Search results

  1. D

    Rifle Scopes Atacr 7-35 reticle choices for prs

    Comme on...The whole story about Mil-C reticle thickness is a few different answers received directly from NF. They told me 0.033mils, but they have 7-35 AD on their website with 0.04mils. Or do you believe of all specs they advertised on their site?
  2. D

    Night Vision What in the heck is this scopes model?

    This is NOT Czech republic army NV device. As you can see, it is ZRAK made scope, so it is Bosnia and Herzegovina located company.
  3. D

    Rifle Scopes ATACR 4-16 Mil R or Mil C Reticle

    numbering mils is a good idea for me, because of speed on target / prevention of mistakes - wrong count. I agree with first mil is not necessary to mark. I wish the Hensoldt put some numbers to their NH-1 reticle. to each his own...
  4. D

    Rifle Scopes Atacr 7-35 reticle choices for prs

    I have got their reply at December 2019. Before that I have been compared these two scopes and could not find any diference in main lines thickness from my short observation at shop. Mine scope with Mil-C is S/N AA58xxxA range. I have a NF print of Atacr 5-25 Mil-C reticle subtensions from...
  5. D

    Rifle Scopes Atacr 7-35 reticle choices for prs

    main lines at Mil-C are the same as Mil-XT, both 0.033mils in thickness, info from NF.
  6. D

    Rifle Scopes Nightforce NX8 Reticle Pics

    I have seen some NX8 scopes with MIL-C reticle which have more hash marks for windage/moving target correction compared to MIL-C in 5-25 and 7-35 F1 Atacrs. It looks they "updated" this reticle for more horizontal holds (+5mils with 0.2 hash marks at each side).
  7. D

    Rifle Scopes Why isn’t Meopta Included among the Best?

    to Weatherbee do you think we should buy each scope we are talking about here on SH ? Personally, I am very happy and much appreciate that other guys made me a favour and gave me advice how to not trash my money as they already did with Meopta scopes.
  8. D

    Rifle Scopes Why isn’t Meopta Included among the Best?

    they used the same click values with mil based reticles, do you understand ? It is not MOA and not MIL, but something odd. Value of 1/4MOA is 7.275mm at 100m, not 7mm they use in their scopes. Meopta 6-24x56 RD
  9. D

    Rifle Scopes Why isn’t Meopta Included among the Best?

    why the hell should I trash my money for a scope brand that all of my frineds warned me off ?!? Tell me, how you can use mil reticle with 0.7cm/100m ( aprox. 1/4MOA) turret cliks. This value is laser etched on turrets and not my fantasy ! Post here any photo of competition shooter or LE/Military...
  10. D

    Rifle Scopes Why isn’t Meopta Included among the Best?

    dude, I have been playing with some of their stuff, but never ever I am going to buy them for my rifles ! Their glass is very good without a doubt, but turrets / clicks are no-go. Do you know that they made turrets with stupid click range like 0.7mm/100m (aprox. 1/4MOA) but with mil sized...
  11. D

    Rifle Scopes Why isn’t Meopta Included among the Best?

    well, it is your money and your rifle. Come back after year of usage with dialing turrets and report how it tracks / holds POI - zero.
  12. D

    Rifle Scopes Why isn’t Meopta Included among the Best?

    save your money and buy proven optics like NF, SB, Kahles, Leupold, TT, Minox... Meopta scopes are good for hunting, but not for tactical, sport, LR etc. purposes. Many shooters complain about reliability issues with tracking / holding zero, turrets...repeatedly going for service / warranty...
  13. D

    Rifle Scopes NightForce NX8 4-32x50 - Quick (dumb) Question

    do not be lazy and try the google search function first ! NX8 unboxing
  14. D

    Rifle Scopes Spuhr vs, ARC

    great video which may explain why some shooters have an issue with parallax adj., ring marks on scope tube etc. I am not talking that all these problems go from rings, but definitely a lot of them. Keep in mind that even very small missalignment (which you can not see with eyes) between rings or...
  15. D

    Rifle Scopes Spuhr vs, ARC

    yes, mounting height with SPUHR is obviously cons due to central mass of material which holds mount one piece. But you will never reach optical axis precision with separate rings. There always will be small drift / off axis placement with rings witch put some stress to the scope tube. This is...
  16. D

    Rifle Scopes Schmidt & Bender 5-25 or the 3-20

    I have had a chance to play with new "updated version" of SB 3-20x50 (not US version) which has now billet mag ring instead of rubber one. I have noticed that turrets lost some crisp feel on clicks. Definitely different feel beside "old" rubberized version we still have on work rifles. I do not...
  17. D

    Rifle Scopes Nightforce ATACR 5-25x56 F1 & ATACR 7-35x56 F1 Comparison

    7-35 F1 with Mil-C reticle has 0.033mrad main lines. For me, it is perfect. Not too thin or thick, imho very well balanced.
  18. D

    Rifle Scopes Kahles K525i 5-25x56 and Nightforce 5-25 x 56 F1 Comparison

    could you please explain what exactly was wrong with them? If it was an operators error or you got 2 lemons...?