Accurate 4350 in place of H4350 for .260

[nso123]

I know that the loads would be different, but does the Accurate 4350 work as well in a .260 as the H4350?

 

[shoot4fun]

Re: Accurate 4350 in place of H4350 for .260

Never tried AA4350. It has a similar load density and burn rate (slightly slower than H4350 per burn rate chart) and is a short cut powder. In the current state of things as to availability, if I had an opportunity to try it I probably would. I do use a couple of the AA powders and have had good luck with them so far.

 

[ChrisGarrett]

Re: Accurate 4350 in place of H4350 for .260

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: NSO123</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I know that the loads would be different, but does the Accurate 4350 work as well in a .260 as the H4350? </div></div>

I loaded up three pounds worth in the 260 for my budddy, under the 140 AMAX and 142 SMKs and except for it being a bit longer than H-4350 and therefore not metering all that well through traditional measures, the numbers were very close to H-4350 and it's cheaper.

If you can't find H-4350, AA-4350 is a nice substitute.

Chris

 

[ezee]

Re: Accurate 4350 in place of H4350 for .260

Good to know. Always loaded H-4350 for 260. Running low, picked up 8 lbs AA-4350 based on similar burn rate. Like temp stability of H-4350 though, but can't find it.