Cadex defense chassis VS MDT chassis
- Thread starter John22
- Start date
I have a ESS and Field Competition, I will have to say I don't like the stock cheek piece on my ESS but I think I have an old one on there. So I just took a old weibad pad and made it fit. Now its not a problem. I am pretty I have the old buttstock so I cant comment on the new style. Both have the same XLR grip angled not the vertical.
ONLY DIFFERENCE
Cadex smaller thumb shelf
bigger grip area
ESS smaller grip area VS Cadex
ESS bigger thumb shelf but only enough to know the difference not really much bigger
both are awesome i would go with the cadex for 1 reason, if you get a long action you can swap out bottom metal and go with a short or long action calibers. Poor mans AXMC.
ONLY DIFFERENCE
Cadex smaller thumb shelf
bigger grip area
ESS smaller grip area VS Cadex
ESS bigger thumb shelf but only enough to know the difference not really much bigger
both are awesome i would go with the cadex for 1 reason, if you get a long action you can swap out bottom metal and go with a short or long action calibers. Poor mans AXMC.
Anyone out there have experience with both the Cadex Defense Strike Pro and the MDT ACC Elite? How do they compare?
The Cadex is good if you like assembling a chassis with 1000 parts. They do seem to have more flex in the buttstock than MDT, you can visually see it shift in the scope,
I have sat behind a couple of strike pro chassis and I own an MDT Premier.
The ACC Elite has a few nicer features than my Premier but I needed the short buttstock which I couldn’t order separately with the Elite which is why I went that route.
MDT has 3 different lengths of buttstocks plus the optional hinge which adds an additional inch to the LOP.
I am not discounting the Cadex chassis but I believe that the MDT Elite has a greater set of features and has a greater amount of optional extras such as the different chassis weights.
Truth is you can’t go wrong with either.
