Search results

Need a mil reticle in the 2-10....

Maybe it's a me problem, but why would someone even want 10 mils of windage on the horizontal stadia in a 2-12? Do people normally shoot in 50 MPH crosswinds? I'd much rather see the thick stadia come down to 5 mil.

Yeah, I've run into the PA secret info response as well. There are so many ways to figure out the sub tensions of anyone cares... PA is just pissing off potential customers. And FFS they're making this shit in China. Do they really think their info is safe with a Chinese factory? It's not...

Just looking at the photo, doesn't appear to be the same material. I've used the Manta for high round counts. It's significantly better than any of the fabric wrapped covers I've used (BPG, Rifles only, Armageddon)

For that type of use id highly recommend Manta Defense: https://mantadefense.com/product-category/suppressor-covers/ I have their V2. Compared to the Rifles Only HAD the Manta is much more secure and blocks much more heat. Biggest disadvantage is the cover isn't easy on and off. You have to...

Another data point: BRT 12.5 nitride barrel IMI 77 - 2560 FPS avg

I don't know, I sure like the look of my 2.5-10 x32 NXS on an AR.

According to PA that is top secret proprietary info that you have no need to know.

I'd add the Atacr 1-8 to the list of reticles.

Since this was bumped... Ran another RNG with the PLX-C. Chevron still sucks for anything other than generous targets. It's kind of like the XS Big Dot of scope reticles.

Ribbed for your pleasure

For heavy semi auto use I've been happy with Manta Defense: https://mantadefense.com/product/manta-v2-suppressor-cover/ It's much more secure than my Rifles Only HAD and also a much better insulator.

It would have a Firedot MOA wind plex reticle with a CDS turret.

Is yours FFP or SFP? If FFP what do you think of the reticle at 2.5x?

6x6 plate, 250 yards. 10mph wind. Which reticles allow you make a precise hold, or see splash and make a correction?

A 12x20 target at 300 yards isn't exactly a ringing endorsement. Literally any optic will let you do that. A basic 1-4 with a duplex is fine out to 300 yards on a target that big. Hell, red dots are fine for that. The whole purpose of a modern FFP 1-8 is to expand the capability of the...

I would be really curious to know the sales numbers of the Nova reticles compared to their normal chevrons. I do kind of wish the Nova PLX-C was a 1-6 instead of 8x. It gets pretty tight and dark when you get over 7x. I'd rather have the usable mil stadia at 6x with better IQ and FOV

Does anyone have experience with the non illuminated TMR in FFP? It looks like it could be useable at 2.5x... hard to judge based on just the spec sheet.

I'd be happy with a simple mil dot reticle honestly. If we're really getting crazy maybe half mil lines. Hell of a lot more useful than a BDC or standard duplex.