I did some quick testing of mv on some 308 loads yesterday. It was not statistically significant but the results set me thinking and I would appreciate some input.
I had loaded 155gr Scenars in Lapua brass with RL15; some 180gr SMK in Federal brass with RL17 which was a slightly compressed load; and some 168gr AMAX in Federal brass with RL15. All 210 primers. There are reasons for this odd mix which I will not bore you with.
Point was that the 155gr and 168gr has SD's of 19 and 13 while the SMK was 8. This compared with a commercial Federal load with sd of 30fps.
The test was too small to be statistically significant, but it got me wondering about what the key elements of consistency are.
I guess the physical dimensions of case and bullet will be fundamental, so quality components plus reloading consistency are important but what about powder, primers etc.
Are some powders just more consistent than others?
Are compressed loads an advantage?
Is any component variance masked by reloading variances?
Should I just get a beer and chill?
I had loaded 155gr Scenars in Lapua brass with RL15; some 180gr SMK in Federal brass with RL17 which was a slightly compressed load; and some 168gr AMAX in Federal brass with RL15. All 210 primers. There are reasons for this odd mix which I will not bore you with.
Point was that the 155gr and 168gr has SD's of 19 and 13 while the SMK was 8. This compared with a commercial Federal load with sd of 30fps.
The test was too small to be statistically significant, but it got me wondering about what the key elements of consistency are.
I guess the physical dimensions of case and bullet will be fundamental, so quality components plus reloading consistency are important but what about powder, primers etc.
Are some powders just more consistent than others?
Are compressed loads an advantage?
Is any component variance masked by reloading variances?
Should I just get a beer and chill?