Anarchists at UT Austin Advocating Fire-Bombing Police

Veer_G

Veer_G

Beware of the Dildópony!
Full Member
Minuteman
Jun 15, 2008
12,971
15,279
SEPA
#1
Dear Parents of Anarchist University Students:

Please be understanding if you should next see your children with a forensic Y-incision on a stainless steel tray.

Before that happens, try and talk some sense into them, before batons and OC aren't enough.

Thank you. You can go ahead and enjoy your latté now.

...

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-14/antifa-group-proposes-law-enforcement-incineration-day

...

https://twitter.com/ASN_Austin/status/950771734310936576

[IMG2=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","height":"770","width":"600","src":"https:\/\/i.imgur.com\/l16zbXH.png?1"}[/IMG2]

https://sassatx.wordpress.com/
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dewey7271
#11
In the 70s, California was a great place to live, then came the shift in power. Oregon and Washington toppled soon thereafter. New Mexico and Colorado have both fallen since, Florida and North Carolina are tipping over the edge right now. Texas is a couple decades away from suffering the same fate, with their cities calling the shots for the rest of the state.
 
#14
Reagan fuked Cali when he signed off on amnesty, Trump will fuck America when he signs off on DACA , we are all going to be living like California in a decade after Trump betrays America with his new swamp buddies. Arm Up Freedom Lovers, the day is near.

Redmanss said:
In the 70s, California was a great place to live, then came the shift in power. Oregon and Washington toppled soon thereafter. New Mexico and Colorado have both fallen since, Florida and North Carolina are tipping over the edge right now. Texas is a couple decades away from suffering the same fate, with their cities calling the shots for the rest of the state.
Click to expand...
 
#17
With any luck the start of the next mini ice age will happen around 2025 to 2030 and that might just fix a lot of issues, or at least be a great opportunity to fix things.

I have my doubts on if I'll be able to stay in Texas when I retire, but it seems not just the world, but also the USA is running out of places for Freedom loving people to live in peace and eventually those who love freedom may have to put their foot down and take back freedom across the country & the world (or let it vanish for the next several centuries / millennia).
 
#18
While I'm all for freedom of speech, how is it that recommending police be firebombed is not considered incitement to riot, sedition, or some other kind of incitement to anarchy?

I wonder if ANTIFA's would apply the same "freedom of speech" for people recommending the firebombing and/or other method of assassination of anyone who looks like an Antifa supporter?
 
#21
I answered with a question. There is nothing wrong with incitement or even calling for revolution, hell that's how we got started. I personally would not mind another revolution to dismantle the UNconstitutional government we have in place. If that scares you, boo fuking hoo.
 
Last edited:
#22
Fair enough. I thought there were laws against fomenting riot and anarchy. I could be wrong, and readily admit I am not familiar with the laws in Texas, hence my question. I was seeking information, not trying to start an internet conflict...it is unfortunate that my inquiry upset you. However, it does interest me when anarchists and revolutionists out themselves, it doesn't scare me though. Enjoy your day.
 
#23
There might be laws against it, but they are unconstitutional so they are not worth the paper they are written on. It didn't upset me at all and I dislike these sumbitches as much as you do, my point is let them over play their hand , they don't have as much support as they think they do, no need to call the cops or for new meaningless laws every time shitbords do shitbord things. You have a good one too.
 
#24
I agree about allowing them to overplay their hand. While there are plenty of laws that you, or I may believe to be unconstitutional, until they are taken off the books, or overturned by the courts, some idiot somewhere can decide to act based on those laws, and at someone else's expense. Hopefully, Trump will get enough Supreme Court appointees to begin overturning some of those laws, and some of the court decisions that have screwed things up.
 
#25
Rioting pretty much never actually gets anything positive accomplished. It's usually a tactic of communists, Marxists, race baiters and other hard left radicals all of which simply want to use the rabble as a tool to kick out the established order & put in a new just as bad order, but one with them as the new "most advantaged" leaders.

Generally once you go up in the ranks of intelligence while not turning into a liberal airhead, you tend to find more effective ways of changing things. Such as getting off your rear end and getting very active politically and trying your best to get everybody else to head to the polls etc.

Also if you really want to build a better society in an intelligent way, you usually don't riot as all you wind up doing is often clashing with and causing harm to the foot soldiers of order in society which is counter productive, what you actually want to do is use great amounts of intelligence and planning to deal with those who call the shots and order the evils that you are against.

You may have to one day resort to violence if your country is too far gone for any peaceful means, but again random violence in the streets doesn't usually help anything.

No matter what point in human history you are at, pretty much no government ever has tolerated people calling for the violent overthrow of said government, so if you are going to incite a violent revolution, "freedom" or not, expect the government to be looking to shut you down using all resources at their disposal.
 
#26
ArmyJerry said:
I answered with a question. There is nothing wrong with incitement or even calling for revolution, hell that's how we got started. I personally would not mind another revolution to dismantle the constitutional government we have in place. If that scares you, boo fuking hoo.
Click to expand...

Easy there, big fella. Gettin' kinda close to the s-word, aren'tcha?
 
#28
#29
ArmyJerry,
I am in complete agreement that many of the decisions made by various courts area large part of the problem. Especially the federal 9th circuit. My current plan is to continue voting and hoping for Trump will continue appointing more judges that will follow the constitution. I'm hopeful that an actual shooting civil war and anarchy can be avoided.
 
#30
Unknown said:
ArmyJerry,
I am in complete agreement that many of the decisions made by various courts area large part of the problem. Especially the federal 9th circuit. My current plan is to continue voting and hoping for Trump will continue appointing more judges that will follow the constitution. I'm hopeful that an actual shooting civil war and anarchy can be avoided.
Click to expand...

The catharsis of civil war seems acceptable to some, and even more so if it's unlikely that they would be in the field. If I want to sashay down the primrose path towards embracing armed conflict, I'd just as soon not be shoved along it by someone co-opting my utterances to their end.
 
#31
It will be really interesting to learn what is contained in the "secret memo" that the democrats are trying to keep secret. I suspect that it may blow the top off of some things that would really hurt some of the corrupt. If the contents of that memo helps "drain the swamp" I welcome it.

Some things just don't change all that much. In the 1960's Bob Dylan said: "don't stand in the doorway, don't block up the hall, for he that gets hurt will be he who has stalled....the battle outside raging. Get out of the new road if you can't lend a hand, the times, they are a'changin'."
 
#33
Snuby642 said:
Antifia should be labled a terrorist group and rounded up.
Till then look for the one with the gas can, and the loudspeaker!
Click to expand...
Target priority list
1. Anyone who acts like a leader
2. Anyone who looks like a leader
3. Anyone in a comms role (radio, phone, video)
4. Anyone looking to set shit on fire
5. Anyone with a rifle
6. Everyone else
 
#34
I'm not sure of the protocol of demestic terror suppression.
Should i take them all out or let one go bleeding slightly.

In theory to warn others of my turf?
Or , just pile them up downrange?
 
#35
ArmyJerry said:
my point is let them over play their hand , they don't have as much support as they think they do, no need to call the cops or for new meaningless laws every time shitbords do shitbord things.
Click to expand...

I totally agree with this position.

As much as I shake my head daily when I see this crap and these POS, millennial fucks; I don't live in a large city. Nothing that goes on in any of the population centers affects me or mine. Boston is 90 miles away. At some point, we may need to take a stand but for now I am just enjoying the show and not letting this bother me too much. The more we clamor, the worse it gets. I want fewer laws not more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts