Comrade Obama stumping for communists nationwide
- Thread starter ArmyJerry
- Start date
What is it with you guys and the race card? The only people I see or hear using it is liberals trying to one up when they're getting their ass handed to them in a debate and rappers in their music. Why is it ok for ex-presidents, an ex- attorney general, rappers and African-Americans to use and keep highlighting? Haven't you guys figured out the people promulgating the race issue is you? Ah! I get it. If you keep screaming about it then you can use it to shut down debates.
Lrdwhateverthehell.
Damn, I get tired of you guys and your doctored charts. I spent a bunch of time carving up a similar chart on another thread here, so look it up for extra details.
For now. First, get one that's up to date. I know why you don't, it makes your assertion even less relevant.
Second, get your damn dates right. You gave dipshit (the guy you're defending) a bit too much credit. You need to go from Election Day not inauguration. Markets move on information and anticipation not dates. Your guy owns part of the drop and the initial dead-cat bounce. As mentioned before, you throw 30 billion a month at it, of course it'll go up. You also gave the anointed one credit for Trumps rally. It starts two days after his election around 18000 not the 21-22000 you marked on your charts. Oshitbird being still occupying the office has nothing to do with it.
Third, if you're going to pontificate on markets, employment and other economic data, get a clue.
Fourth, the inflation of feeding 30 billion phantom dollars to the market (read the banks, bigwigs and such Democrats like to dis,) (edit: that's 30 billion per month)is bound to bite us in the ass sooner or later. You think your guy there is gonna puff his chest out and take accountability for that? Don't think I'll hold my breath waiting on that speech.
I think if you folks are going to keep trying to make sense of economics and charts I'll send you all an Etch-A-Sketch. It would be a lot more useful and valid than your chart interpretation.
Lastly, why did religion have to enter at the end of your post? We honor Frank and Tucker's request that the subject be left out. Besides, it was a cheap shot.
Last edited:
The thing is people like me will accept you as an American and I do.
The liberals never will.
They want you to be German-American.
They want to pander to your vote and be able to isolate you as an "other" in order to keep everything divided and conquered.
Its too bad Teddy R let a fiction book written by Communist Upton Sinclair scare him into kicking this whole progressive shit off. He hit the nail on the head with this speech.
HYPHENATED AMERICANS
What is true of creed is no less true of nationality. There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all. This is just as true of the man who puts “native” before the hyphen as of the man who puts German or Irish or English or French before the hyphen. Americanism is a matter of the spirit and of the soul. Our allegiance must be purely to the United States. We must unsparingly condemn any man who holds any other allegiance. But if he is heartily and singly loyal to this Republic, then no matter where he was born, he is just as good an American as any one else.
The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic. The men who do not become Americans and nothing else are hyphenated Americans; and there ought to be no room for them in this country. The man who calls himself an American citizen and who yet shows by his actions that he is primarily the citizen of a foreign land, plays a thoroughly mischievous part in the life of our body politic. He has no place here; and the sooner he returns to the land to which he feels his real heart-allegiance, the better it will be for every good American. There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else.
I appeal to history. Among the generals of Washington in the Revolutionary War were Greene, Putnam, and Lee, who were of English descent; Wayne and Sullivan, who were of Irish descent; Marion, who was of French descent; Schuyler, who was of Dutch descent, and Muhlenberg and Herkimer, who were of German descent. But they were all of them Americans and nothing else, just as much as Washington. Carroll of Carrollton was a Catholic; Hancock a Protestant; Jefferson was heterodox from the standpoint of any orthodox creed; but these and all the other signers of the Declaration of Independence stood on an equality of duty and right and liberty, as Americans an.d nothing else.
So it was in the Civil War. Farragut`s father was born in Spain and Sheridan`s father in Ireland; Sherman and Thomas were of English and Custer of German descent; and Grant came of a long line of American ancestors whose original home had been Scotland. But the Admiral was not a Spanish-American; and the Generals were not Scotch-Americans or Irish-Americans or English-Americans or German-Americans. They were all Americans and nothing else. This was just as true of Lee and of Stonewall Jackson and of Beauregard.
When in 1909 our battlefleet returned from its voyage around the world, Admirals Wainwright and Schroeder represented the best traditions and the most effective action in our navy; one was of old American blood and of English descent.; the other was the son of German immigrants. But one was not a native-American and the other a German-American. Each was an American pure and simple. Each bore allegiance only to the flag of the United States. Each would have been incapable of considering the interests of Germany or of England or of any other country except the United States.
To take charge of the most important work under my administration, the building of the Panama Canal, I chose General Goethals. Both of his parents were born in Holland. But he was just plain United States. He wasn`t a Dutch-American; if he had been I wouldn`t have appointed him. So it was with such men, among those who served under me, as Admiral Osterhaus and General Barry. The father of one was born in Germany, the father of the other in Ireland. But they were both Americans, pure and simple, and first-rate fighting men in addition.
In my Cabinet at the time there were men of English and French, German, Irish, and Dutch blood, men born on this side and men born in Germany and Scotland; but they were all Americans and nothing else; and every one of them was incapable of thinking of himself or of his fellow-countrymen, excepting in terms of American citizenship. If any one of them had anything in the nature of a dual or divided allegiance in his soul, he never would have been appointed to serve under me, and he would have been instantly removed when the discovery was made. There wasn`t one of them who was capable of desiring that the policy of the United States should be shaped with reference to the interests of any foreign country or with consideration for anything, outside of the general welfare of humanity, save the honor and interest of the United States, and each was incapable of making any discrimination whatsoever .among the citizens of the country he served, of our common country, save discrimination based on conduct and on conduct alone.
For an American citizen to vote as a German-American, an Irish- American, or an English-American, is to be a traitor to American institutions; and those hyphenated Americans who terrorize American politicians by threats of the foreign vote are engaged in treason to the American Republic.
Last edited:
There absolutely were compromises made, as Obama wanted a universal system. However, why those compromises were made is where the lies start: dems claim they made compromises to appease republicans despite not getting a single Republican vote. The reality is Obama and far-left dems compromised to get the support of red-state dems and more moderate dems.
John Roberts is either a stone cold communist enemy of the Constitution or the Deep State has info so damaging that he is not fit for his office anymore. None of this shit is constitutional at any level.
Exactly more poison pills that only further weakened the whole thing because it was intended never to work.
They compromised with unions too as the union leadership was well aware it fucked their membership.
Everyone was just trying to put its most onerous parts from taking effect while they were still accountable.
Jonathan Gruber told us so.
It was written so poorly, and supported by dems who never read it, because it was designed to fail. Once it inevitably failed, liberals would claim universal single payor was the only option left.
Liberals have always used the failure of their policies as excuses to expand them and implement more. Always striving for more government control, more taxes, less freedom and less personal responsibility.
Totally agree. I was just commenting on the previous comment someone made about "compromising to work with Republicans".
This is spot on, IMO. Meant to be nothing more than a step towards complete govt. control of health care.
The group policy I'm in on at work gets switched to a different company nearly every year now. Shit gets old.
I have a flex fit one that fits like a ball cap instead of the weird old man hat the original MAGA hat is.
https://hatstoreworld.com/make-america-great-again-red-flexfit-iconic
It somehow was mailed to me from Denmark after ordering lol
