• 1 WEEK LEFT: This Target Haunts Me Contest

    Tell us about the one that got away, the flier that ruined your group, the zero that drifted, the shot you still see when you close your eyes. Winner will receive a free scope!

    Join contest

6BR-Reloader 17 vs H4895

83Scout

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Mar 26, 2019
198
40
Has anyone used H4895 and Rl-17 that can give some input as to velocity achieved and temp stability with the BR? I would assume both of these would be ideal for the 95-105 weight.
 
Just curious-is it too slow, case capacity not there or what? I’m trying to find a couple powders to try besides the usual Varget loads. I have used some 8208 in a Grendel that did pretty well.
 
A few buddies and I all run H4895 in our BR's. Very temp stable. I have tested Varget as well, shot great, required much more powder to achieve the H4895 speeds.

Load:
29.6gn of H4895
CCI 450 primers
105 Berger Hybrids .0025 jump

2850fps SD 4

Varget was around 31gn's to get the same speeds...But I know a few folks that have great success with it.
 
A few buddies and I all run H4895 in our BR's. Very temp stable. I have tested Varget as well, shot great, required much more powder to achieve the H4895 speeds.

Load:
29.6gn of H4895
CCI 450 primers
105 Berger Hybrids .0025 jump

2850fps SD 4

Varget was around 31gn's to get the same speeds...But I know a few folks that have great success with it.

That’s what I was wondering about with Varget. Seems like by the time I have the same speed with Varget I’ve already started getting pressure signs.
 
Yes RL17 is most likely too slow. As far as capacity I have no idea. I run 8208 XBR on my 6mm BR 29.5 grains yields 3000 FPS with a 95 tmk and a 26” barrel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 83Scout