Maggie’s 53 seconds

[GardDog]

For 11 years old, not bad.


<object width="425" height="350"> <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/irykjLjuKo8&feature=youtube_gdata "></param> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param> <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/irykjLjuKo8&feature=youtube_gdata " type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"> </embed></object>

 

[Queequeg]

Re: 53 seconds

I saved this a while back to aid my daughters priorities!

 

[MCC]

Re: 53 seconds

That's impressive

 

[cavscout1983]

Re: 53 seconds

Not a proper function check, but good.

 

[E3C3H3O3]

Re: 53 seconds

very impressive

 

[Guest]

Re: 53 seconds

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: CavScout1983</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Not a proper function check, but good.

</div></div>

This.
Function Check with finger on the trigger? May as well not even do it.
Cool though.

 

[300WSM]

Re: 53 seconds

not bad for 11

 

[Werewolf]

Re: 53 seconds

Beats the hell out of playing with Barbie Dolls.

 

[Maser]

Re: 53 seconds

Kinda slow, but then again I was doing that when I was 7 not 11.

 

[barrett1142]

Re: 53 seconds

She didn't get the hand guards. Still not a bad time for 11

 

[High Binder]

Re: 53 seconds

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Werewolf74</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Beats the hell out of playing with Barbie Dolls. </div></div>

Nothing Beats Playing With Barbie!

 

[The Mechanic]

Re: 53 seconds

She has a video of her doing a shoot, and I have to say she could kick 75% of the guys out there and all the Masers even with air soft