With the million and one contours and thicknesses what would you say is the golden middleway?
When do you get the best Weight / thickness ratio?
When do you get the best Weight / thickness ratio?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If your game is just PRS, the current trend is heaviest barrel possible with a small caliber. Case in point, a friend and local PRS competitor just spun up a 1.35” straight cylinder 26” barrel in 6mm BR, dropped in an MPA chassis with a Razor 4.5-27 on it. We joke with him about it, but that rifle puts everything in one hole.
Okay, that’s one extreme.
Now, you ask how thin of a profile can you get before losing the benefits of a thick barrel. What do you see as the benefits of a heavy barrel?
As you have already seen, there is no free lunch and most everything has a trade off. It sounds like to me that you are asking the classic question of what barrel rifle can I build that will do everything? Except your asking it differently.
As usual, the answer to that question is that you cannot have your Cate and Edith too.
And this is something that I’ve beem wondering about of late. I find it interesting that they haven’t imposed a weight limit like most other rifle sports.If your game is just PRS, the current trend is heaviest barrel possible with a small caliber. Case in point, a friend and local PRS competitor just spun up a 1.35” straight cylinder 26” barrel in 6mm BR, dropped in an MPA chassis with a Razor 4.5-27 on it. We joke with him about it, but that rifle puts everything in one hole.
Okay, that’s one extreme.
Now, you ask how thin of a profile can you get before losing the benefits of a thick barrel. What do you see as the benefits of a heavy barrel?
As you have already seen, there is no free lunch and most everything has a trade off. It sounds like to me that you are asking the classic question of what barrel rifle can I build that will do everything? Except your asking it differently.
As usual, the answer to that question is that you cannot have your Cate and Edith too.
And this is something that I’ve beem wondering about of late. I find it interesting that they haven’t imposed a weight limit like most other rifle sports.
I have a 1.450x34 barrel for my next 375. And I have a mountain rifle contour (sub .5” @16”) for my coyote gun. Doubt the 375 will shoot any more or less precisely than the 6-47.
For a hunting fun and fairly light contour, a Winchester supergrade contour is nice.
For a do all kind of gun, a Remington varmint of light Palma contour is nice.
Now, you ask how thin of a profile can you get before losing the benefits of a thick barrel. What do you see as the benefits of a heavy barrel?
As you have already seen, there is no free lunch and most everything has a trade off. It sounds like to me that you are asking the classic question of what barrel rifle can I build that will do everything? Except your asking it differently.
As usual, the answer to that question is that you cannot have your Cate and Edith too.
This is exactly it. It’s about choosing the right tool for the job. You’ll sacrifice something somewhere for an ideal barrel because no one barrel is great at everythingI don't believe there is a single, "right" answer to your question.
It's a continuum, and the "best weight/thickness ratio" doesn't exist, at least as far as an research of which I'm aware.
Varmint/Hvy Varmint contours are a good "compromise" barrel heavy enough for target strings but not ridiculously heavy to where it's impractical to tote.
You’re as big a dork as me if you know who that is.Vague questions get vague answers and open the doors to the army of trolls always lurking and plotting.
View attachment 7120831