Range Report 338 Lapua ballistic charts

81mike

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 23, 2009
17
0
47
Lebanon, MO
Since I am incompetent with the site's search engine, would one of you pro's direct me to a quality ballistics chart for the 338 Lapua 300gr. SMK? I know its here somewhere, I just can't seem to find it.

Thanks for the help
 
Re: 338 Lapua ballistic charts

And excellent programs they are, too - accurate and easy to use.

If you zero at shorter ranges, the change from the zero conditions to the shooting conditions won't have much effect.

<span style="font-style: italic">However</span>, the change in muzzle velocity with temperature at longer distances <span style="text-decoration: underline">will</span>, as you know, have a significant effect. And many shooters neglect to compensate for that change. Actually, not many shooters even have a good idea what that change is for their load.
 
Re: 338 Lapua ballistic charts

Lindy, maybe a bone head question, but, if using a DA chart, won't the temperature changes be factored in? If not, how do you compensate for the changes aside from trial and error and DOPE tweeking? Do you load different loads for different expected temps (with accompanying DA charts)?
 
Re: 338 Lapua ballistic charts

A DA chart compensates for the changes in atmospheric drag as a result of temperature changes. I find it easier to compensate manually for changes in muzzle velocity as a result of temperature change - see my recommendation for that in Making Ballistic Cards Using Density Altitude.

However, note that Brad's JBM ballistic card program <span style="font-weight: bold">will</span> include a change of muzzle velocity with temperature in its calculations, if you know what the change for your load is, and you tell the program to use it.

Doing that, for me, results in a lot more output from the program than I want, so I don't do that. But my way is not the only way.
 
Re: 338 Lapua ballistic charts

I read your article quite a while back and should have re-read it before asking. You covered it very well. Thanks.