Re: Choose the red pill or the blue pill..Last options
Also compared them side-by-side and this is my impartial input:
- Both are stand-up companies that stand behind their product.
- Glass is preference driven. I notice NF has a cool tint that appears brighter with higher contast, where USO has a warm tint that some say makes it look a little 'dull'. Think halogen (NF) vs. soft white bulb (USO). In daytime, USO colors are a lot more natural where the NF tint makes, for instance, reds a bit pink/magenta. Re: resolution, USO seems better at exercises like resolving fine black lines on bright white paper. Again, glass between the two is personal preference--I think both have great glass--but this is what I would look for.
- The EREK knob design lets you use full range of adjustment vs. ZS being a mechanical block -- with a 20MOA base, doubt you will ever use it all.
- NF entire ocular bell moves with mag ring which makes using scope caps hard. Not an issue if you prefer bikinis.
- NF comes standard with side parallax; USO TPAL is adds premium cost
- NF illum is "on/off" and requires turret/battery removal to adjust; USO is 11 illum settings on the fly.
- MOA options: NF MOA reticles are lackluster--no contest if you are getting a MOA/MOA scope. Both come in 0.25 MOA, but USO also offers 0.5 MOA. Also, USO makes IPHY, NF does not.
- Mil: NF's MLR reticle is great, but that's your only option. You already know USO has a selection.
- Zoom: obviously, 3.2-17 is more broad than 3.5-15x. Yes, 13% more zoom is noticable.
- USO top-end FOV is better ... 8.3 ft @ 17x @ 100yds vs NF's 7.3 ft @ 15x @ 100yds.
- USO is heavier and longer.
I would say when you check them out in person, pay attention to these factors & you will know which one you like more.