This is my first post here but I am a long time forum member on some other forums. I am here because I want your opinions on a build I am starting and I have a few delima's. The post will be long because I need to tell you a lot of info so you will know how to give a accurate opinion.
The build is going to be a 45 caliber smokeless muzzleloader. I already have my 45 cal no.7 contour Krieger barrel and had planned on going the cheap route with a Obendorf Mauser 98 action but I am concerned about receiver flex due to the thumb cut. Will a one piece Ken Ferrel 98 Mauser sight base stiffen a 98 receiver adaquetly???? I will be using a VX-III 4.5x14 LR 30mm scope for the build. This muzzleloader will be shooting a 250gr Parker Balistic Extreme bullet at approx. 2950fps using up to 78gr of IMR4198 with a 30 inch barrel. It should generate about 40-45 lbs of recoil.
So I have considered using a Remington receiver, a Sendora SS receiver to be exact to match my Krieger SS barrel. I will also try and use the same Sendora HS Pression stock with a added Limbsaver recoil pad.
What I mainly want your opinions on is the 700 Receiver. I don't want to spend the money to have it blue printed. If I will need to go that route I will just buy a custom receiver, maybe a Benard. How much does blue printing a 700 receiver shrink your groups? I know, what a question to ask becuase there are just to many variables. The goal I am trying to match with this build is 1 MOA or so we are on the same page a 4 inch group at 400 yards. The muzzleloader I am trying to copy/build on the cheap is spec'd at 4 MOA and is built on a BAT SV action but does it really need to be such a perfect action when there is no chamber???
The other question is about barrel wip. Will a 700 SA action receiver be stiff enough to handle the 30 inches of a No.7 contour Krieger barrel in free float?
I am also concerned about the recoil. The guy that builds these muzzleloaders puts them in heavy laminate thumbhole stocks. I am wondering how much cheak slap I am going to get with this HS Precision stock when I load this cannon full out? Maybe I should consider a thumbhole stock as well.
Anyway, I hope you have not lost interest by now and I would welcome all opinions.
Thanks, 1872CG
The build is going to be a 45 caliber smokeless muzzleloader. I already have my 45 cal no.7 contour Krieger barrel and had planned on going the cheap route with a Obendorf Mauser 98 action but I am concerned about receiver flex due to the thumb cut. Will a one piece Ken Ferrel 98 Mauser sight base stiffen a 98 receiver adaquetly???? I will be using a VX-III 4.5x14 LR 30mm scope for the build. This muzzleloader will be shooting a 250gr Parker Balistic Extreme bullet at approx. 2950fps using up to 78gr of IMR4198 with a 30 inch barrel. It should generate about 40-45 lbs of recoil.
So I have considered using a Remington receiver, a Sendora SS receiver to be exact to match my Krieger SS barrel. I will also try and use the same Sendora HS Pression stock with a added Limbsaver recoil pad.
What I mainly want your opinions on is the 700 Receiver. I don't want to spend the money to have it blue printed. If I will need to go that route I will just buy a custom receiver, maybe a Benard. How much does blue printing a 700 receiver shrink your groups? I know, what a question to ask becuase there are just to many variables. The goal I am trying to match with this build is 1 MOA or so we are on the same page a 4 inch group at 400 yards. The muzzleloader I am trying to copy/build on the cheap is spec'd at 4 MOA and is built on a BAT SV action but does it really need to be such a perfect action when there is no chamber???
The other question is about barrel wip. Will a 700 SA action receiver be stiff enough to handle the 30 inches of a No.7 contour Krieger barrel in free float?
I am also concerned about the recoil. The guy that builds these muzzleloaders puts them in heavy laminate thumbhole stocks. I am wondering how much cheak slap I am going to get with this HS Precision stock when I load this cannon full out? Maybe I should consider a thumbhole stock as well.
Anyway, I hope you have not lost interest by now and I would welcome all opinions.
Thanks, 1872CG