• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Search results

  1. S

    Good source for Hornady TAP A-MAX 168gr?

    Bump, no 168 gr in stock anywhere?
  2. S

    Good source for Hornady TAP A-MAX 168gr?

    Thanks Mile High has 155 gr in stock and is expecting 168 in a couple weeks! 168 gr anywhere now?
  3. S

    Good source for Hornady TAP A-MAX 168gr?

    I can't ever seem to find enough of this. Looking for conplete rounds, not just bullets for reloading. I've got it for around $27 per box recently. Hoping to find someone who has regular stock for <$30/box. Thanks much.
  4. S

    How to block a folding stock on Scar 16s\17S ?

    This Easy, cheap & clean CA legal SCAR mod is the cleanest and nicest approach to this I have found. It is like the "bullet button" of folding stocks. I started down the road of designing my own system and bringing it to the market. Then I got busy with two little ones... Unfortunately, you need...
  5. S

    Most likely source of discrepancy between ballistics app and actual shots (.308 @ 600 yds)

    Yeah, yeah, don't rub it in. I'm still working on consistency at 100 yards. I shoot my semi-auto (SCAR 17) much more consistently generally around 1 MOA at 100 yards. That rifle seems quite capable of out-shooting me, but unfortunately the Remington 700 perhaps doesn't, even just at 100 yards...
  6. S

    Most likely source of discrepancy between ballistics app and actual shots (.308 @ 600 yds)

    Thanks but seems a fair bit off topic. Error located, it was significant. Remaining factors are ALL insignificant compared to the G1/G7 issue. I work in the engineering software simulation space and one of my motto's is "garbage in, garbage out." The chrono was calibrated by the factory. By...
  7. S

    Most likely source of discrepancy between ballistics app and actual shots (.308 @ 600 yds)

    Thanks Cory/LL. Just before your post LL - I found the problem and it appears to be a bug in Shooter. I re-entered my round from scratch and it auto-populated a drastically different BC than the one already stored (also auto-populated upon initial entry). Again my intent was to use Litz BC with...
  8. S

    Most likely source of discrepancy between ballistics app and actual shots (.308 @ 600 yds)

    I found one or more online sources for this round in the same length barrel providing a corroborating mv. I also chronoed FGMM 168 gr at 2583 (yes I know not the same powder or powder weight). Nothing perfect here but I hope to not have to invest in a big complicated chrono system. Even a change...
  9. S

    Most likely source of discrepancy between ballistics app and actual shots (.308 @ 600 yds)

    Thanks for the cordial response on the "stupid questions" section. I perhaps mistakenly assumed that meant "no such thing as a stupid question". I provided the Chronograph type in the OP. It is a magnetic Magnetospeed barrel mounted chrono that has been tested by the prestigious Southwest...
  10. S

    Most likely source of discrepancy between ballistics app and actual shots (.308 @ 600 yds)

    Using fully manual atmospheric conditions instead of pulling them automatically and using 77 °F, 0 ft elevation and 29.92" Hg (quite a few slightly different definitions of std. conditions) still gives me 4.0 mils. Spin drift and coriolis are enabled but certainly insignificant. Being here in...
  11. S

    Most likely source of discrepancy between ballistics app and actual shots (.308 @ 600 yds)

    -20" Remington .308, heavy barrel -1:10 rifling -SWFA 5-20 SS scope (have not verified travel and return to zero, trusting the manufacturer) -100 yard zero (sub-MOA capable but typically shoots 1-2 MOA, overall not too happy with this) -scope height: 1.85" -Hornady TAP A-MAX 168 gr (factory...
  12. S

    Most likely source of discrepancy between ballistics app and actual shots (.308 @ 600 yds)

    Perhaps in order of significance or likelihood, what are the factors in a ballstics app most likely to be the source of discrepancies between required actual elevation and predicted elevation? I think I can safely assume that my chrono data, ballistics model and coefficients are good to go. The...
  13. S

    Rifle Scopes Zero stops for SWFA Super Sniper Scopes

    Bought 2 sets, funds sent by paypal. I take it no risk of less engagement between turret and spindle, no risk of set screw not having plenty of space to grab?
  14. S

    Repr 16.1 spiral vs Scar 17

    Some counterpoints: -Mag availability comes and goes, stock up when you need to, then no worries -I run the Troy Micro flip up tritium sights, work great. That being said there are not many sights short enough for the large rail to barrel height. -Thin barrel hasn't prevented many of us...
  15. S

    Action Screw Torque Accuracy Test.

    A big +1, this is right on the money. +1 to the other skeptics as well. Heck there is not even a control established here by shooting whatever strings/groups with no changes to torque. Once that is done some basic statistics on comparison of means is required. The proper procedure is called...
  16. S

    Why a bolt gun?

    Not true, neither in theory nor in practice. Case and point is that a modern jumbo jet is orders of magnitude more reliable than a small single piston engine Cessna. More in the firearms domain I'd guarantee the best top end semi-autos are more reliable then the bottom of the barrel cheapo bolt...
  17. S

    Remington 700 Tactical 16.5" 308 (85538)?

    Cool. You're probably already aware of this feature but just in case not - OnTarget has a calibration feature. For example when I use 3" ShootNC's their OD is exactly 3.0". I draw the calibrate line across it and enter 3 then I am good to go.
  18. S

    Remington 700 Tactical 16.5" 308 (85538)?

    Nice rifle. Not to be too much of a stickler but are you sure that OnTarget is calibrated correctly. Your lower right group looks a bit larger than 0.88 MOA. It looks closer to 1 MOA. Didn't really look carefully at the others.