Adding insult to injury
- Thread starter timesublime
- Start date
Those Vegas casino corporations are some of the most vile scum you can get in the corporate world.
This is one time where I hope a bunch of the victims get a bunch of the best ambulance chasing lawyers to sue the ever loving stuffing out of MGM
I'm sure MGM wanted to try to pull this stuff as the judges in that whole area are totally in the pockets of the big casino corporations, just like their entire legal system and the local politicians.
This is one time where I hope a bunch of the victims get a bunch of the best ambulance chasing lawyers to sue the ever loving stuffing out of MGM
I'm sure MGM wanted to try to pull this stuff as the judges in that whole area are totally in the pockets of the big casino corporations, just like their entire legal system and the local politicians.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but you hardly ever hear about this from like a week after it happened. It just went down the drain and disappeared. I think this is the first I've heard anything about it since maybe two weeks after it happened. We know more about a shooting that killed five people than this thing. That is weird.
It's nothing but a quick punt, to insure it moves to fed court. In the long run it's a smart move on their part, ties evidence/discloseure up for years upon years, if they have something to hide! In the mean time the shit hole will be sold, an the new owners (same ass holes, different name/s) have no burden. They only lose money for paid high price words, nothing more.
Didnt mean to trash your town. Actually, the couple of times Ive been there, most of the folks Ive met were very nice. I just dont like what the casinos represent, but I see how some could enjoy them.
Hopefully MGM will force all the evidence into discovery and it will shed some light on what happened out there.
Interesting to see if the victims get victimized a second time as MGM gets paid out by the taxpayers in order to hide something.
Interesting to see if the victims get victimized a second time as MGM gets paid out by the taxpayers in order to hide something.
Weather, cost of living, service quality, couple of good shooting ranges, desert, gambling, food ...
Not sure why the hotel should be liable anyway. If the victims win in court, it sets a VERY bad precedent. Who wants to deal with going through TSA type security every time you go into a building. I sure don’t, and that’s exactly what will happen if MGM is held responsible for one asshole customers actions. It’s not the gun, it’s the person, remember?
In the Colorado shooting, the theater wasn't held liable for what Holmes did. Why should the casino be treated different?
I'd agree it's not their fault, except the guy got how many weapons into the room? I suppose it comes down to whether or not he was covert enough to prevent any suspicion. I figured a casino had better security than that.
I don't know all the ins and outs so I guess we'll see. I do know the casino has more than enough to help the victims.
I don't know all the ins and outs so I guess we'll see. I do know the casino has more than enough to help the victims.
I’m thinking the incompetence of the delay in response was on them. It took about 72 minutes for the cops to breach the door. Before that, they sent one guy to the door to check what was going on and he got shot at.
Similar threads
