Re: 284 Winchester, should I switch to this round?
mwroseberry,
The .284 Win is an excellent round. It was originally designed to work out of a short action..."as a hunting round." That means light short ogive bullets. Heavy bullets had to get pushed down deep in the case a little. That so it would cycle through a Win model 88 or 100. But they still performed respectably.
The case size was so they could get .280 Rem power out of a short action. Problem was, no one ever looked at this as a target round. In fact, no one looked at the 6.5-.284 as a target round until twenty years after the .284 came out and a wildcatter necked his version down to 6.5mm. It was really when long bullets started getting made on a mainstream basis that the 6.5-284, then the .284, got looked at as viable target cartridges. Of course the 7mm Rem mag won at Perry in '68 but that didn't seem to matter.
So, bottom line, the .284 is safe in either a long or short action. It's going to do you a lot better in a long action because you can load bullets out a ways and still run them through a magazine. If you single feed, as in LR, BR or F-class, a short action won't be an issue. If you want to use this as a tactical comp rifle then long action is what I'd suggest. You don't have to worry about magazine length and chase out the lands as far as they'll go.
FWIW, your last statement about going ".308" because it would be easier is a classic cop-out. If you're going to build a long range rifle with some serious capability, then do that while it's one cost. It doesn't cost anymore than you would spend on a .308 to get into a .284. So get the performance instead of the standard and do something with it.
The .284 can launch high BC bullets out in the high deserts of the West out to one mile. (hot days high altitude) Yes, accuracy to one mile. The .308 can only dream of that.