Why are some so inherently easier to load for then others. Is it their specific design for that or is it just an accidental side effect?
You should argue this point with the dude from the Sherman line of cases. One thing, barrel dia has absolutely nothing to with how accurate a rifle can be. It may play a part in just how long a barrel can be accurate in the form of sustained rate of fire.I'm not saying this as fact- just my opinion.
Case design is overrated... and I don't buy into the "inherently accurate" part either. Take a case that has the "wrong" features and chamber a premium barrel for it- and they shoot. Yes- 6br is incredibly easy to do load development for- but look at the barrels on them. Would 6br be as forgiving if it was chambered in featherweight barrels? How the cartridge is perceived and marketed has a huge effect-- and plays into what contour/quality of a barrel becomes the standard.
Some cartridges are definitely more efficient- and that makes things nice. If you can get good velocity with less powder then that should make things easier to be consistent. But barrel outweighs case design... as I see it.
Not trying to change the subject but what's with the 25-06 for reloading.I used to buy into the theory, and still do to some degree. 30 degree shoulder, shorter cases, longer neck. But even before the time I had heard of it, some wise guy blew the shoulder forward on a 6 BR case and it was setting records all over the place, and 300 WM has always been around.
Conjecture and speculation is a dominant force in shooting, from the guns, to loads, to the gear we choose.
That said, I would bet an asston of money developing a load for a 25 creedmoor will be easier than for a 25-06 for 99.8% of people.
Nothing, it was a comparison, if for no other reason the amount of modern data for the creed case compared to 25-06.Not trying to change the subject but what's with the 25-06 for reloading.