300 Win Mag - Norma 217 Results

Ryguy

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 1, 2013
143
6
Las Vegas
If you suspect N-217 to be the same powder as RL 25 then you may very well be correct.
I read the two powders are nearly identical if not the very same and after today, I am convinced they are identical. The 208 Amax calls for 70.0 to 73 gr of RL 25, according to Alliant. Using Federal brass and 215GM primers, I started at 70 gr of N-217 which showed an average velocity of 2817. 72.5 gr printed the best with a 1.435" three shot group at 300 yards and showed 2887 fps from a 28" 5R Krieger. The SD at 72.5 gr with 5 shots showed 9. I moved all the way to 74.5 gr but accuracy fell way off and the bolt became heavy with enough primer cratering to call it quits. It was 81F with 22% Humidity and 5-13 mph 270 degree wind at 3100 elevation. I expected to get more velocity, closer to 3000 because according to Norma, "217 matches the .338 Lapua perfect." I call BS on that. Maybe perfect for heavy 7mm Mag but way to fast for "perfect" in the 338 Lapua. Also, this is a brand new gun sporting a Grizzly Gunworks brake and I can tell you, the Fat Bastard is a better brake. I have about 3 pounds of H1000 and 6 pounds of VV N570 which have very well known loads so I am going to try RL 33 next. I think I will start with Retumbo data for RL 33 and stop when pressure shows up, expecting it to be around 82 gr. I would like to thank everyone here for such insight with precision rifles, if anyone reads this.
 
The Norma 217 is indeed not the best powder for a 338 Lapua, it is not far off from the old MRP 2.
N570 would be my first choice for the 338.

The 217 has not been a huge success for Norma like the old MRP 2, and why they wanted to change it is beyond my understanding.
While not identical the powders are both produced in the same plant in Sweden and with very similar burn rate they are closely related.
It is slower then the old MRP 2 for sure, and RL 25 by a tiny bit.

A 300 WM, 7 RM and 7 UM etc are more fitting calibers for it.