• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: Caption This Sniper Fail Meme

    View thread

Night Vision Cadex NVG mount review

Delta4-3

Gunny Sergeant
Commercial Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
May 21, 2013
1,715
23
Arkansas
I'm constantly exploring new night vision accessories in search or better or less expensive options. The latest accessory that I have been testing the last few months is the Cadex 643-PL night vision mount. It's design borrows heavily from other mounts on the market, but does have some unique features. Before I really get in to it, the topic of night vision mounts is pretty subjective. For instance, some people love the INVG, but even for a single 14, the TATM is still my personal favorite. Not for any technical reason, but probably because that is what I was issued, therefor, it is muscle memory to manipulate the TATM in the dark. There are better mounts out there, but I like that one.
This mount was issued in small numbers to the brown water navy. I haven't spoken with any RIVRON guys that were issued them to see if they liked them or not, but I have my guesses. I can see where it would be nice to have polymer gear in a high moisture environment.

Probably the best thing this mount has going for it is it's relatively light weight and its versatility. The most advantageous feature is that you can use either interface, dovetail or bayonet, with this mount. It comes with both adapters, and both can be left on the mount at all times so you don't lose the one not in use, if you choose.
Here is a picture of both adapters on the mount.
wAmT2MW.jpg


Another positive is that it comes with a dovetail J-arm similar to Wilcox's. The bonus? You can find the mount, both adapters, and a dovetail J-arm for under $50 on ebay. That means you are getting a dovetail J-Arm for a little more than free. I used the included J-arm with a Wilcox G24, TATM, AKA2, Rhino II, and the Cadex. It worked equally well on each mount. So, I am happy with what I paid for the mount, even if all I got was the dovetail J-arm.
s3TMzy9.jpg


The dovetail J-arm by itself...
qM6kwFc.jpg


I have never like force-to-overcome mounts as much as the alternative. However, this mount could be the exception. It is a force-to-overcome mount (meaning there are not buttons to be pushed to go from the active position, to the stowed position, and vice versa) but, it is adjustable so that the user can manipulate the mount so that it requires a specific amount of force to raise or lower the mount. I do like that feature, though the knob used to adjust said tension (pictured below) is a little bulky.

OhhVXiv.jpg


Pitch control is located on the left side and works pretty much like any other pitch control lever.
alh2HeY.jpg


In both pictures above you can see the vertical adjustment knob at the top of the mount, which works identically to several Norotos offerings, but is not quite as smooth.

Overall, I can see a market for this mount, with some caveat's.
1) It is far superior to the legacy rhino mount in every aspect accept one...it is bulkier (as seen below).
2) Number 1 is only true if you pay used price ($150 or less would be my comfort zone). Retail is something like $435. There is absolutely no way I would pay the same price for this as I would a new G24.
2zi8rDz.jpg


Pro's:

It is relatively cheap when purchased used.
Relatively light.
Huge bonus: Can utilize either dovetail or bayonet interface.
Adjustable tension for raise/lower.
Everything locks up solid...much more so than the traditional J-arm in a legacy rhino mount.
Corrosion resistance.
It has a HUGE amount of vertical adjustment.

Con's:
Retail price is insane.
It is bulky when compared to other common mounts on the market.
It has a little flex when used with heavier systems like dual 14's, PVS-21's, or PVS-15's.



Durability is undetermined at this point. In the last few months I have actually not been clotheslined or fallen on my face while wearing nod's. This is extremely rare for me to go more than a week without one or the other (usually both) happening. So, unfortunately I didn't get any durability testing in. I will say though, I would be pretty confident that it would hold up well considering the amount of material present.
 
Not sure if this is the same mount they released 5 years ago we tested. It appears to be the same mold, but I could be mistaken. Anyhoot, the stow away aspect of the mount was also a tad bit higher and too the front with all the verticle space position vs the competition. Glad to see it came down a few bucks in price? (Sigh) It used to be in the $500+ range. :/

Some old school helmets we have on display that include the CADEX form 4-5 years ago. .

Cadex_zps7f0e798a.jpg
 
Last edited:
Vic,
I think it is the same one. You are correct, it does also stow pretty high. All in all, with all the mounts out there, I would place it right above the legacy rhino, and below everything else. However, I paid $39 on ebay with the dovetail J-arm and both adapters, which makes it more appealing. They have been out for quite a while, but due to the bulk I wasn't willing to get one until I found one too cheap to pass up.

What were your thoughts on it?
 
Vic,
I think it is the same one. You are correct, it does also stow pretty high. All in all, with all the mounts out there, I would place it right above the legacy rhino, and below everything else. However, I paid $39 on ebay with the dovetail J-arm and both adapters, which makes it more appealing. They have been out for quite a while, but due to the bulk I wasn't willing to get one until I found one too cheap to pass up.

What were your thoughts on it?

Initial thoughts were the price when they came out at over $500.00. CADEX was known and still is for some very innovative manufactured products. This was their first attempt with a complex polymer part and I think the one I have was the first one they produced they wanted us to test is why I was curious if it changed. Granted this mount was out long before the G24, nor any other system that had unique characteristics of the CADEX mount. But the biggest issue IMHO running it way back then was the high and front mount position when stowed on the helmet that caused a real nose dive weight effect. Also at that time, there was not a good lightweight helmet system produced except for Kevlar which the weight itself mitigated the mount profile. Ops Core Base Jumps, Team Wendy's, etc. with their stable retention systems were not out as yet which compounded the nose dive effect due to the fact the only light weight helmets were PT Alpha's seen above which we know have mediocre melon retention. Add to that no real formal counterweight systems were being made so duct tape and lead weights were a must for the PT's and skate board helmets.

Still the CADEX mount was ahead of its time for what it did IMHO. Glad to see you got it on the cheap.

Edit, price at that time was US Dollars, not Canadian. :)

Vic
 
Last edited:
I normally don't post on forums, But I have used their newest version, which is updated and even stronger then what is pictured on this post. It now sets lower and is even more compact but still having all the features. And is at a lower price.
 
Victor-TNVC,

It also has its own shroud, which no longer has the ratchet strap. And comes with counter balance.

Ill send photos if you would like...Just need to learn how...I normally just view like I had said before.