- Thread starter padfoot 37
- Start date
Feniks Technologies
Premium Ammunition and Loading Supplies
Supporter
Commercial Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
There’s no free lunch.
Every single “load development” method that emphasizes low round count and conserving components is snake oil.
The reason everyone mostly gets good results is that it’s extremely hard to make bad ammunition with modern components and equipment.
Think about the logic behind the single shot Satterlee method:
You are adding powder (a combustible material) and you get the same velocity as less powder.
Does that sound correct?
Every single “load development” method that emphasizes low round count and conserving components is snake oil.
The reason everyone mostly gets good results is that it’s extremely hard to make bad ammunition with modern components and equipment.
Think about the logic behind the single shot Satterlee method:
You are adding powder (a combustible material) and you get the same velocity as less powder.
Does that sound correct?
Similar threads
