Burn Rate, Caliber and Velocity

Eoddave27

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Jan 9, 2018
1,303
1,219
50
Bel Air, MD
Hey guys. I’m looking for a good book on the subject. I’m transferring to the ballistics development team where I work and I need to get a better understanding of powder burn rate and why one powder works better with one caliber than another. For instance Varget works great with a 168 grain projectile in a 308 moving around 2650 FPS. When you use the same powder behind a 6.5mm bullet in a Creedmoor it just doesn’t have the performance and you need to move down to lighter bullets for the powder to perform and end up getting a lot more velocity. To me that would mean you need something burning a little faster to be ideal since the bulletin leaving the barrel in less time. I have been reloading long enough to know what powders tend to work best with which calibers but this job will be a whole different league. We will be developing new and experimental ammo for the military. Since a lot of what we will do is experimental there is really no set powders to work with. I would like to arm myself with as much knowledge as possible before I start. I will be working with guys who have been there for years and have this down to a science. They know ballistics and ammo but they need someone who understands the shooting portion of the equation which is where I come in. All these guys see is velocity and energy on target which we all know is only a small part of the equation. Anyway, in an effort to help me be more of a contribution to the team I would like to educate myself.
 
Oh the fun to be had with that job! Some times what we think would make sense doesn't in the world of building a better bullet. In the Creedmoor specifically the slower powders seem to work better for the 130+ pills. Really 140+. Varget is OK but I rarely get the performance when compared with other powders better suited for the cartridge. If your going military dev you are probably going 123G range of bullets? While Varget will work and it will certainly be a good option for temp stability that the military would love to see ….your leaving performance on the table and may want to keep with the tried and true H4350 and associated burn rate area. If you go lighter than the 123 range IMR 8208 XBR....
 
Actually our lab isn’t testing anything in 6.5 yet. Just 308, 338, 300wm, 270, 5.56 and 50 cal. I guess they will probably eventually start working with the 6.5 since some of the SOCOM guys are starting to use it but not as of yet.