Bloomberg might be out of the race

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 6, 2011
17,451
22,973
219
52
MA
I see your point but he is doing a fantastic job of it in the mean time. It's not like we ever or very rarely get any of these rights back after they are taken. Or atleast not before the big igloo.

He is doing a good job.........but its only a means to an end......its his present goal.......not his primary goal.
 

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 6, 2011
17,451
22,973
219
52
MA

2aBaCa

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Jan 27, 2019
2,487
2,174
119
Behind enemy lines Northern Commiefornia
  • Like
Reactions: TACC

Gatorshark

kaboom
Belligerents
Minuteman
Apr 16, 2018
214
136
49
I'll "contribute" 50,000 to your "campaign" if you will throw your support behind me...
 
  • Like
Reactions: TACC

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 6, 2011
17,451
22,973
219
52
MA
I think Biden released the info about "Stop/Frisk" because SC is do or die for him.

Bloomturd stands between him and continuing his failing bid for president.

After SC Biden will get on board with the Dem Party decision of who will be their candidate.

The candidate will never be Bernie.

It will be Bloomburg.

When Bloomburg eliminates Biden in SC the writing will be on the wall for Bernie.

At that point it gets interesting.

Bloomburg has bought loyalty. His mercenaries will only be as loyal as the cash flow expectation.

Bernies followers are fanatics.

Expect to watch the mortal combat of Bernie vs DNC chosen candidate Bloomburg.

It will be a strategic mistake for the Dems as it is going to play right into Trumps ideas of "buying elections", "Bernie got screwed", "Cheating Dems".

Bernie supporters have proven and expressed their abilities to become violent.

Interesting times ahead.
 

MtnCreek

Sergeant
Belligerents
Jan 6, 2012
7,883
12,249
219
If MC5 is still around maybe the dem's can get them to perform at the convention.
 

Longshot231

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Mar 8, 2018
2,357
8,576
119
I'll "contribute" 50,000 to your "campaign" if you will throw your support behind me...
Even worse was that he was bribing congressmen to impeach the president.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...a80f52-1b7c-11ea-8d58-5ac3600967a1_story.html

18 U.S. Code § 201.Bribery of public officials and witnesses:

(a)For the purpose of this section—

(1)the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;

(2)the term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and

(3)the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit.

(b)Whoever—

(1)directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—

(A)to influence any official act; or

(B)to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C)to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;

(2)being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:

(A)being influenced in the performance of any official act;

(B)being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C)being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;

(3)directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;

(4)directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for absenting himself therefrom; shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

(c)Whoever—

(1)otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty—

(A)directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or

(B)being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

(2)directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;

(3)directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.

(d)Paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c) shall not be construed to prohibit the payment or receipt of witness fees provided by law, or the payment, by the party upon whose behalf a witness is called and receipt by a witness, of the reasonable cost of travel and subsistence incurred and the reasonable value of time lost in attendance at any such trial, hearing, or proceeding, or in the case of expert witnesses, a reasonable fee for time spent in the preparation of such opinion, and in appearing and testifying.

(e)The offenses and penalties prescribed in this section are separate from and in addition to those prescribed in sections 1503, 1504, and 1505 of this title.
 

Rthur

Philomath
Belligerents
Apr 16, 2010
10,643
12,327
219
51
Not Chicago, Illinios
Even worse was that he was bribing congressmen to impeach the president.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...a80f52-1b7c-11ea-8d58-5ac3600967a1_story.html

18 U.S. Code § 201.Bribery of public officials and witnesses:

(a)For the purpose of this section—

(1)the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;

(2)the term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and

(3)the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit.

(b)Whoever—

(1)directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—

(A)to influence any official act; or

(B)to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C)to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;

(2)being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:

(A)being influenced in the performance of any official act;

(B)being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

(C)being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;

(3)directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;

(4)directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for absenting himself therefrom; shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

(c)Whoever—

(1)otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty—

(A)directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or

(B)being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;

(2)directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;

(3)directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.

(d)Paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c) shall not be construed to prohibit the payment or receipt of witness fees provided by law, or the payment, by the party upon whose behalf a witness is called and receipt by a witness, of the reasonable cost of travel and subsistence incurred and the reasonable value of time lost in attendance at any such trial, hearing, or proceeding, or in the case of expert witnesses, a reasonable fee for time spent in the preparation of such opinion, and in appearing and testifying.

(e)The offenses and penalties prescribed in this section are separate from and in addition to those prescribed in sections 1503, 1504, and 1505 of this title.
Lol, may as well print that on shit paper to at least get some use out of it.
They'll never bite the hand that feeds them.

R
 
  • Like
Reactions: jungle45

Dunraven

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Minuteman
Feb 1, 2019
640
526
99
How ironic that of all the absurd things that spew from liberal mouths, the one thing that gets them called out is for telling the truth!
 

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 6, 2011
17,451
22,973
219
52
MA
Latest Bloomberg commercials feature Barack Obama.

Betting BO soon issues his support.

Racist candidate be damned, win at any cost, your ass going to jail depends on it.

I wonder what a former President costs.....this one is under duress so it might be a bargain.
 
Last edited:

96coal449

Private
Minuteman
Jan 9, 2018
49
40
24
He is doing a good job.........but its only a means to an end......its his present goal.......not his primary goal.
After the destruction of the constitution is the goal behind that. The goal of the globalists. Adgenda21.......

The elimination of 6 billion people and the establishment of the NWO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ewoaf

acudaowner

Old Salt
Belligerents
Minuteman
Dec 26, 2018
2,628
1,555
119
well is money was and is always still in play . not that is ever going to be a good thing either way .
 
  • Like
Reactions: gunman_7

OldSalty

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Nov 1, 2019
1,687
2,298
119
I will not be a bit surprised if mike wins the nomination.

And agree with @pmclaine about the BO endorsement. I could see BO endorsing mike.

I listen to the radio all day while working. There are probably 10 bloomberg commercials per hour. In a state that Trump carried easily. The new commercials featuring BO.

The only question IMO is will "the bern" supporters hold their nose and vote for mikey when the bern is screwed again?

IMO the bern is not electable (dems know this).

I think mike has played it very smart thus far. And IMO mike is a much bigger threat to win the presidency than any of the other dem canidates. Watch how mike starts to "climb" in the polls, gain steam, hit his stride etc. Media will slowly start to back mike as the DNC starts to rachet-up the machine. They are doing it slowly as to appease bern supporters and to keep them from going full tilt out of the gate.

Could be wrong of course but just how I see it.
 

nso123

High Speed Steel Stinger
Belligerents
Mar 20, 2010
657
82
34
Tennessee
The establishment dems know that Biden is done, and that Bernie and Buttigieg can't be players in the election. Bloomberg will be the horse they bet on, even if it takes a brokered convention.
 

lawofsavage

Deplorable
Banned !
Belligerents
Jul 13, 2012
1,160
279
189
Birmingham, AL
the buttmayor and midget mikey are in a heated battle right now to see which non-Bernie dim candidate will be ahead at the right time haha
 

Doc68

Almost a doctor
Belligerents
Feb 17, 2014
1,439
1,298
219
CO, Fort Carson
He's still in it. It's part of his bigger plan to win in 2024. He knows he doesn't have chance in 2020. Not even the Dem nomination. So he's gonna run as an Independent and split the vote so Trump will win which, in his mind, will set him up for winning in 2024 when there is no incumbent and fresh faces on both sides. He's gotta plan, watch it unfold. Just like his gun control agenda in CO (2012), VA (2019), OK, MO, WY, and AZ (2020). Coming soon to a conservative State near you.

 
  • Like
Reactions: MediumSpeed

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 6, 2011
17,451
22,973
219
52
MA
Wait for it......











Sure she has proven she is a well liked successful candidate that really motivates people........

and I don't go to Drudge anymore.

It was like overnight a switch was flipped and the tenor of that place went full lib.

Someone must have pictures of him with a woman they are threatening to expose him as straight.
 
Last edited:

vh20

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Dec 2, 2012
2,407
1,474
219
55
Funny, the title of this thread, and it was only started on Tuesday. Now it's just Saturday and everywhere you look they're all expecting him to jump to the front. All that "stuff" he said in the past just washed right out with a good cash-rinse. I said here the day I saw his first ad, he's going to be their guy, and I still believe it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSalty

pmclaine

Gunny Sergeant
Belligerents
Nov 6, 2011
17,451
22,973
219
52
MA
Funny, the title of this thread, and it was only started on Tuesday. Now it's just Saturday and everywhere you look they're all expecting him to jump to the front. All that "stuff" he said in the past just washed right out with a good cash-rinse. I said here the day I saw his first ad, he's going to be their guy, and I still believe it.

MSM has to protect and promote the star of the moment as one of these times they will be right.

They are invested in a Dem win.

The alternative may mean jail for some of their nearest and dearest.
 

OldSalty

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Nov 1, 2019
1,687
2,298
119
bloomberg is gaining...who would have thought?

Is now second to "the bern" in some national polls.

Oh, and...due to a last minute poll is elgible for the LV debates.

You cannot make this up...LoL.
 

Longshot231

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Mar 8, 2018
2,357
8,576
119
The Democratic elitists are scared to death of a Bernie Sanders getting the nomination. That's how HRC got the nomination in 2016; when the DNC change the rules in the middle of the game to have "uncommitted" super-delegates at the convention.

The people overseeing the DNC want Bloomberg to get the nomination because they know, like we do, that right now, the US will not accept a Socialist as President.
 

OldSalty

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Nov 1, 2019
1,687
2,298
119
The Democratic elitists are scared to death of a Bernie Sanders getting the nomination. That's how HRC got the nomination in 2016; when the DNC change the rules in the middle of the game to have "uncommitted" super-delegates at the convention.

The people overseeing the DNC want Bloomberg to get the nomination because they know, like we do, that right now, the US will not accept a Socialist as President.
Yep, agree 100%

And IMO bloomberg could win the presidency as well. I know many will disagree.

The issue will be trying to get bern and minority supporters on-board.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Longshot231

Longshot231

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Mar 8, 2018
2,357
8,576
119
I have a theory. When Blumturd announced his candidacy, the polls weren't very conclusive about his chances for the nomination.

Comrade Bernie starts to gain points in the polls and now the establishment leaders in the DNC are going to panic.

They know that historically speaking, very liberal candidates don't win against conservative GOP candidates. Think McGovern v. Nixon, Mondale V. Reagan, Dukakis V. Bush and Gore V. Bush.

That's why Bill Clinton had always cast himself as a moderately conservative democrat the first time he ran. He saw the handwriting on the wall after the "republican revolution of 1994." He did because he saw that gun control and higher taxes pissed the proletariat off and he wanted to be reelected.

Obama hid his views on a lot of things. That's why you never heard or saw anything on Obama's past. That's why they tried to keep it quiet.

During the 2008 campaign, the DNC knew that HRC was like boiled spinach to a 5-year-old. No matter how you repackage it; that green stuff is still boiled spinach and the five-year-old isn't going to eat it.

Obama was just as liberal as HRC but he kept his views, especially same-sex marriage, under wraps. HRC as toxic. So the rules were changed to let super delegates vote at the convention. Enter BHO.

Then during the 2016 campaign it was a choice between HRC and Comrade Sanders. This time the DNC leaders felt that it was better to let toxic Hillary face Trump, who they underestimated.

Even Republicans felt that Trump was a long shot. Nevertheless, the DNC released the super-delegates to do to Sanders (in 2016) what they did to toxic Hillary back in 2008.

There's nobody that can stop Sanders now. Except Blumturd. Watch what happens at the convention if the race is tied between comrade Sanders and Blumturd. Enter... the super-delegates.

Another theory. Blumturd is rising in the polls. Polls can be bought and have been wrong before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DIBBS

OldSalty

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Nov 1, 2019
1,687
2,298
119
One thing we know for sure based on recent historical evidence..., polls don't lie.
LoL, yep.

And right now the dnc is using them to elevate bloomberg.

The media (dnc proxy) is slowing ramping up. It has been interesting to watch.

Poor bern supporters. ?
 

8pointer

Major Award Winner
Belligerents
Minuteman
Nov 20, 2018
1,667
1,369
119
LoL, yep.

And right now the dnc is using them to elevate bloomberg.

The media (dnc proxy) is slowing ramping up. It has been interesting to watch.

Poor bern supporters. ?
On the surface Bernie drives me nuts when I listen to his ideas on taxation and programs. Having said that I truly believe Bernie eats this stuff up and feels it's the best route for America. Deep down I actually have a measure of sympathy for people who extol the virtues of socialism b/c it goes to the outright failure of our educational system the last 50+ years. That we have bred this many people who think it would be a good thing to import into the American way of life is a travesty.
 

Seed tick

Sergeant of the Hide
Belligerents
Minuteman
Nov 8, 2018
460
457
69
Bloomy & Cankles. Total nightmare. Hope to hell I’m wrong. Our way of life is in big dam trouble.
 

acudaowner

Old Salt
Belligerents
Minuteman
Dec 26, 2018
2,628
1,555
119
I personally would really like to see bernie and trump square off in a debate mostly to see the number of socialist in this country that could want to trade what freedoms we have left for slave chains in a socialist dictator run society . I think it would be scary but a eye opener at least something worth watching bloomeberg is no different than bernie they both want power and all the money one is just more open about his wanting to be the next castro .
 

SonicBurlap

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Aug 14, 2018
1,144
600
119
So Bloomin' Dork thinks our farmers are simpletons, and now the former soup Nazi from NY, "No Salt For You!" tells us his take on health care:

"(OAN Newsroom)
Presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg was under fire for comments he’s made, this time about the elderly and farmers.
It began with a video of Bloomberg speaking on health care Sunday. He claimed health care will bankrupt us if we don’t begin turning away the elderly.
“If you show up with prosthetic cancer and you’re 95 years old, we should say… there’s no cure and we can’t do anything. If it’s a young person, we should do something about it,” stated the former New York City mayor."

I believe we are witnessing a new birth of megalomania, a la "The Great Dictator".
 

10ring'r

Major Hide Member
Belligerents
Minuteman
Apr 9, 2019
1,146
1,511
119
60
Wisconsin
Maybe, just maybe, if ol'bloomy gets the nomination, the bernie bro's and mikey's lackeys, can fight it out in the streets and we can all sit back with popcorn and a Coke, with some Jack in it, and watch the circus. Maybe they will just F'n eat themselves and we won't have to worry about all this commie-jizim and totalitarizm for the remainder of days?? That would be soooo F'n nice! Just a thought. Mac:unsure::rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: OldSalty