Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Contest Starting Now! This Target Haunts Me
Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!
Very cool; the Seekins set is one that I considered (also considered the M4E1 and BCM MK2). I'm very curious to see your results. I can't wait to compare my MUR/URX/Bartlein combo vs your Seekins/Lilja combo. Not trying to make a competition out of it, just genuinely curious if there ends up...
I asked this question (same question as the OP) a couple months ago on 2 other forums and didn't really receive any first hand info, just a few opinions on what might be best.
I eventually decided on a Noveske marked MUR upper (because it has a little more material around the barrel extension...
Can’t call from work unfortunately, but iirc from looking at your website you don’t carry Bushnell’s DMR ii Pro correct?
Either way thanks for the sale and service to the members of this site
I’m not sure how short “short” is for you but these came to mind:
NF SHV F1 4-14x50
Bushnell LRTSi 4.5-18
Bushnell DMR II 3.5-21
Eotech Vudu 3.5-18/5-25
Sig Tango 6 3-18/4-24
Also there is a thread there about the upcoming Burris XTR III 3.3-18x50 that you might find interesting.
I haven’t played with the Gen 2 PST. I owned a gen 1 pst 6-24x50 ffp and now own a Razor Gen 2 4.5-27. The Razor is a much better scope optically. One thing I hated about the PST was how blurry it started to get in the 18-20x range. The Razor presents a much cleaner image throughout the mag...
The Tango 6 line is more closely comparable to the Vortex Razor line as opposed to the PST line. If price is approximately the same I would go with the Sig.
None of what you’ve said applies, either to what I stated nor to what the OP has asked for (banging steel out to 450 yards).
On 1x - use as red dot. Zero difference in speed/precision compared to FFP option.
On 6x - operates exactly the same as an FFP scope because the subtentions are correct...
Ignorant post is ignorant. FFP vs SFP does not matter in lpvo. FFP is fine, we all know the benefits.
Here’s why an SFP lpvo is not a hinderance: you use it (in the case of my Razor) at either 1x or 6x. At 1x the subtensions don’t matter cause you’re using it between 0 and 200 yards and...
I think the few thousandths of a second in the barrel and anything you might be doing within that .003 of a second are less likely to be the cause of the difference in accuracy and your barrel simply preferring that load more likely to be the cause of the difference in accuracy.
My BCM 16" ELW...
I'd love to hear more reports from owners of this particular scope - it is currently at the top of my list for the ar10 build I'm planning next year. Unfortunately there are few user reports on this particular optic - I know it is new as of this year but I hoped it would be in more hands given...
Just shot some yesterday out to 600 yards. Only shot one group at 100 yards and it measured ~ 1.5” from my BCM 16” elw with a 1-6x scope and a less than ideal rest (range bag under handguard, no rear bag). This barrel shoots the same with IMI and doesn’t shoot much better with fgmm, shoots...
You should be able to find a new Gen 1 razor (5-20) for less than $1700. In fact you can get a new or slightly used gen 2 razor (4.5-27) for ~$1800-$1900 either here on the PX or from a Hide vendor.
No experience with NF but I own a few vortex products including Razors and have nothing but...