Hey guys,
I have been running the first generation Bushnell DMR 3.5-21x50 with G2DMR reticle on my primary match rifle for the past couple years, with no real complaints. The scope has been absolutely reliable, tracks perfectly, and has performed flawlessly in the time I've had it. About the only thing I dislike about it is the (often maligned) way the image takes on a purple-ish tinge at higher magnifications.
So my questions are - is the glass on the DMR-II and IIi significantly and noticeably better than on the first generation scopes? Do the newer models address/fix the color issue at higher magnifications? Is it worth spending the money to upgrade to the latest model, or should I stick with my first generation scope, and spend my money on ammo/training/matches/barrels?
If I were to buy the DMR-II, my old scope would go onto my .223 training rifle (which currently wears a Bushnell Elite Tactical 3-12x44 G2DMR).
Thanks for your input!
Nic
I have been running the first generation Bushnell DMR 3.5-21x50 with G2DMR reticle on my primary match rifle for the past couple years, with no real complaints. The scope has been absolutely reliable, tracks perfectly, and has performed flawlessly in the time I've had it. About the only thing I dislike about it is the (often maligned) way the image takes on a purple-ish tinge at higher magnifications.
So my questions are - is the glass on the DMR-II and IIi significantly and noticeably better than on the first generation scopes? Do the newer models address/fix the color issue at higher magnifications? Is it worth spending the money to upgrade to the latest model, or should I stick with my first generation scope, and spend my money on ammo/training/matches/barrels?
If I were to buy the DMR-II, my old scope would go onto my .223 training rifle (which currently wears a Bushnell Elite Tactical 3-12x44 G2DMR).
Thanks for your input!
Nic