Search results

I find disrupting the flow of traffic is much more dangerous than going 10 mph over the limit and drivers driving in the left on the highway deserve a citation much more than the one passing them on the right going 10 mph past the limit. I drive my kids to school and see more drivers doing +20...

Speeding ticket question. I'd like to ask all the law abiding LEOs out there what is your main purpose for a speeding ticket and does quota ever play a role on giving someone a speeding ticket going 7 or 10 miles an hour over the limit on a 70 mph zone? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Was wondering if you considered that the 3-27 S&B was defective and tried to reach out to Eurooptics(If you haven't already) or S&B for a replacement. Are they aware of the ongoing test you are performing with a scope that resulted in such poor ranging results? If not, I would think once...

Either that or he really had some time to kill. No offense to ptosis. It is something to think about.

Don't get me wrong I will be happy as well but a successful business model should not include damaging the relationship one has with existing customers and there can be a way to please both while creating a new trend. They have done well and supported the shooting community as well as one can...

Would like to hear if existing owners of Steiner scopes agree with you.

Many have been questioning the huge difference in pricing between the 5-25 and 3-27 with no real answer.....so far.

This is what happens when a Manufacturer decides to launch a new product at the same price or much lower. The Steiner T5XI 5-25x56-Pre-order MSRP is $1899.00 way below the existing MSRP $3k+ of their existing Military 5-25. I really don't know what Steiner was thinking when they did this since...

The scopes that are already out(Rob01, rw496 etc...) was the first shipment out from Vortex. The second shipment is due mid to end of this month, per Vortex conversation. Called Cameraland and confirmed they are getting a shipment by the end of this month. I ordered and paid for an MOA and was...

To those who have and are sacrificing everything to grant me and my family the freedom we enjoy every single day......today we honor you, Thank you. Happy 4th of July everyone!!!

I wanted to cerakote my rifle to match the scope so I called Vortex to get their take on the color. Of course cerakoting to match an anodized finish is hard onto itself but they also said that batches will differ in shade so some will be darker or lighter than others. Clearly the picture you...

You are a fucking Dummy. It's Fucktards like you I wish to bump into every day. Fuck off and die on another Forum you Troll.

First off, Thank you for doing this. Secondly, thank you for doing this. Can't speak for anyone else, but I come here for this. It won't make me decide, but it will help me decide. Now all we need is for someone to do this with "RIFLES", "AMMO" and everything else involved in helping us decide...

One thing I noticed that they might not have tested or will test is "Eye Relief". Not sure if it's as important for others as it is for me but I have given up a very good scope because of it. I guess it's a comfort zone thing, for me at least. I guess it just reinforces LL's and others...

Optical Performance Results – Part 2 ARE IN The Kahles K 6-24×56 rifle scope offered the widest field of view at 18x magnification with 7.2 feet at 100 yards, which is quite impressive. But the Valdada IOR RECON 4-28×50, Schmidt and Bender PMII 5-25×56, Nightforce BEAST 5-25×56, Nightforce...

So this is how the test goes: Optical Performance Results – Part 1(Finished) Provides summary and overall score for optical performance. Explain optical clarity was measured (i.e. image quality), and provides detailed results for those tests. Optical Performance Results – Part 2 (coming soon)...

If I'm not mistaken and if I am please be gentle. The parallax setting should be set according to magnification and should be the same for every eye as long as the diopter is adjusted for that eye. So I believe if the magnification setting was set at 18x and the the initial parallax adjustment...

Were the testers allowed to adjust the diopter on each scope they were behind.

If it was only the ATACR that did better than the Beast I can turn a blind eye.......but the NXS? Makes me think they're doing something wrong but clearly I am by no means someone who can make such a claim. Would like someone that does have the knowledge to chime in and get their take on it.

I'm curious how the NF ATACR and NF NXS have rated better optical clarity than the Beast. Hasn't everyone been saying, including NF that the Glass was upgraded and clearer? Could this be right?