I could easily point out that your talking points are almost directly from Karl Rove.
Can you say the word "Monkey" any longer
- Thread starter pmclaine
- Start date
I could easily point out that your talking points are almost directly from Karl Rove.
I just showed those to the black guy I’m working with and he laughed his ass off. The only people offended by this shit are white people who want to feel better about themselves.
Are you going to address the exact quote from Ron DeSantis now, or are you going to keep moving the narrative whenever someone pins your ass down?
I had those books in Denmark as a child. Yea, he looks like a minstrel, but how can the Golliwog be racist when he's the good guy? The Golliwog was the hero who was rescuing everyone and righting wrongs.
I agree with that. Its' absurd internet trolling. Anyone who actually believes these wild anti-Joo conspiracies is an idiot.
To me, and this is just opinion, anti-Semitism is as vile as real racism is, and is just as socially unacceptable on the right as any other prejudice. On the left however, anti-Semitism is open and encouraged. Unless a Jew is advocating for the destruction of their native land they're an enemy to be attacked and degraded by any means necessary. You need to look in a mirror to see what equivocating, hypocrisy, and double standards are.
It's obviously been many decades, but I don't recall them being racist at all or even race being any part of the stories. I will say that seeing that thing again I would not want my kids reading the books or playing with a doll that looked like that! It does look completely racist to me.
Q
QuickNDirty
Guest
Have you ever wondered what life would be like if you weren't addicted to being butthurt?
Its easy to find things to be offended by when you are looking for them.
The Dems are a building site that has no ability to support a foundation. So instead of finding a foundation that is good. They just build a construction wall around it filled with beautiful drawings of the future utopian structure. But they never build it. They just say how beautiful it will be and tell you to hate these people for it not being done yet.
People can only be so stupid before they eventually get it. Because of Trump, People are starting to get it. That scares the piss out of the left.
The Dems are a building site that has no ability to support a foundation. So instead of finding a foundation that is good. They just build a construction wall around it filled with beautiful drawings of the future utopian structure. But they never build it. They just say how beautiful it will be and tell you to hate these people for it not being done yet.
People can only be so stupid before they eventually get it. Because of Trump, People are starting to get it. That scares the piss out of the left.
Mountain creek, you have a admirer!
Our little Snowflake BangBangCumSplat is experiencing some serious shit. Gotta be a daily struggle dealing with oneself when you're 'that guy'. Damn. 
Please ride a bicycle across Isis controlled territory to prove you aren’t racist and humans are kind.
Negative ghost rider, the pattern is full.
Happened to see a interview w/ Gillum yesterday. Not sure what the problems in Tallahassee are but he's very well spoken, obviously intelligent, and clearly not monkeying around. Unfortunately, DeSantis' comment has brought more attention and publicity to Gillum than he could have bought.
Did you read DeSantis' full quote with context? I posted here.
This has nothing to do with Gillum as a person and everything to do with his policies/politics.
Hey, hey, we're the Monkees
And people say we monkey around - four Racist
That my good sir is a perfect textbook example of Liberals/Democrats/Communists/Progressives/SJWs Trying to point the blame at their opponents for the things they themselves are guilty of.
Go take a look these days at who is actively hating Israel openly & who openly bashes the Jewish community in this country..
You'll find it's the Antifa/SJW/Democrat/Communist/Progressive/BLM ilk you love so much.
Most "right wingers" that are of the conservative / republican bent in this country are often found in the supporting camp of Israel and the actual Jewish community. For that matter the daughter of the president that all of your SJW buddies hate, who all of your SJW buddies also love to pile hate on.... IS a Jew. Trump has done more for Israel and the Jewish People than Obama, Bush, Clinton & Bush all put together.
You'll find just as many "Jews" who hate the "Globalists" as "right wing" people. If I think the Globalist Soros is truly vile does that mean I hate white men?
I truly dislike for very valid reasons the "Globalists", who need to be stopped for the good of mankind. While at the same time having no problem at all with the Jewish People, the Jewish Faith or Israel.
Some Globalists claim Jewish faith or racial heritage, but most are more likely to be nominal Christians, atheists or Satanists or worshipers of themselves. It's much the same as your buddies trying to call everybody who didn't like Obama a racist... well I don't like Bernie either so.... let me guess somehow I'm antisemitic for not liking his Communist ass? But I guess you also claim I'm Sexist for not liking Hillary.... the common thread is not their skin color, religion, gender, but their message of Globalism, Communism and their open hatred for things I hold dear that makes me dislike them intensely.
Once again, when the Communist camp runs out of actual arguments they start screaming Racism, Sexism, Antisemitism and anything else they can lie about to try to throw their opponents off their guard.. it's a time worn trick that the conservatives are finally getting wise to and refusing to be cowered by any more.
I know exactly what DeSantis said, I heard it when he said it. There were no flashing lights/alarm bells and I wouldn't have given it a second thought if it wasn't later put in the spin cycle by the media. I don't think you understood my post.
And yet your critiques of Globalism are based on a false characterization that originates in Anti-semetic circles and not in reality. You saying that Globalism is the same as Communism in your post is proof enough.
In reality Globalism is capitalism, and is still largely supported by both parties except for the fringe who sees it as some organized ploy to end their way of life or whatever nonsense.
California Democrats call for In-N-Out boycott after burger chain donates $25G to GOP - Fox News https://apple.news/AHMfuz2CmT_-hV6ANS7mVpw
I’m gonna eat some in n out tonight boys and girls.
I’m gonna eat some in n out tonight boys and girls.
The actual Globalist elite don't really care if they use Communism or Crony Capitalism to accomplish their goals of a small elite group controlling the wealth and direction of the world with all the rest of the "deplorables" as their serfs. They believe that they are the "betters" of everyone and should rule the world as they know what is best for everyone and of course as such they should have all the money & everybody should do as they say.
They are not even shy about telling you to your face. Just watch the old interviews with Sorros (a mid level front guy), where he laughs about enjoying crashing countries and causing all kinds of upheavals.
Or Bloomberg (a lower end player) where he says he actually believes that the "rich" like him have a duty and calling to tell everybody else what they should be doing.
Karl rove is a member of the coup.
I dont read talking points.
I am an individual that can choose and fight my own battles.
What are your orders for tomorrow?
I agree generally with what you have said. However, it should be noted that all sides of an argument are marketing for public opinion share value. To that end, one side has become so emphatic about this tactic that they have written a Manifesto on the subject. What is important about the manifesto isn’t the ez bake recipe for the mechanics of fucking up society, it is the end goals and aspirations of the author and those that think alike.
Last edited:
Congratulations. The two people you named are what Anti-semites consider as being part of "International Jewery" and the idea that characterization of "Globalism" as a coherent ideaology that ends with the destruction of Europe is another Anti-semetic talking point.
It just so happens to be a coincidence that the most commonly named 'globalists' are Jews, and the talking points about them come directly from anti-semites.
Or that the most commonly echoed idea on here is an existential fear of Cultural Marxism...i.e another name for what Nazis called "Jewish Bolshevism."
That’s not only racist, calling that monkey a monkey. But also insensitive to his/her/it’s/that’s/whatchamacallit’s physical deformity. ?
Unbelievable.....ignore....ignore.....ignore.....fuck theses monkeys.
So basically once again you are actually stating a racist position.
According to you and the rest of your SJW friends it seems, you can't simply dislike somebody for their actions, the harm they have caused to their fellow men, and their publicly stated views. Again not things others have said, but what they themselves openly say, do & preach.
You seem to be stating that the race or religion or gender that you assume somebody to be of is the only thing that matters.
Isn't that pretty racist?
You don't have any actual comments to say why my views on Soros, Junkers, Bloomberg or other elitists are incorrect, or any rebuttals to show that their publicly stated plans & ideas which I oppose, are actually correct so it appears that you just jump to histronics & name calling without proof.
Which is even more interesting because I'm saying I don't like them specifically for what they openly admit to thinking and doing, which they like saying time after time as they shove themselves into the news & spotlight to tell more people their views and specifically saying that I don't take race, creed or religion into account.
It just goes to show that the SJW message you seem to be promoting is actually racist.
Communism, Socialism and Marxism in all it's forms is a great evil that killed over 100 million last century and enslaved countless more. Those of us that love freedom and liberty and individual human rights have a duty to do our utmost to fight against it.
Assumed race, religion or ethnicity has nothing to do with it.
You'll find Communists & the global elitists and one world types made up from all races, creeds, religions & ethnicity.
Are you personally offended because you identify as being of Jewish religion, or ethnicity? Or are you like most SJWs, virtue signalling false rage about what you assume somebody else would be small minded enough to be offended by?
Are you also going to imply somehow that no person that identifies as "Jewish" by religion, ethnicity or heritage or some similar mix could have a significant dislike for the Globalists and Elitists or the SJW type? You'll find lots of "Jewish" people also despise the same Globalists and Elitist type, because of their actual racist dislike of Israel and Jews who choose to be proud of their cultural, religious and geographical identity.
Your positions seem to point to you being the actual racist in the room.
I like or dislike people solely for their actions, ideas, dogma and stated plans or their stated hatred for me. Race, creed or gender doesn't influence my decisions or views on what I like & dislike, and so I refuse to let anyone try to win their arguments by yelling "Racist" or "Sexist" or "Gender" or whatever at the top of their lungs to hide their lack of valid points.
I refuse to be intimidated by SJW type who like to toss out "trigger words" to try to make conservatives get on the defensive.
It is especially rich to claim "Anti Semitic" when you talk the SJW/Communists/Antifa/BLM/Muslim line, who are actually very racially prejudiced against Israel & Jews.
Q
QuickNDirty
Guest
Careful, man. With simple logic like that, you may make this guy's head explode.
"What? You mean, it's possible to think someone that's jewish is a piece of shit, without thinking that's he's a piece of shit because he's jewish? I'VE BEEN LIED TO MY WHOLE LIFE!"
Q
QuickNDirty
Guest
I didn't prove any point you've made. You make no points.
You whine, you cry, and you scream about racism...
At the end of the day, George Soros is a piece of shit. I don't care what color he is or who he calls God.
The dude is a literal fucking nazi, and you seem to think he's good people. I don't. I think he's a piece of shit.
People that recongize racism are the real racists.
Jewish people that escaped the Holocaust were the real Nazis.
Jews are racially inferior untermensch while simultaneously controlling the world.
Anti-semtism has never been, and never will be a coherent idealogy, and it's contradictions are not a bug...it's a feature.
I'm not racist.........I dislike all the MFers.................equally...........
Q
QuickNDirty
Guest
Has anyone ever taken the time to contemplate the names "Republican" and "Democrat?" And think about what the very nature of their parties imply?
The term "Democrat" going back two centuries... is about majority rule. About pleasing the masses. About pandering to the largest number of people in a Greek-kind of democracy where majority rules and the minority, well... they can go %$#k themselves. This also worked great in a system where only white males could vote... especially in a South where the majority was really a minority... if you took out slaves and women (dames, skirts and broads for those UN-PC among-us.) In which case, a majority of qualified voters could always rule over a minority.
Then you have the Republicans... which ultimately triumphed over the Whig's. And took over their party. Again, what's in a name? Oh... yeah... a Republic. A Constitutional Republic. In which the majority does not rule. But one in which a Constitution sets out the dictates of governance in which the majority cannot rule-over or oppress the minority... because there are a massive number of checks and balances built into the system to ensure that the Majority... does not win.
Remember that in a democracy... the two wolves can vote against the sheep to decide what's for dinner. In a Constitiutional Republic, the sheep is protected from... becoming dinner.
Perhaps this is not the thread in which to post this little reminder... But I get awful tired of hearing how we are a democracy... and how Democrats have the best interests of the sheep in mind. When, really, they are voting on who to have for dinner. Especially now that they have turned into the Communist Party.
Let's see.... who did they have for dinner? The entire proletariat. The kulaks. Anyone who was deemed educated. In the 1930's... almost everyone above Major in the military. Jews. Minorities (as they called them) in the 'stans. What was the final death toll? 30 million? 45 million? I know that it dwarfed National Socialism (their kissing cousin's) death toll by about 3x.
Meh... what's in a name.
Let's just hold a majority vote here and get rid of the minority members who we find so annoying here.
Sirhr
The term "Democrat" going back two centuries... is about majority rule. About pleasing the masses. About pandering to the largest number of people in a Greek-kind of democracy where majority rules and the minority, well... they can go %$#k themselves. This also worked great in a system where only white males could vote... especially in a South where the majority was really a minority... if you took out slaves and women (dames, skirts and broads for those UN-PC among-us.) In which case, a majority of qualified voters could always rule over a minority.
Then you have the Republicans... which ultimately triumphed over the Whig's. And took over their party. Again, what's in a name? Oh... yeah... a Republic. A Constitutional Republic. In which the majority does not rule. But one in which a Constitution sets out the dictates of governance in which the majority cannot rule-over or oppress the minority... because there are a massive number of checks and balances built into the system to ensure that the Majority... does not win.
Remember that in a democracy... the two wolves can vote against the sheep to decide what's for dinner. In a Constitiutional Republic, the sheep is protected from... becoming dinner.
Perhaps this is not the thread in which to post this little reminder... But I get awful tired of hearing how we are a democracy... and how Democrats have the best interests of the sheep in mind. When, really, they are voting on who to have for dinner. Especially now that they have turned into the Communist Party.
Let's see.... who did they have for dinner? The entire proletariat. The kulaks. Anyone who was deemed educated. In the 1930's... almost everyone above Major in the military. Jews. Minorities (as they called them) in the 'stans. What was the final death toll? 30 million? 45 million? I know that it dwarfed National Socialism (their kissing cousin's) death toll by about 3x.
Meh... what's in a name.
Let's just hold a majority vote here and get rid of the minority members who we find so annoying here.
Sirhr
