Re: ar-15 question
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: marduk185</div><div class="ubbcode-body">the immediate question that smacks me on the arse and then just walks away is this, why?
5.56 is anemic out of a full length rifle and any advantages gained from anything less than legal(16" barrel) length will be negligible when compared with the loss of terminal and exterior ballistics performance. course it may look cool for your mall ninja friends,soo..... </div></div>
Are you spouting opinion, or do you have real data to share?
A 10" vs. a 16" barrel will cause a 2-400 fps loss in velocity. That still puts it at about 2700 fps, which is the same as many .308's. And more than enuf for anything I;d use a 223 for (300 yards and under)
Let's face it - were pretty much all civilians, so looks DO matter.
I find the short barrel upper to be much more manageable with a suppressor.
But please do share whatever data you've got.