Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Contest Starting Now! This Target Haunts Me
Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!
The rear bag was in regards to help with a more comfortable body position in the prone position. I clearly stated that because you stated a concern with neck strain in the prone position if I'm not mistaken.
Ehh I'm 5'8" so I run a LOP that is a happy medium for prone and positional shooting. I do believe you are better off with a shorter LOP than a LOP that is too long. Typically if I run a LOP that is perfect for me in the prone position that LOP is slightly too long for positional. I find myself...
For the prone position i know exactly what you are talking about. Running a taller rear bag helps tremendously and getting up for on your forearms and elbows. The prone position is used as an example I should have ran my bipod legs way higher, my body position was way too flat for the elevated...
It took alot of convincing from @drglock for me to lower my cheek piece and stop smashing my face down. In turn it allowed me to get the stock more inside on the clavicle and see that my recoil impulse was straight back and my face wasn't pushing the stock down or in a down and to side motion...
When I was new to precision rifles and PRS I did this crap thinking it was the right way. Cheek piece cranked up and smashing my face down. My recoil management and my POI was very inconsistent. Lost target in the scope on the regular and missed shots high on the regular. Soon as I lowered my...
Less down pressure from head to cheek piece is better. More down pressure needs to have equal pressure up from rear bag support. Why you see the PRS crowd do more of a jaw weld with light pressure and influencing the rifle system little as possible. (taking out as much human error as possible)
I'm pretty sure Keith Baker has been running pretty tall rings for awhile. I know in one podcast he talked about experimenting with even taller rings than 1.5" height. I know I currently run 1.125 height and honestly wish I had bought taller for the comfort when going prone. Shorter rings...
Absolutely, I started off with a 14lb 6.5. I made work with what I had at the time. Before I got into PRS I wanted a do all rifle so I built a 22in 6.5 in a prs1 stock. It shot the 130s really good. Ran them at 2875 with RL16 until both become unicorn dust and seeds.
The guy that stuffed 115s in the ARC had to have a longer freebore so I would imagine yes his OAL was longer. If I remember correctly he loaded mag length on a BR or dasher mag.
I personally have not but a few friends have. It's a great bullet. Only downside was that they typically sold out very fast when George had them in stock. But I believe i heard hornady will be putting the 109 on shelves to it's dealers. I could be wrong on that. I may be thinking of their 109...
Tha small group of friends i compete with alot of us shot the 115 dtac in GT or arc. One guy was successful pushing his arc to 2800 with n540 but man is was a hot load definitely was trashing starline brass. One thing we noticed with the arc and 108s is that it lost its ass past 700 for whatever...
Because somehow I skipped over that information he posted earlier and I did not triple read every post. So my apologies for not reading every post. I mean he/she was playing middle man between hornady tech and here on the hide sooo is he/she not tech support? Are we supposed to take that word to...