where to ask it so I figure this is as good a place as any.
I'm attempting to use ballistic calculations to get a zero for a couple milsurp rifles I have using a 25yd range. I know with scopes you adjust your calculations off the...
Picked up a trigger pull gauge... The trigger pull on the Mosin varies between 5.5lbs and just over 7lbs over 6 pulls. Very inconsistent, but still better than my M48 which didn’t break until the scale bottomed out.
I won’t shoot surplus. I’ll handload for it as I do for all my guns minus my AK and 9mm. Once I get it out to find out how it shoots I’ll look into shimming it for better accuracy if need be. I’d like to have one essentially stock and another to set up as a reproduction sniper if I can find one...
So I finally broke down and picked up a Mosin Nagant... it’s a 1945 Tula build, so I’m guessing it was one of the last to be produced in the Soviet Union and probably saw little if any action during the war. I’ve never really liked the Mosin Nagant, but being a history nerd I wanted at least one...
Not necessarily... Leatherwood makes some very good repro scopes. I don’t have first hand experience with their USMC 8x reproduction scopes, but i can say that their M73 and M82 2.5x scopes are better than the originals.
It has to do with collectability and how few there are in the country. I've heard there may be as few as 100 rifles total rifles, both Russian and Chinese made, in the country. And most of those are civilian Tiger models.