Re: Bartlein, Brux, or RockCreek? Cut rifled choice?
I have had a number of aftermarket button barrels. At this time I own a Lothar Walther, 2 Pac-Nor, Wilson, Shillen, and am getting a Broughton. I also recently sold a rifle with a Benchmark. Obviously, my opinions here are just that "opinions", and are entirely subjective, so take them as you will.
The Benchmark was probably the best barrel I have ever owned. It may have simply been that it was chambered by someone who really knew what he was doing, but it cleaned really easy, would shoot with sub moa accuracy any ammo, and was an excellent value. The rifle it was on was chambered in .260 Rem and it was more accurate than my GAP built .260 rifle with a Bartlein.
I have a Wilson SS 16" barrel on my AR rifle and it's every bit as accurate as my 18" SPR Kreiger AR rifle. They are both very accurate rifles, but the Wilson was about $250.00 chambered, and the Kreiger was about $425.00 chambered. That's a hell of a difference in money for no appreciable gain in accuracy or longevity.
My Lothar Walther barrel is also outstandingly accurate and was a bargain at a little over $300.00 chambered. It's as good or better than my Rock Creek barrel of the same caliber and length.
The Pac-Nor barrels are yet to be proven, they are 22LR and 17HMR, and I really have not had the time to find a brand of ammo they shine with. However, I did have the opportunity to run some 22LR Lapua Club, Wolf Match, and Remington Eley through them at a 100 yard indoor range and the rifle shot very well with all three, so I would say Pac-Nor is making a quality barrel as well. By the way, I paid $180.00 for my 22LR Pac-Nor!
The Shillen I have was a mistake, I ordered a Lothar Walther from my smith to go on a 25-06 Antelope rifle. He screwed up and ordered a Shillen Hand Select SS instead. Well, the only real mistake in this deal was thinking Shillen didn't make a quality barrel. The rifle is a hammer (easily a 1/2 moa gun) with hunting bullets. I think the Shillen was a bit more expensive than the LW barrel I specified for the build, but I'm very satisfied with it.
It seems there is a lot of emphasis here on the Hide to build rifles with the very best, and most expensive components. I'm not saying this is misdirected funds, if you got fat stacks to burn by all means get what you want. However, I think you can get top button barrels for 25% to 30% less money than cut rifle barrels, and you can put that leftover money towards a good shooting school or ammo. I also doubt you will see much or any difference in your groups. I could make the same argument about scopes, stocks, and all kinds of other gear. I'm pretty sure that I could go shoot a match with the most expensive, souped up, state of the art rifle/scope/caliber combo you can think of, and I'm still going to place where I normally place at a match. My problem is not that I run a GAP built .260Rem, Manners, S&B, Rock Creek barreled hot rod rifle. My problem is that I don't spend enough time dry firing, practicing positional shooting, and sending rounds at my local range on a regular basis. I have shot matches using my .308 and my .260 rifles, each one has had barrels made by various makers. My scores are pretty consistent. It ain't the gun, it's the nut behind the trigger.